Amazon just opened its entire logistics network, including freight, warehousing, fulfillment, & delivery, to everyone. Including its own competitors!
Why would a company voluntarily hand its infrastructure to rivals? The economics are more interesting than they look. ๐งต
@Neil_Irwin The mystifying land use is only between the Clarendon and Virginia Square metro stops.
Between Virginia Square and Ballston the land use is understandable.
Amazon just opened its entire logistics network, including freight, warehousing, fulfillment, & delivery, to everyone. Including its own competitors!
Why would a company voluntarily hand its infrastructure to rivals? The economics are more interesting than they look. ๐งต
So helping competitors lowers Amazon's own costs.
It's rational to cut a rival's logistics bill if doing so fills your network and drops your marginal cost per delivery. The rival benefits too. A classic pro-competitive offering.
@bendreyfuss If you want true architectural shock in New Haven, tour Yale's residential colleges and enjoy beautiful Collegiate Gothic and Georgian designs until you see the Modernist horrors Eero Saarinen inflicted on the campus in the 1960s (Morse and Stiles Colleges).
Full analysis: https://t.co/KjQaNgFz0u
What would change my mind: evidence domestic server assembly can scale to meet U.S. demand before 2030. If you have it, my replies are open.
92% of U.S. GDP growth in H1 2025 came from the AI data center buildout.
Phase 2 of the Section 232 semiconductor tariffs could hit it with a 15.6% construction tax.
I ran the numbers. The cost: ~$90 billion a year. ๐งต
Here's the thing: data centers are currently exempt from the tariff.
The Administration created that carveout in January because it recognized exactly this problem. Nothing in the supply chain facts has changed since.
The damage only happens if Phase 2 removes it.