#TON_Contest
I would like to note that I have been in Telegram and Ton for a long time, and Tapgame, I have gone through everything, and I have seen a lot of Fad and Scam. After that, I saw the era of gifts-conception-disclosure-potential.But for some reason,after Pavel Durov's👇
🔱 Chapter 1: 21 Relics of the Ocean 🔱
Explorers, the Atlantic Crossing Begins.
In the heart of the Pharos, 21 relics begin to surface. Each one carries a story, a symbol, and a challenge.
This journey was built with 21 DApps, inviting explorers to earn soul-bound relics that belong only to those who’ve shown true loyalty and meaningful contribution to the ecosystem.
🌊 21 Relics
🌊 21 Partner DApps
🌊 21 mystery quests
🌊 300 SBT/relic
The first batch begins with 8 partners and will be open for only 2 weeks. Quest 1 will drop tomorrow.
Are you ready to explore deeper?
Set Sail & Reach the New World 🌊
A new wave of onchain actions is live in our campaign with @pharos_network.
Claim PHRS, swap, and provide liquidity on @FaroSwap.
https://t.co/hVEyWuGOIs
When most people talk about the Monad community, it's clear that they're only capable of building it, not making it prosper.
So here, i will talk about Monad from a different perspective, something that many people, and even its own community never highlight.
Monad documentation states that they support parallel execution, whose process or model is very similar to STM. They even acknowledge this in their documentation.
Although the STM model was discovered in 1995, it was initially only used for data synchronisation. Aptos later redeveloped it into a blockchain and introduced it as BlockSTM for parallel execution.
In other words, Monad stole the technology and did not acknowledge it. Movement uses BlockSTM openly and with permission. Even though Aptos made it open source, developers should still act ethically.
Monad has been selling and highlighting parallel execution since the beginning, even mentioning it on its website. However, they won't admit it.
But what's even funnier than this? Monad's co-founder did not refute the Aptos team's facts with valid arguments, but instead said something completely meaningless.
"you used to poop on the floor?"
As you can see, these are the characteristics that Monad and his team have had from the beginning: edgy and childish.
I have been discussing Monad in my private channel since the beginning of the year, because if I brought it up in public, I would certainly be attacked by a group of edgy people like their leader, who sets a bad example.
They haven't been communicative from the start, even on matters such as technology. What do you expect from them now? I'm not surprised to hear that many communities are ineligible for the Monad airdrop, but I am surprised that the number is so small, more than 90% of those actively involved in Monad to support them are getting nothing.
What I see now is even sadder: it's community versus community. There are those who have it, those who still benefit from Monad's inner circle and those who still hope for projects within the ecosystem, even if they only get a few roles that may not mean anything. What can you expect from them now?
I just want to ask: who are you fighting for? Who are you protecting? Something that was clearly unfair from the start? If it's for yourself, you're no better than Monad copying Aptos.
You deserve to be abandoned by everyone after this, just like Monad, which has the potential to become a dead chain. You deserve criticism. You deserve everything the community is saying about Monad right now.
This is my personal opinion. Feel free to discuss, but please note that i will not respond to comments that lack substance, as the Monad co-founder seems to do.
Good luck anw.
The Alze Airdrop: Early Access quest is now open! 🔥
Complete the quest & secure your Galxe x Alze OAT🧬
👉Join now: https://t.co/4rbLB4fWip
#Galxe #Alze #Airdrop #Web3 #OAT