Eden Lumbroso

Human

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@Edik5154 אתה אומר פה מלא שטויות, אבל בלי להתייחס לאף מפלגה ספציפית: על כל פוליטיקאי אתה תמצא לא, באופן כללי יותר בכל דבר בחיים תמצא למה לא. רוצה לזכות בלוטו? לא כי אולי זה ירחיק אותך מהמשפחה.
החיים וגם פוליטיקה זה לבחור ברע במיעוטו.
תשאל את עצמך מה היית רוצה שיהיה במדינה, ואז מי יקרב לזה

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@flappyairplanes Does this efficiency come from removing launch costs? Are those really that bad?
or something else maybe

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@DahanItan נלחמים על התשומת לב שלך

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@innerblock לא

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@SirPitta @ZuckermanRoy אם לא מצאת מחקר אתה יכול לנסות לאסוף כתבות על רופאים מוסלמים שפוגעים במטופלים ולעשות ניתוח סטטיסטי עם קלוד.
ולמה למקצוע אין חשיבות? אם יעשו סקר בחירות למשל לפי מקצוע אתה חושב שכל המקצועות יראו אותו דבר?

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@MikeE_3_14 איזה פרמטרים "שקופים" בattention? על מה מדובר?

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@ZuckermanRoy באמת שלא שמעתי עליונות דתית. תסביר?

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@SirPitta @ZuckermanRoy בנתיים שלחת מהומות שלא קשורות לרופאים ורופא אחד שגם תפסו. תחזור כשיהיו לך נתונים

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@gilileoB לא

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@SirPitta @ZuckermanRoy מה?

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@SirPitta @ZuckermanRoy תחזור אליי כשיש לך נתונים.

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@ofek_kasif לא צריך להאמין לכל דבר שיוצא לפוליטיקאים מפה... גם אם הם ערבים

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@RadmanMoshe מה תמונת הניצחון לדעתך?

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@tonywestonuk yes it does. depends on the context

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

Multiple questions to unpack:
1. what is consciousness?
2. given that an entity is conscious, should it have some rights?
3. my favorite question (in every context): what is our goal here?

One could say the goal is to minimize human suffering, and consciousness comes into the conversation because humans feel bad when they encounter an entity they consider conscious that is suffering itself. Like, people feel bad when they see an animal crying because it is hurt.

Given this, the definition could be flipped with the same outcome: An entity is conscious if it makes us feel bad when it appears to suffer. Then, trying to minimize human suffering, we should protect that being (notice we don't directly care about the conscious being itself).

Taking this definition to AI, an AI is conscious when it makes enough people believe it is indeed suffering. At that point, just because it makes people feel bad, we need to protect it from suffering (or make it unconscious by somehow convincing people they shouldn't feel bad).

Side point: In this framework consciousness is like beauty (an "edge property"). An entity is not objectively beautiful, it is "in the eye of the beholder". In other words, if you would put all people as nodes on a graph, height (for example) would be a node property, but beauty would be an "edge property" between two people. In this sense consciousness is also an edge property.

[Robert Scoble @Scobleizer]

It isn’t just RSI.

At about 300 billion parameters their neural networks start behaving more human, AI researchers tell me. Their neurons start moving around like ours do. In other words they start learning faster.

An emergent property they didn’t expect.

Which is why there are more discussions about consciousness lately. And more angst about bad things AI might soon do.

The clankers are soon gonna make us all think they are conscious.

What will you call it when you have humanoids in your home talking to you?

I don’t believe melted sand should be granted rights we hold dear as humans.

And that is the hill I will defend.

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@tonywestonuk 1. bad definition, how to test?
2. yes they do
3. so now you define consciousness as fear of death? btw AI has this

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@ValerioCapraro We can't even define consciousness. Here is an attempt though:
https://t.co/SyZXURded5

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

Multiple questions to unpack:
1. what is consciousness?
2. given that an entity is conscious, should it have some rights?
3. my favorite question (in every context): what is our goal here?

One could say the goal is to minimize human suffering, and consciousness comes into the conversation because humans feel bad when they encounter an entity they consider conscious that is suffering itself. Like, people feel bad when they see an animal crying because it is hurt.

Given this, the definition could be flipped with the same outcome: An entity is conscious if it makes us feel bad when it appears to suffer. Then, trying to minimize human suffering, we should protect that being (notice we don't directly care about the conscious being itself).

Taking this definition to AI, an AI is conscious when it makes enough people believe it is indeed suffering. At that point, just because it makes people feel bad, we need to protect it from suffering (or make it unconscious by somehow convincing people they shouldn't feel bad).

Side point: In this framework consciousness is like beauty (an "edge property"). An entity is not objectively beautiful, it is "in the eye of the beholder". In other words, if you would put all people as nodes on a graph, height (for example) would be a node property, but beauty would be an "edge property" between two people. In this sense consciousness is also an edge property.

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@Nehemia_GA אחלה ערוץ 16 116 מנדטים
וגם וואלה בעצם

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@SirPitta @ZuckermanRoy המציאות זה מה שרלוונטי. אתה מכיר נתונים שמראים שרופאים ערבים פוגעים במטופלים יהודיים באופן מכוון?

[Eden Lumbroso @Edenlum]

@FrancoisChauba1 but zero order is still bad