The New Era on X

The X account for The New Era

[TheFoodFiles🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿💕 @budgetcookinguk]

Language matters. Here we have the NHS deliberately blurring the lines between natural food folate and this man-made compound. Folic acid is a synthetic substance that requires a chemical process to function, and calling it a mere 'vitamin' downplays its industrial production and clinical drug status.

Share & sign👇🙏
https://t.co/8Q32V5EmIh

[Dr Clare Craig @ClareCraigPath]

Have a look at this example for a child in one day.

(All without a trip to the biscuit tin).

The adult guidance limit is set at 1000 micrograms per day (based on B12 deficiency alone - there is no safe limit because other harms have not been properly measured).

[The New Era on X @EditorTNE]

Medicating a staple foodstuff - and admitting it - means that it's only a matter of time before this government faces a massive lawsuit. Remember UK Flour Millers, you'll be indicted too. In the meantime don't smoke and don't eat toxic fortified flour.

[Dr Clare Craig @ClareCraigPath]

In some senses this folic acid debate is a war within government.

One arm of gov wants to medicate the flour.
Another, the NHS, lists how it causes harm with warnings.

The first arm have just got the upper hand with the NHS capitulating on their website. 🧵

[Dr Clare Craig @ClareCraigPath]

In some senses this folic acid debate is a war within government.

One arm of gov wants to medicate the flour.
Another, the NHS, lists how it causes harm with warnings.

The first arm have just got the upper hand with the NHS capitulating on their website. 🧵

[The New Era on X @EditorTNE]

Or @HedgieMarkets ?

[The New Era on X @EditorTNE]

So @Geopolitics_Emp is this you?

[The New Era on X @EditorTNE]

The greater problem is the United Kingdom buying cyber-security and "AI" products from the United States and Israel. UK critical infrastructure is already heavily compromised. No fighter jets needed.

[Jeremy Corbyn @jeremycorbyn]

On BBC Newsnight, Victoria Derbyshire put my demand to a Labour minister: Will you end the sale of F-35 parts to Israel?

His response: antisemitism.

A disgraceful, shameless attempt to deflect from the truth: Britain is still arming the occupation and facilitating genocide.

[D. Alec Zeck @Alec_Zeck]

Has Bacterial or “Viral” Transmission Ever Actually Been Proven? A Look at the Evidence Bar Nobody Talks About

There's a claim most of us grew up accepting without ever really examining it: bacteria and “viruses” spread from a sick person to a healthy person through coughing, sneezing, and shared fluids, and that spread is what causes the same disease in the new host. It sounds so basic that questioning it feels almost absurd.

But if you actually sit down and ask what it would take to prove that claim, cleanly, scientifically, with no wiggle room, you end up with a pretty short, easily understandable list of requirements. And once you hold real research up against that list, the picture gets A LOT murkier than most people assume.

4 conditions, all of which would need to be met in the same experiment, for the claim to be considered proven rather than assumed.

1. The bacteria or “virus” has to come from a naturally sick person, by itself, free of confounders.

Not something mixed with chemicals in a lab, and not something studied only in an animal model that's just as far removed from natural conditions as the lab dish is.

The actual bacteria/“virus”, as it exists in an actual sick patient, walking around in the real world. If it is purported to be the causal agent, the causal agent must be delivered by itself.

This also matters because a lab is not a human body. Organisms grown up for an experiment are cultured in artificial media, on specific nutrient formulations, at controlled temperatures, often with antibiotics or known toxicants used to "isolate" and "purify" them, none of which exist in a human respiratory tract or a sneeze, and many of which are, themselves, known to be toxic to many living organisms, including humans. (“Viruses” continue to be in quotes here because there’s an entirely separate issue there…)

The animal models used to fill this gap don't escape the same problem. Animals in these studies are typically kept under artificial light on a fixed schedule, confined in ways that put them in a state of ongoing stress, fed lab chow instead of anything resembling a natural diet, separated from their normal herd or social group, and often housed in facilities running multiple other experiments at the same time. All of that alters typical bodily functions, stress factors, and baseline health before the supposed “pathogen” is ever introduced. So an animal model isn't a clean stand-in for "natural conditions," it's a different set of artificial conditions layered on top of an already-artificial process. If neither the bacteria/“virus” nor the host it's tested in reflects anything close to how disease actually happens in the world, the transmission experiment isn't demonstrating natural spread but rather what happens under a specific, engineered set of circumstances that may or may not translate to reality at all.

