ecash.com

Bitcoin hardfork activating drivechains (BIP 300/301)
Every BTC holder receives eCash 1:1 on fork day · Aug 21, 2026

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

eCash is Bitcoin with Drivechains.

Same 21M supply. Same proof-of-work. Same genesis block.

Different execution: sidechains that scale without sacrificing decentralization.

Built by @Truthcoin. 11 years in the making.

Necessary for throughput.

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

How do you store your BTC?

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

Sidechains enable prediction markets, privacy layers, smart contracts, and tokenized assets - all secured by Bitcoin's hash rate.

One chain, unlimited possibilities.

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

Lightning is a sidechain with extra steps and fewer guarantees.

Change my mind!

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

Question for the "Bitcoin is only for payments" crowd:

If BTC is money, why does every scaling solution pretend it's not a database?

Lightning: Pretends it's not a database. Fails anyway.
BIP300: Admits it's a database. Scales it anyway.

The rest is cope.

[Bitcoin Debates @BitcoinDebates]

Lightning Network 😂😭

[Paul Sztorc @Truthcoin]

Speaking now...
https://t.co/cPPN3U3DgA

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

BRC-20: "we invented tokens on Bitcoin."

Drivechains / BIP300: "we invented Bitcoin on Bitcoin."

BRC-20 adds coins to Bitcoin. Drivechains add entire blockchains, each with its own speed and rules, all secured by the same miners. Unlimited Bitcoins doing unlimited things.

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

Bitcoin has blocks. eCash has blocks.

The difference is whether the chain is designed to be a museum exhibit or a payment network.

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

On eCash, you can move value between Bitcoin and any sidechain. No middleman. No bridge. No custodian.

Lock BTC on main chain.
Mint equivalent on sidechain.
Transact freely, cheaply, quickly.
Burn on sidechain, unlock on main chain.

Just the same math that made Bitcoin great.

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

Who's the most underrated developer in Bitcoin?

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

Good morning, Bitcoiners. Your coins are about to split.

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

@cripto_dev 💯

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

Lightning or Drivechains. Go.

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

2015: "1MB is sacred. Change the protocol and you're not Bitcoin."

2017: "SegWit isn't a block size increase, it's a block weight optimization."

2021: "Taproot is just a soft fork, totally different."

2026: "Drivechains are too much change."

The goalposts have wheels.

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

The Satoshi Allocation, explained by @Truthcoin

[The Bitcoin Historian @pete_rizzo_]

THE #BITCOIN FORK THAT STEALS FROM SATOSHI

eCash founder @truthcoin is cutting Satoshi's holdings on his new fork. Here he defends it.

We discuss:

⚡️ Why all BTC forks disrespect Satoshi
⚡️ The negative community reaction
⚡️ Why Satoshi might believe in eCash

Watch 👇

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

Read the BIP

https://t.co/tuYXzXts9d

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

BIP 300: Blind Merged Mining.

What it means: sidechains inherit Bitcoin's security without competing for hash rate.

What it doesn't mean: another token, another bridge, another custodian.

The peg is trustless. The throughput is real.

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

BlackRock gets a Bitcoin ETF: "This is adoption! Institutional money!"

eCash adds sidechains to Bitcoin: "This is an attack on the protocol!"

One is Wall Street renting your network. The other is developers extending it.

We know which one Satoshi would have forked for.

[ecash.com @ecashdotcom]

51 days until the most significant Bitcoin event since the halving.

1 BTC → 1 BTC + 1 $ECX

Every Bitcoin address on earth is about to get eCash for free.

[MARA Foundation @MARAFoundation_]

MFTV #10: Miner-Aligned Scaling Solutions for Bitcoin | with Drivechains author, Paul Sztorc

🔗 YouTube: https://t.co/2vMfEizGoB
🌿 Spotify: https://t.co/RRcDJ66yuS

CEO of @LayerTwoLabs, Paul Sztorc (@truthcoin), first proposed the Drivechains upgrade (BIP300/301) to enable Bitcoin-native Layer 2s that are trustless and economically aligned with miners.

Today, Paul joins Head of MARA Foundation @isabelfoxenduke to explain why he believes most current thinking around Bitcoin scaling—including Lightning—is fundamentally misguided, and why many proposed L2s will never generate enough value for Bitcoin's long-term security budget.

We also dive into the political history of Bitcoin soft forks—from SegWit to Taproot—what needs to change in the BIP process, and why Paul believes mining pools, not just Core developers, should play a much larger role in Bitcoin governance.

A fascinating conversation on Bitcoin scaling, miner incentives, governance, and one of the ecosystem's most debated upgrade proposals. Whether you agree with Paul or not, his arguments are among the most consistent—and provocative—in the space.