🧵(1/n)
Pakistan claiming to be the generation of the IVC is absolutely hilarious. The socio-religious ideology of Pakistanis neither aligns with that of the IVC people, nor shares any common cultural practice
Civilizations are defined by cultures, and not political boundaries
🧵(1/n)
Pakistan claiming to be the generation of the IVC is absolutely hilarious. The socio-religious ideology of Pakistanis neither aligns with that of the IVC people, nor shares any common cultural practice
Civilizations are defined by cultures, and not political boundaries
@The5pmDrop@thetatvaindia even after apologizing for falsely calling her a 'maid',
you are still misquoting this here just to show ur inferiority complex, you are just a brown sepoy who is willing to monger hate.
A scene from the movie Citizen Vigilante that was released 12 days ago, and it's banned from screening in all of Europe 🤨
Inspired by a real Hamburg 2016 case, Hammer plays an expat who turns vigilante against migrant muslim rapists.
A must watch 👇
“Pakistan’s indigenous land”….. land which belonged to the Indian subcontinent much before Pakistan even existed.
Anyways, day before yesterday Paki s claimed to have Arab blood, yesterday Turkish blood and today Harappan blood. Interesting. how many fathers do you exactly have?
There’s a retard epidemic where retards think it makes more sense for foreigners who live thousands of miles away to have more claim over Pak’s indigenous land lived on for millennia because “common practice” (IVC was not Hindu btw). Christian Goans should claim Bethlehem next.
(6/n)
Pak's sudden push to CLAIM the IVC is only a superficially proposed baseless argument, to counter India after it having rightfully dismantled the Indus Water Treaty.
If the epicenter of terrorism continues to export terrorists, it should not expect decisions driven by law.
(5/n)
International heritage law treats ancient sites based on current sovereign territory for PROTECTION, not as a justification to CLAIM exclusive cultural ownership. Pakistan did not exist before 1947. Every territory under IVC is a subset of what belonged to the Indian SC.
(4/n)
Fire altars and evidence of ritual hearths at Indus sites align with the long-standing importance of fire in last rites performed by HINDUS in INDIA.
Do Pakistanis "claiming" the IVC, perform these practices--NO!
(3/n)
The Pashupati seal depicts a horned seated figure with animals, interpreted as an early form of a horned deity (linked to Shaivite motifs)
Terracotta and seal figures seated in meditative poses are associated with yogic practices (yoga)
(2/n)
Excavations at Harappa and Mohenjo-daro show terracotta figurines, mother-goddess images, appearance of pipal tree worship in IVC seals. These themes perfectly align with INDIAN devotional art and cultures. It is akin to the Hindu tradition which is practiced in INDIA.
🧵(1/n)
Pakistan claiming to be the generation of the IVC is absolutely hilarious. The socio-religious ideology of Pakistanis neither aligns with that of the IVC people, nor shares any common cultural practice
Civilizations are defined by cultures, and not political boundaries
(6/n)
Pak's sudden push to CLAIM the IVC is only a superficially proposed baseless argument, to counter India after it having rightfully dismantled the Indus Water Treaty.
If the epicenter of terrorism continues to export terrorists, it should not expect decisions driven by law.
(5/n)
International heritage law treats ancient sites based on current sovereign territory for PROTECTION, not as a justification to CLAIM exclusive cultural ownership. Pakistan did not exist before 1947. Every territory under IVC is a subset of what belonged to the Indian SC.