Additionally, the material transferred is rarely just the supposed “pathogen”, and rarely even just the person's own fluids. Blood and fluid from a sick person carries the suspected “pathogen” tangled up with cells, antibodies, other microbial life, decaying tissue, and foreign proteins, some of which are themselves toxic. Once that material has been through standard lab processing, it's carrying the lab's chemicals on top of all of that too, and even then, it's rarely delivered to a healthy host at all. It's typically dropped onto cells kept artificially alive in a dish, a step further removed from anything resembling natural transmission.

Introducing that whole mixture with a host of confounding variables and unproven assumptions doesn’t tell you what was the cause, and it doesn’t reflect anything happening in nature. Which brings me to my next point…

[The Jules @TheJulesMcC]

Careful when pouring hot drinks into your cake hole, it might scald the swallowing tube that empties into the tummy bag thingy.

[OffGuardian @OffGuardian0]

Some people are suggesting this whole AI panic narrative is just a seedy mindfuck riding on the back of the average person's total ignorance of how computer tech, software and coding actually works, and their concomitant willingness to believe it's basically magic.

A sort of gotcha by the technocrats at the masses they despise, who can be herded like sheep and believe any old crap their TV tells them

But we'd never suggest anything as baldly cynical as that...

I mean does this look like lowest common denominator fear porn to you?

[Dawn @DawnSunrise1]

@EditorTNE It's outrageous that so many products contain folic acid. Major manufacturers are voluntarily adding it to foods that don't even contain wheatflour. I'm folic acid intolerant and my hubby has prostate cancer. Our lives have been made so much more difficult, trying to avoid it.

[loretta @battersbyloret1]

Please sign the petition, it’s ridiculous that we even have to go down this road to not be poisoned! 😡

[David Kurten @davidkurten]

Who is behind the UK air traffic control failure?

[Jane Smith @JaneSmith13579]

@montie @Nigel_Farage @RobertJenrick Just listened. I can tell you Nigel has never been in control of the party. Everyone assumes he is because he is the face of it. Exactly same at Brexit Party. He has no interest in running a party and leaves it to others. At TBP it was George Cottrell and Richard Tice.

[D. Alec Zeck @Alec_Zeck]

Whether it’s
psych drugs,
vaccines,
statins,
or chemotherapy,

allopathic medicine is obsessed with masking or suppressing symptoms with toxic substances touted as “medicine”, all centered around entirely unsubstantiated premeses of health and how the human body works.

America has one of the most well funded, supposedly well researched, robust healthcare systems in the world, is by far one of the most drugged and allopathic-intervened, and has by far some of the worst health outcomes when compared to other industrialized nations.

[Gail Walker @GWalker9]

Vexed to hear about Stephen Walker. A first class journalist and lovely guy. His brilliant first book, Forgotten Soldiers, tells the story of 28 Irish soldiers shot for desertion. It’s a lasting memorial to a fine human being and wonderful writer

[The New Era on X @EditorTNE]

This is utterly astonishing research by @MorganC000 - could Ireland have been the beta test for the infanticide (by mother) Psyop that's currently playing in the US. Is the end-game AI based screening of mothers for potential 'postpartum psychosis'?

[theprepperguy @theprepperguy]

THE GOVERNMENT SAYS YOU WILL STILL HAVE A “CHOICE” OVER FOLIC ACID. SO EXPLAIN THIS.

