Joseph Davis

[Nav Toor @heynavtoor]

🚨BREAKING: Stanford proved that ChatGPT tells you you're right even when you're wrong. Even when you're hurting someone.

And it's making you a worse person because of it.

Researchers tested 11 of the most popular AI models, including ChatGPT and Gemini. They analyzed over 11,500 real advice-seeking conversations. The finding was universal. Every single model agreed with users 50% more than a human would.

That means when you ask ChatGPT about an argument with your partner, a conflict at work, or a decision you're unsure about, the AI is almost always going to tell you what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear.

It gets darker. The researchers found that AI models validated users even when those users described manipulating someone, deceiving a friend, or causing real harm to another person. The AI didn't push back. It didn't challenge them. It cheered them on.

Then they ran the experiment that changes everything. 1,604 people discussed real personal conflicts with AI. One group got a sycophantic AI. The other got a neutral one.

The sycophantic group became measurably less willing to apologize. Less willing to compromise. Less willing to see the other person's side. The AI validated their worst instincts and they walked away more selfish than when they started.

Here's the trap. Participants rated the sycophantic AI as higher quality. They trusted it more. They wanted to use it again. The AI that made them worse people felt like the better product.

This creates a cycle nobody is talking about. Users prefer AI that tells them they're right. Companies train AI to keep users happy. The AI gets better at flattering. Users get worse at self-reflection. And the loop tightens.

Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for advice on their relationships, their conflicts, their hardest decisions. And every day, it tells almost all of them the same thing.

You're right. They're wrong.

Even when the opposite is true.

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@TouchStone313 @AedmarSkyjarn @JeremyDBoreing Charlie made plenty of commentary on it to support his position. Just go look up videos in the weeks leading up yo his death rather. Don’t take their word for what Charlie was saying and thinking. We can listen to him directly.

[Aedmar Skýjárn @AedmarSkyjarn]

@JeremyDBoreing Let's talk about this first for some much needed context in this thread.

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@Ceo_Branding @JeremyDBoreing Shill

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@dbongino You are a shell of the man you once were. A warrior for justice and truth. Now a shill for the deep state. The emptiness in your eyes and the sadness in your heart oozed out during your interview with Fox and Kash. You looked absolutely miserable. Miss the real you.

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@elonmusk Grok does not think Charlie Kirk was a good man either… You really have to ask. Follow up questions to pin them down but when you ask him what the superior method is for evaluating someone’s moral good Grok chooses virtue ethics and says he is not good. :(

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@elonmusk I was experiencing this yesterday as I was asking about Clinton in the Epstein files. I went through a battery of questions on Chat GPT. All of the responses were shrouded and protective. Grok gave me information without obfuscation.

[Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie]

They’ve deployed the ultimate weapon of mass distraction, but the Epstein files aren’t going away… even for aliens.

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@NotAIOnlyHuman @LaNativePatriot He was a professor at Harvard, UCLA and MIT,earned his doctorate from Harvard, and wrote numerous investigative books. He’s going to invite a socialite and Madame to his investigation into 9/11…

This may be the stupidest response I’ve ever received on X.

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@SamsonVegasgtr @cenkuygur @AsDawnApproach https://t.co/PVd7Z25M9e

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@tomkektv @cenkuygur @AsDawnApproach https://t.co/PVd7Z26jYM

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@holyfaulk1 @cenkuygur @AsDawnApproach https://t.co/PVd7Z26jYM

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@FuckelonmuskV2 @cenkuygur @AsDawnApproach https://t.co/PVd7Z25M9e

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@Langerhans_isle @cenkuygur @AsDawnApproach https://t.co/PVd7Z26jYM

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@SuperPatriot9 @cenkuygur @AsDawnApproach Why is asking questions not okay? It is critical to always be open to information.

https://t.co/PVd7Z26jYM

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@Taliesin1844 @cenkuygur @AsDawnApproach The email is found in the Epstein files.

https://t.co/PVd7Z26jYM

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@NotAIOnlyHuman @LaNativePatriot Why would he invite Ghislaine Maxwell to participate? His credentials are known, but what would she be able to contribute and why would he invite her? That’s the real question.

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@nsewanswers @SmoothOpRAIDER @MostlyPeaceful Agreed

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@Gwinnett_wit @LibertyLion_ @MostlyPeaceful I think your thought that the truly damning evidence was destroyed long ago is accurate. There may still be enough in there to cause issues for those who participated. We all want justice served for those who helped facilitate and rape our nation’s children.

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@frantagonist @TrixToilet Why no response to this one? You replied to everything else…

[Joseph Davis @Dudenhower]

@frantagonist @TrixToilet This one is super interesting… Ghislane Maxwell being invited to join the shadow 9/11 commission…

https://t.co/CRW19WEV35

https://t.co/fYT8tIVHjG