어떤 농담을 말하는지 구체적인 예시는 모르겠지만 아마도 그냥 외적인 모습으로 사람을 특징지은것 같아. 한국인들이 길에서 마주친 이름 모르는 개들을 털의 색으로 부르는것이 몇세기 동안 익숙한 것 처럼... 사람도 그런식으로 칭하지 않았을까 싶긴 한데. 아무래도 외모를 특징지어 별명을 짓는게
@BananamasU39138@asacosy@h3reallnight Acho que vocês precisam então pedir para as suas celebridades pararem de fazer chacotas com outros coreanos bronzeados, isso fica feio na imagem de vocês…..
Skz "copying" your favs for representing Korean culture while your favs can't even represent their culture correctly in an album named Arirang ,straykids has been doing this for years
했을텐데. 일본은 한국 뉴스에 나올정도로 지나가는 관광객 행인을 어깨로 치는 행동이 자주 일어나니까... 말로 하면 되잖아? 화를 내던가.. 저 사람이 내 나라 말을 알아 듣든 말든 도로를 가리키고 바깥을 가리키며 비키세요. 하면 대부분 알아 들을걸 왜...? 사람을 치지?
교차로 사건 왜 비판받는지 알겠는데 여기서 한국인과 일본인의 감성차이는
교차로 한복판에서 멈춰서 춤을 추면 행인 흐름에 방해가 된다 (맞음) 한국인이었으면 좀 나쁜사람들은 "야! 비켜 사람지나다니는거 안보여?" 했을거고 정중한 사람은 "여기서 춤추시면 위험합니다. 사람들 많아서 방해돼요"
First it was plastic surgery, and now it’s skin. What’s next, changing her height or hair?they just can’t accept that someone this beautiful was naturally born in Korea😭…
Regarding the different reactions from iarmys and karmys towards crowd control on 0612:
As a starting point, in South Korea and cities around the world, both venues AND organizers share responsibility for event safety. This is the position in korean legislation and is also the prevailing norm in many countries. However, the allocation of this shared responsibility differs.
- In South Korea, it is the organizer/promoter who takes charge of event safety and crowd control. There is a general expectation that venues are facility providers who provide support and do not “take control of” crowd management. South Korea operates under a “beneficiary pays” system (where the promoter profiting from the event is expected to oversee contractors and vendors).
However, in many other countries, responsibility for security and logistics is split differently between the organizer/promoter and the venue itself.
- For example, in Japan (Tokyo Dome), VENUES take primary operational responsibility for security screening and internal crowd flow.
- In Mexico (Estadio GNP Seguros), it is the VENUE that leads internal operations.
- In Australia, stadiums have full time staff and VENUES take the lead on hiring third-party security vendors. Fans would blame the VENUE for failures.
- In Singapore and Hong Kong, both regard their stadiums as state-level assets, where the government maintains strict operational involvement through state-linked operators or private contractors hired by the state. The stadium is not a passive landlord, and they would get blamed for fuck ups.
- In the UK, following the 2017 Manchester Arena terrorist attacks, new legislation places stringent requirements on both venues and organizers. Venues are not passive players when it comes to safety control.
>> By contrast, while venues in South Korea still share legal responsibility with organizers, the degree of their involvement is much lower, and venues generally do not take charge of crowd control. It is the local organizer that steers the operation.
There’s also another aspect to the misunderstanding lol.
In an international context, fans would not hold a foreign artist’s agency responsible for crowd control issues in a stadium.
- When Astro World crowd crush happened in the US, people primarily sued Live Nation AND the venue (NRG Parks) AND their security vendors (CSC). Not the artist’s agency.
If an incident were to occur at a kpop concert in the US, people would primarily hold Live Nation and the venue accountable - not the foreign agency.
The same logic applies in reverse: in Korea, if a foreign artist has crowd control issues, it will also be the LOCAL organizer/promoter that gets attacked.
For BTS concerts in Korea, there is no local Live Nation layer. Where there is no local Live Nation layer, the organizer (HYBE) remains the entity responsible. As a reminder, HYBE isn’t just a label, it a conglomerate that promotes itself as the artist’s agency, the local tour organizer, and tour promoter.
If HYBE engages third-party contractors (ie. dream with us), when things go wrong, they are responsible for the failures of their contractors.
I attach some pictures of my experience in Jamsil Olympic Stadium in 2019. You can see that Dream With Us was the entity that BIGHIT contracted with in 2019. They are also the vendors for Goyang and Busan in 2026. I do not know why standards have fallen so much, but HYBE needs to either audit this company or drop them.
I hope this explains to both sides that opposing reactions are not irrational. Let’s stop fighting and understand each other a bit more.