Eric Delmonte

🇮🇹🇲🇫

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@Avocatweet Fonctionnaires messianiques !?

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@knafo_sarah Le droit administratif a très certainement oublié de prévoir dans ses dispositions l'aveu de défaillance...🫠

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@Nichma21661 La logique na jamais fait partie de l'histoire juive 😉.

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@v_lemire Lui est acculé (enfin prétendument...) mais vous êtes un parfait enculé, assurément.

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@Auriel_zy @BigEyeDayo On peut discuter des écarts de fortune dans la société en général, mais si vous les acceptez, pourquoi cela serait-il différent dans le cadre d'un divorce ?

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@BolanleStories @Auriel_zy Elle a sacrifié sa carrière pour 2 millions de dollars et rien ne dit qu'elle les aurait gagnés avec sa carrière. Mais parler de sacrifice en élevant ses propres enfants est difficilement acceptable.

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@Auriel_zy @BjornsenSteve Elle n'avait rien en arrivant, il avait déjà 5 millions. C'est aussi à prendre en compte.

[Aizenberg @Aizenberg55]

Was Israel Justified in Bombing Hamas Combatants in Their Homes?

Israel is accused of committing war crimes by killing Hamas & Palestinian Islamic Jihad commanders in their homes. With the release of NAZA, critics focus on the fact that Israel knowingly struck Hamas and PIJ combatant while civilians, including children, were present, perhaps even waiting until they returned home and calculated the expected collateral damage. They then pose their supposed decisive question: Would Israel consider it acceptable for its enemies to kill IDF soldiers in their homes?

Once again, Hamas' entire battlefield strategy is erased from the discussion and the question has to be turned back around: Where exactly was/is the IDF supposed to attack Hamas for it to be considered acceptable?

In its 400-mile tunnel network built beneath those same homes, hospitals and mosques? When Israel struck senior Hamas commander Ibrahim Biari in the tunnel network serving as the Jabalia Battalion HQ, it was condemned for causing excessive collateral damage when some buildings fell as a result. This is the prime example cited by NAZA director Yuval Abraham and that strike did not even target a home.

Should Israel attack Hamas in hospitals it used as military bases? No serious analyst denies Hamas used hospitals for military purposes, above and below ground, or that numerous Hamas combatants were killed inside them, confirmed by their own martyr notices, so it’s not credibly disputable at this point. Then the IDF is accused of "targeting healthcare" even as over 100 “healthcare workers” are now confirmed to have been combatants, again, according to their own martyr notices. What about schools, where once again Hamas and PIJ's own martyr notices confirm dozens of their operatives were based? Israel is then accused of targeting education.

I have challenged critics to name a single Hamas military base. Of course no one can do so. Now Google "List of Israel Defense Forces Bases." Everyone knows where they are, which is why Hezbollah was able to precisely strike the dining hall of the Golani training base in Oct 2024, killing four soldiers. Hamas has no conventional military bases, instead its military infrastructure is embedded in hospitals, schools, civilian homes, and mainly in massive tunnels with shafts opening into residential buildings. There is overwhelming documentation of this. At this point only the most committed Hamas apologists will deny it. Hamas combatants also fight in civilian clothes, deliberately erasing the distinction between military deployment and civilian life. They hide weapons under beds, a Hamas leader literally admitted this fact to a New York Times reporter (look it up).

So where exactly can a Hamas combatant be killed? Only when he is standing in an open field holding an RPG? What Israel’s critics effectively demand is no attack. Hamas should enjoy permanent immunity. The human shield strategy must be rewarded. This is one of the main subtexts of NAZA and its promoters.

And that is why NAZA actually demonstrates the opposite of what its promoters claim. The IDF's attempt to carefully calculate expected civilian casualties before striking Hamas commanders, even in their homes, is precisely a key element of the proportionality assessment required by the Laws of Armed Conflict. Perhaps striking a Hamas commander in his home, with known and assessed collateral damage, was preferable to striking him in a tunnel network and bringing down surrounding buildings. There is no doubt many civilians have been killed in Gaza, a tragic consequence of the war Hamas started and refused to end by surrendering and returning the hostages, and it is reasonable to assess and critique this.

Yet nobody promoting NAZA as evidence of Israeli war crimes or genocide will ever seriously examine Hamas' battlefield strategy or the alternatives available to the IDF. They condemn strikes on homes, tunnels, hospitals, and schools without ever explaining where Hamas should have been attacked instead. They demand that Israel distinguish Hamas combatants from civilians while ignoring that Hamas deliberately organized its entire military strategy to make that distinction virtually impossible to make cleanly, because it viewed civilian deaths as a strategic benefit as its leaders openly and often admitted (again, only the most committed Hamas apologists will deny this).

Now, back to the comparison with the IDF. Yes, it WOULD be acceptable for Israel's enemies to target IDF soldiers in their homes if the following were similarly true: (1) IDF soldiers did not officially transition from civilian life to military deployment as normal militaries do (2) IDF soldiers remained in civilian clothes and engaged in combat in civilian clothes (3) IDF soldiers never deployed to military bases (4) The IDF did not utilize clearly marked, sole-purpose military bases and buildings, but instead co-located them within or beneath civilian structures (5) The IDF stored military equipment in homes and rockets in schools instead of weapons depots at military bases (6) The IDF used hospitals and synagogues throughout Israel for direct military purposes. (Putting aside of course that Hamas would murder every Jew on earth if they had the ability, as if they wouldn't attack a home).

