1) My wife had 200+ books sitting unread while juggling a demanding career.
She tried building a reading system in ChatGPT. It helped with ideas but couldn't remember her library or actually manage anything.
This weekend, we built her an AI-powered Reading OS using Claude Sonnet 4.5 + Notion AI.
Here's what we learned about rapid prototyping with AI tools 🧵
@trq212 My question is if:
Opus 5.5 can do what Fable 5.1 can do
and Sonnet 5.5 can do what Opus 5.5 can do. then…
where does Fable land now with all of this.
Taught kids today about the new ‘Credits’ NFT collection by @jackbutcher.
They each picked 4 different NFT’s out of the collection to draw.
Afterwards we laid all 100 unique squares into one big mosaic and calculated how many different ways the whole thing can be arranged:
100! × 4⁹⁹
A 218-digit number.
Their minds were blown. 🤯
Art + math + NFTs in one afternoon.
#pushculture #nft #jackbutcher
The efficiency and upgrades to Opus 5.5 make it so that you don’t have to depend on Fable 5.1 as the daily driver. The impact on this from a token consumption/cost perspective is underrated.
As important as the latest “frontier” model is the capability of the “Robin” or “Pippen” model is just as critical.
Without it you have a tongue wagging model that can put up 40 points a game and dunk from the free throw line but can’t get you to the finals.
With it your fans stop switching teams and your competitor’s users ask why courtside seats aren’t sold out anymore.
Credit #114072: “The Loose Glyph”
A misregistered Constructivist glyph rendered in magenta and black. Its dense central mark sits inside an unusually large white field, while a single black pixel breaks away like punctuation or a signal escaping its grid.
The composition’s defining Loose print trait appears in only about 0.8% of Credits. Combined with its uncommon 71-bit density, the same qualities that make the work visually distinctive also cause it to rise substantially under Jack Butcher’s proposed logarithmic rarity model.
It occupies a compelling space between Suprematist geometry, offset-print misregistration and early bitmap typography: less a picture than an invented symbol caught in the act of coming apart.
The efficiency and upgrades to Opus 5.5 make it so that you don’t have to depend on Fable 5.1 as the daily driver. The impact on this from a token consumption/cost perspective is underrated.
As important as the latest “frontier” model is the capability of the “Robin” or “Pippen” model is just as critical.
Without it you have a tongue wagging model that can put up 40 points a game and dunk from the free throw line but can’t get you to the finals.
With it your fans stop switching teams and your competitor’s users ask why courtside seats aren’t sold out anymore.
Since GPT 5.6 came out, Tibo gives Codex users a reset almost every week, and just a day or two later they would be back asking for another one.
But this week nobody is asking, and it's the first time I've seen Codex users this quiet. Is it because GPT 6 Sol is cheap enough that their limits finally last, or are most of them just busy trying Claude Opus 5.5?
Codex users, be honest, where are you right now?
@jackbutcher I was literally trying to figure this out for myself. would be great to have the official on from the artist.
Also curious what would go into the scoring given the flexibility of the statement composition
I just want to take this time to apologize in advance for anything any version of myself may have done to Beni in any of the billions of simulations that may or may not exist.
I suggest you do the same.
cope. seethe. rage
Welcome to the finale
I partnered with the Wall Street Journal to release this article
Probably the single worst hit piece ever written about @Kalshi
Guess people will think twice before insulting me in public again
https://t.co/3qXYwa0Dbh