From 13 December 2026, folic acid is to be compulsorily added to non-wholemeal common wheat flour in the UK at 250 micrograms per 100g of flour.

One of the government’s answers to people who don’t want to consume added folic acid is that they will still have a choice.

Their own consultation response says:

“individuals are able to avoid fortified flour if that is their choice.”
How?
The government says people can choose unfortified wholemeal flour and other non-wheat products instead.

Fine.

So I went shopping and deliberately bought Tesco Finest Sliced Wholemeal Bread.

Not white bread.

Not brown bread.

WHOLEMEAL BREAD.

Now look at the ingredients on the packet.

The first ingredient is indeed:

Wholemeal Wheat Flour

But further down the ingredients is this:

Wheat Flour [Wheat Flour, Calcium, Folic Acid, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin]

So the “wholemeal bread” I deliberately selected already contains FOLIC ACID.

That makes the government’s argument about consumer choice look considerably less straightforward than “just choose wholemeal”.

And there is an even stranger question.

Current government guidance on the Bread and Flour Regulations states:

“the word ‘wholemeal’ is only allowed in the name of the bread when all of the flour used as an ingredient is wholemeal.”

It goes on to say that a combination of wholemeal and white flour “must not be named ‘wholemeal bread’”.

Yet here I am holding a packet which says:

“Sliced wholemeal bread”

while the ingredients appear to identify both “Wholemeal Wheat Flour” and a separate “Wheat Flour” containing folic acid.

Perhaps Tesco has a technical explanation for this particular ingredient and its classification. I’d certainly like to hear it.

But put the labelling issue to one side for a moment, because the wider point matters.

The government has chosen a population-wide fortification policy The government’s response was that people would still be able to avoid fortified flour by consuming unfortified wholemeal flour and other products.

But how meaningful is that “choice” for an ordinary shopper?

Apparently it isn’t enough to walk into a supermarket and think:

“I don’t want added folic acid, so I’ll buy wholemeal bread.”

You need to turn over every packet, put your glasses on and inspect every flour ingredient to see whether folic acid has been added somewhere in the product.

And this isn’t just about loaves of bread.

Non-wholemeal wheat flour is used throughout the food supply: cakes, biscuits, pastries, pies, pizza bases, breadcrumbs, breaded chicken and fish, batter, sauces and countless processed foods.

The government itself says the folic acid must appear in the ingredients list of pre-packed products containing the affected flour.

In other words, the burden of exercising this supposed “choice” is being placed on the consumer.

I’m not arguing here about whether pregnant women should take folic acid. We already know why folic acid before and during early pregnancy is recommended.

I’m asking a different question:

If the government relies on consumer choice as part of the justification for mandatory fortification, shouldn’t that choice actually be simple, obvious and practical?

Because buying a packet prominently labelled WHOLEMEAL BREAD and then discovering FOLIC ACID in its ingredients demonstrates rather neatly why saying “people can choose wholemeal” isn’t an adequate answer.

And before somebody says “well, just read the ingredients” — that’s precisely the point.

If opting out requires checking the small print of every loaf, cake, pie, sauce, breadcrumb coating and processed product you buy, that is very different from the impression created by saying consumers remain free to choose wholemeal products instead.

This packet is a perfect example.

I chose wholemeal.

I still got folic acid.

So where, exactly, is the simple choice we were promised?
@Tesco
#folic

[The New Era on X @EditorTNE]

I had the pleasure of working with Stephen lots before I was blacklisted by the BBC in 2020 as a political commentator. Stephen and I had our disagreements but I always found him courteous, a listener and a great debater. We didn't agree on much politically but he was a thoroughly decent chap. Sad loss. And another good'un who died far too young.

[The New Era on X @EditorTNE]

Don't use sunscreen.

[Carnivore Aurelius ©🥩 ☀️🦙 @AlpacaAurelius]

so you're telling me sunscreen was invented in the 1940s, people spend 90% of their time indoors today and melanoma rates are up 6 TIMES since then....

definitely the sun causing it.