@FormulaDirecta La mayor tontería y falacia de la F1 es tener dos pilotos por escudería. Siempre acaban prefiriendo a uno. Hamilton sobre Bottas, Verstappen sobre Perez, Norris sobre Priastri. Es un secreto a voces. Mejor 22 escuderías y que se partan su madre a gusto.
AI haters vs. the AI art community
let’s be clear on a few points
• yes, AI is TRAINED on existing work
• no, AI doesn’t STEAL unless a human asks it to
• no, AI art isn’t inherently SLOP
the responsibility lies with us, the users
use this tool to create, not to copy
SPLIT STACK (1X4 grid)
Now that everyone has gotten the 3x3 grids out of their system for generating different angles, it feels like the right moment to double down on something I shared on day one of Nano Banana’s public release.
You will get more consistent results using a vertical image split into four frames (what I call a split stack), then splitting and extracting from there.
Lost detail is lost.
A 3x3 grid can give you something decent, but consistency quickly breaks down. Angles drift. Details soften. The model starts inventing what it thinks you want because its attention is split across 9, 12, or 16 frames at once.
Personally, I use 1x4 vertical grids and export each frame to 16:9 afterward.
Two reasons:
1/ It preserves detail and consistency shot after shot.
Instead of playing roulette by asking for random angles, it forces you to be intentional.
2/You describe the shot you need, the background you expect, and the framing that serves your story. Nano Banana Pro still struggles with environment rotation unless you guide it very explicitly.
You do you. But I have watched the 3x3 approach go viral a week after this method was shared, get adopted by everyone, and now I am seeing many of those same people quietly move away from it because it does not deliver on consistency.
Trends move fast. Fundamentals still matter.
SPLIT STACK (1X4 grid)
Now that everyone has gotten the 3x3 grids out of their system for generating different angles, it feels like the right moment to double down on something I shared on day one of Nano Banana’s public release.
You will get more consistent results using a vertical image split into four frames (what I call a split stack), then splitting and extracting from there.
Lost detail is lost.
A 3x3 grid can give you something decent, but consistency quickly breaks down. Angles drift. Details soften. The model starts inventing what it thinks you want because its attention is split across 9, 12, or 16 frames at once.
Personally, I use 1x4 vertical grids and export each frame to 16:9 afterward.
Two reasons:
1/ It preserves detail and consistency shot after shot.
Instead of playing roulette by asking for random angles, it forces you to be intentional.
2/You describe the shot you need, the background you expect, and the framing that serves your story. Nano Banana Pro still struggles with environment rotation unless you guide it very explicitly.
You do you. But I have watched the 3x3 approach go viral a week after this method was shared, get adopted by everyone, and now I am seeing many of those same people quietly move away from it because it does not deliver on consistency.
Trends move fast. Fundamentals still matter.
Intro made with Nano Banana + WAN 2.6 for
@CryptoGorilla and @playcambria
It was fun trying to match @playcambria aesthetic. Took me a while but it was worth it.
Making @CryptoGorilla into a game character was a chance I couldn't pass on.
@cryptogorilla My goat! The one who never walk away from crypto no matter what, always grinding. Its an honor being part of that Journey as your editor. You deserve it all.