@anna4fes@EdwardJDavey@LibDems How can you defend an organisation that misled a nation? How many other times have they done it? They need to take their medicine.
@JWendleken91807 They should but in the case of the post office the investigators were clearly not well trained, corrupted by financial gain that led to a catastrophic miscarriage of justice.
@JWendleken91807 It's not that simple. First the investigators need to treat the investigation objectively, follow all lines of enquiry and give the cps the full facts. Not all criminal prosecutions are dealt with by the cps. Look at the post office for example.
A new Director General will take up post at the Crown Prosecution Service this Autumn, the organisation has announced.
Julie Lennard, who has been Chief Executive Officer at the DVLA since 2018, has been appointed and is expected to take up her role as Director General and Chief Operating Officer on Monday 25 November 2024.
@DVSAgovuk Is it me, or do you see more car and trailers speeding in the third lane of the motorway?
Could this be down to the mindless scrapping of the b+e test?
@MailOnline The CCP's unjust sentences and ill-treatment of innocent citizens continue to expose their inhumanity and disregard for basic human rights. These heart-wrenching stories of suffering and mistreatment must be condemned.
CCPโ Chinese! CCPโ China!
@NjjNeal@NormanBrennan@BBCRadioLondon OK, so if a white guy complains that he was searched without good reason. An independent investigation takes place that finds the officers have been dishonest in their statements, and they were sacked. Would you still have the same view that it was all political?
@NjjNeal@NormanBrennan@BBCRadioLondon You are clouding the issue by bringing race into the argument. It is clear that all ofgicers erre cleared of any racial bias. They got sacked for making dishonest statements that could later be used in a court of law later in proceedings. This is the issue we can not tolerate
@NormanBrennan@BBCRadioLondon The confusion comes when the race of the individuals involved, including the officer's is clearly clouding peoples judgement. The facts are the officers were sacked by an independent panel who saw enough evidence to convince them that the officers lied. That is the sole reason.