Therapist thinking about maturity, truth, and cultural confusion
Developmental ethics | Epistemic humility
Writing at Wholesomeness Matters on Substack
Having whatever sexual fantasies you want is one of the most destructive things a human being can do. Learn more in my Substack article: https://t.co/kGcOCPHQD1
The central problem with expecting gender dysphoric youth to focus on maintaining bodily integrity is that most of them probably aren't sufficiently embodied in the first place https://t.co/du4pyr6Xsf
What if entire areas of medicine and public policy are being built on terms that can’t actually be tested, falsified, or empirically verified?
My latest essay introduces “SCAlt” — a proposed framework for separating descriptive language from unfalsifiable claims in science, ethics, and law around altering sex characteristics https://t.co/qrFjKbdOQl
I’ve just posted a Substack article on the topic of Therianism, which seems to be occurring for an increasing number of my young clients who are diagnosed or highly likely to be on the autism spectrum. The underlying causal mechanism is probably identical to that of gender identity, but Therianism can appeal to children in ways that gender identity does not as it is more openly linked to religious themes such as “past lives.” https://t.co/tDSpYr6E6U
The goal here is not to resolve debates.
The goal is more basic:
To ensure the words we use still allow disagreement, testing, and revision.
Without that, we are no longer describing the world.
We are replacing it.
https://t.co/CKbM0bCajC
The highest-stakes failures of language share three moves:
Subjective experience → treated as objective category
Description → treated as ontology
Conditional → treated as absolute
Once that happens, language stops describing reality
And starts organizing it
This pattern repeats across domains:
“Chemical imbalance” → replaces complexity
“Genetic blueprint” → implies determinism
“Detox” → implies toxins never defined
A label begins as shorthand
Then becomes the thing itself
Then begins to govern decisions
Language does something subtle and dangerous:
It turns uncertainty into certainty
Models into reality
Descriptions into identities
I call this failure linguistic hygiene.
It shows up everywhere, but nowhere are the stakes higher than here. https://t.co/Efci7VYJh2
Linguistic hygiene is not about politeness.
It is about one question:
Do our words still point to something real?
Or have they quietly replaced reality with something easier to say?
I wrote this carefully and at length because the stakes are high.
This is not about dismissal or affirmation.
It is about understanding how identity forms in different kinds of minds.
If we get that wrong, we get everything downstream wrong. https://t.co/uZVDyHwssE
When the body feels uncertain, identity shifts from something lived…
to something reasoned into.
For some, that becomes a lifeline.
For others, it becomes a path toward irreversible decisions built on a misunderstanding.
This is the part we are not talking about.
Consider how categories are processed:
A neurotypical child:
“Boys can be gentle. Girls can be rough.”
An autistic child often processes differently:
“If boys are X and I am not X… I am not a boy.”
That is not confusion.
That is precision applied to the wrong level of abstraction.
And it can impinge on identity beliefs.
A pattern I couldn’t ignore anymore:
Over the past four years, I’ve worked with 50+ individuals with cross-sex identification.
All but three showed clear signs of neurodivergence. Most were on the autism spectrum.
That’s not a coincidence.
It raises a harder question.
The conversation usually stops at correlation:
“Autism appears more frequently in gender dysphoria.”
Then we stop.
But what if we asked a different question:
What if autistic cognition itself helps produce cross-sex identification?
Not alongside it.
Not randomly.
But as a pathway.