of journalism.
The publication, therefore, is requested to publish the rebuttal in its newspaper so that clear picture about the matter is shown to the readers/public.(1/14
designs and ulterior motives can't deter the resolve and determination of the Officers to perform their legitimate duties honestly and dedicatedly to serve the public.
Therefore, drawing a sweeping conclusion of the news item based on the personal vendedata violates ethics (1/13
Under the pressure of harrasive/ arm-twisting tactics adopted therein by any of such Contractors. Maintaining transparency, accountibility and following rules and regulations is obligatory on every Government servant and by resorting to such tactics aimed to serve naferios (1/12
after unconditional acceptance of the LOAs, execution of contract agreements with KPDCL, and failure to complete their awarded works both quantitatively and qualitatively, might have annoyed them, for which officers at the helm of affairs are not responsible, &can't succumb (1/11
mechanism of the Division, mandatorily required for the adherence of standards, technical specifications associated with the infrastructure development works as per Contract stipulations. As such their reluctance to adhere to the contract terms & conditions, binding on them,(1/10
contractors, which therefore is misleading and a wilful attempt to destroy the working and Adminstative atmosphere of ED Handwara. However, some Contractors, for their vested interests, may not be comfortable with the quality control, quantitative and qualitative monitoring (1/9)
legal action under which defamation suit could be filed before the honourable Court, to protect honour and dignity of the Govt. servants.
The correspondent in his news item, is stating that "the Contractors have alleged " and hasn't specified names of the complainant (1/8)
agony, directly impacting their performance/ decision making, is cognizable and punishable under the recently issued circular by GAD under No: 14-JK(GAD) of 2024 DT: 20/06/2024 which includes prosecution . In addition, misue of media, by the correspondent shall also attract,(1/7)
is an attempt to harass, demoralize and tarnish image of the Govt servants, bound to discharge their duties to safeguard and protect the Govt. exchequer from the revenue loss. Maligning image of any public servant by levelling baseless allegations causing mental harrasment (1/6)
repeatedly approached for an illegal favour, which given the standing regulations of the power tariff rules and supply code was rejected, infuriating the correspondent to resort to the revengeful act. Allegations levelled therein, out of the personnel anmoisity &vendedata,(1/5)
The news item, seems backlash of the heated argument the correspondent has with the concerned officers/ officials over the registration/regularization of illegal load and connections of some consumers, happened to be the relatives/acquaintance of the correspondent, who had (1/4)
in Handwara Division. The news item carried over by the correspondent, as per field enquiry, appears an arm-twisting attempt to sabatoge and derail the enforcement drive of KPDCL against the rampant Power theft, going on in the area, in compliance to the directions of Govt (1/3)
posted On: 9th July 2024, 6: by a one Dr. Ab. Qayoom.
Attention is drawn towards a news item appeared in ‘Headlines Today’ newspaper on 9th July 2924, wherein, without specifying name of the official allegations of corruption have been leveled against the officer working (1/2)