@DiscussingFilm She says "I chose to stare down the barrel of the camera because we are human beings, we communicate with our eyes." What was the actor doing making design choices for the artwork?
@bphillipsonMP "Some of them have got very large incomes and actually a relatively small percentage of that income going towards bursaries."
The word "some" here is doing an insane amount of heavy lifting. This is disingenuous.
https://t.co/QQuAKZKasa
#independentschools
@patrickkmaguire Leaving of his own volition, I don't believe it for a moment. He was the Beria to Starmer's Stalin and it was only matter of time before Starmer's dictatorial ways started cannibalising themselves.
@Denuuun @AtticusSilkee2 @jonathanalis1@BuddahsBrother@shovas@hoovlet Well no, because testes are reproductive structures.
It's problematic for Terfs who seem to think they get to write the rules on what a woman is, and for them, women do not have penises.
Genetic mutations form the basis of evolution.
@adeharper99@OwenPaintbrush You've made no consideration whatsoever for the safety and wellbeing of Imane herself, coming from a country that not considered progressive in its additude towards people outside of "traditional" structures.
@adeharper99@OwenPaintbrush Funny how the IBAs decision to disqualify, made by Russian Umar Kremlev with ties to Putin, came after IK beat her Russian opponent, and wasn't based on any evidence, and the "testing" came afterwards. Definitely no motive here nope.
@Denuuun @AtticusSilkee2 @jonathanalis1@BuddahsBrother@shovas@hoovlet This becomes problematic, because it now means that individuals with Anorchia, whom you class as women, can have penises, and do not need internal reproductive structures to be considered female, it's literally defined by the presence or absence of testes.
@Denuuun @AtticusSilkee2 @jonathanalis1@BuddahsBrother@shovas@hoovlet@BMcGrewvy So your argument is an individual with Anorchia may have external male sex characteristics, e.g. a penis, but your argument is that because they have XY structure they are therefore women.
@JerryTurin@CyrusKublai@MezahiMaher The IBA was stripped of its status by the IOC due to failure to improve governance, finance and *ethics* policies.
The orgs are not parallel. One is subordinate (and discredited) by the other.
IOCs rulings are more valid.
@96barrettsa @you_tacky_thing@MezahiMaher Failure to improve sub-par governance, finance and *ethics* standards.
IK and the other athlete were arbitrarily stopped from competing. The confidential tests were then done AFTER the fact.
This puts the IOC on much firmer ground than the IBA.
@Mobiuscid@MezahiMaher IBA didn't pass IOCs ethics and governance standards. That's why the IOC stripped them of their status as the international authority on boxing.
@adeharper99@OwenPaintbrush The ones by the IBA, which was stripped of its status by the IOC for failing to improve its governance, finance *and ethics* policies.
@adeharper99@OwenPaintbrush You mean the secret tests which remain confidential carried out by the discredited IBA, carried out *after* the sudden and arbitrary decision had been made by the two people in charge, and therefore instead of the test informing the decision, the test was attempting to justify it