@AntoBeck Sorry it’s not cringey to call your competitors on their BS. Be professional yes, but why would you think it’s not ok to ask a question? Usually everyone is thinking it. That’s my entire personality!!
@jermdemo@sunrgu Again, looks like a quarterly 10b51 sale from a board director. I would bet most of his compensation for being on the board is stock. Those are planned a year plus in advance as required for insiders.
When does it become time to buy small amounts of every nascent public NGS genomics company, as a lottery ticket to try to get the one that forms the consolidation of the industry? $NVTA $WGS $PSNL $MYGN $CNTG (hint: after q3 earnings?)
@jermdemo Those are required sales to cover taxes when RSUs vest. Announced because they are execs. Literally less than zero relation to leadership confidence.
@Bullshark_2012 I guess it’s sexier to value based on future performance of an assay because omG oNcOloGy, than it is on current volume and relationships with patients (assuming that was profitable). 🤦🏼♂️🥺
*sexier meaning assign a value > $0
@Bullshark_2012 Maybe, isn’t a liquid MRD pretty technically easy these days, but horribly expensive to commercialize? When do they start suing each other? Or when does Natera sue them….?
I still get saddened that the state of the art is 16 custom qPCRs….
@Bullshark_2012 Yup agreed. I don’t think boards will accept an offer even at 2-3x multiples to their depressed market caps…not sure what the alternatives are…
…bankruptcy, private reboot, recap, go public again?
@Bullshark_2012 The group I mentioned? If not, no one else can scalably generate and interpret cWES and cWGS. But maybe that’s the point, the economics are just bad?
@GenomicsCow Totally, and you’re right I do mean billing innovation as well.
Everyone is still running CMA on actual spotted oligos on glass slides. 🤦🏼♂️