Expect the same theme to continue: the complete erasure of Hamas from the battlefield analysis.

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@LaurentALambert Il faut arrêter de fumer, vous allez voir, la récupération est rapide. Ciao.

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

Ahahah, face à sa propre ignorance, elle a craqué. Mais j'ai plein d'amis qui prendront le relais pour lui rappeler qu'on ne lui laissera pas passer le moindre élément de propagande sans la contredire.

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@LaurentALambert @ersamedb @karimbitar @UNLazzarini Vous aimez les citations et pensez en tirer argument, alors je vais vous en soumettre une qui rend inutile la poursuite de la discussion et qui clôt le débat :

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@LaurentALambert @ersamedb @karimbitar @UNLazzarini Une blague ? Prenons plutôt le témoignage de l'artisan des négociations de Camp David... Clinton, pour ne pas le nommer. Disponible pour tout le monde sur YouTube. Difficile à ignorer quand on est de bonne foi. Non, les Arabes ne se sont jamais inscrits dans le droit.

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@veguigui 🤣

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@LouFrance75 J'ai bien ri ! 👍

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@julieelmaleh1 Ils ne parlent ni des étrangers, ni d'une catégorie de la population, mais d'un phénomène dangereux : l'islamisation en le reliant à une immigration mal gérée. Un constat relatif à cette immigration, pas aux étrangers en général ni à une quelconque catégorie de la population.

[Jeff Cunningham @cunninghamjeff]

Who was first? Palestinians or Jews? The answer is not 'either or'.

In the Egyptian Museum in Cairo stands a slab of black granite carved around 1208 BCE. Its hieroglyphs celebrate the victories of the pharaoh Mernepta: “Israel is laid waste; his seed is not.”

The display makes no mention that more than three thousand years ago, an Egyptian king who knew nothing of the Hebrew Bible recorded that a people called Israel was living in Canaan.

The modern pro-Islamist claim that Jews are latecomers is historically false. Numerous ancient records refute it.

Around 840 BCE, King Mesha of Moab carved a stone boasting of his war against Israel and naming the Israelite king, Omri.

A ninth-century BCE inscription found at Tel Dan refers to the “House of David.”

In 701 BCE, the Assyrian king Sennacherib recorded his siege of “Hezekiah the Judean” in Jerusalem.

These records are written by people with every reason to ignore Israel, that confirm that an Israelite and Judean people lived in the hills of Canaan for centuries before Rome existed.

The second claim is that Palestinians are an ancient people of the region, even older than Israel. This also fails.

The word Palestine is truly old, but it never referred to the people who carry that name today. Herodotus used Palaistinē in the fifth century BCE, and it comes from the Philistines, a seafaring people who arrived on the southern coast around 1200 BCE.

A 2019 study of ancient DNA from Ashkelon, published in Science Advances, found that the Philistines brought European-related ancestry with them, and that within two centuries it had been absorbed into the local population.

The Philistines disappeared after Babylon destroyed their cities around 604 BCE. Rome revived their name in about 135 CE, after crushing the Bar Kokhba revolt, and renamed the province of Judea as Syria Palaestina.

The Arab armies came in the 630s CE, some 1,800 years after Merneptah’s scribe carved the word Israel. They brought new rulers, a language, and a religion, and over the centuries most of the population adopted all three. What we call the distinctly Palestinian national identity arrived much later.

The Palestinian historian Rashid Khalidi, no friend of Zionism, dates its emergence in his book Palestinian Identity to the late Ottoman period and the early twentieth century.

Under the British Mandate, “Palestine” was attached to any group that lived in the region, including Christians, Muslims, and Jews, that the country’s leading English-language Jewish newspaper was called the Palestine Post.
It became the Jerusalem Post in 1950.

Modern genetic studies show that both Jews and Levantine Arabs, including Palestinians, carry substantial similar ancestry from ancient populations.

But historically, the Jewish people have an independently documented presence in that land going back more than three thousand years. Palestinians are, in large part, Arab descendants of the land’s long-term inhabitants, but their national identity is about a century old.

As to the claim of who lived in the land first, between Jews and Palestinians, the answer is not close.

Anyone who stands on a campus and calls the Jews of Israel foreign colonizers in their ancestral home is arguing with a granite slab in Cairo that names a Judean king in Jerusalem nearly 1,300 years before Muhammad was born.

Stones never lie.

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@LiBERTE_LiLY_2 L'antisémitisme est irrationnel. Rien de nouveau.

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@Enthoven_R @J_Bardella Pas faux.

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@LiBERTE_LiLY_2 Je vous emmène :-).

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@rglucks1 Les seuls à avoir interdit aux Arabes dits palestiniens d'avoir un État, ce sont eux-mêmes. Ils bafouent depuis 78 ans tous les principes, aussi bien ceux de la vie que ceux du droit. Ils en payent le prix aujourd'hui. Ne perdez pas votre âme pour une élection déjà perdue.

[Eric Delmonte @EDmontAv]

@darquandier Le "infiniment plus vaste" me laisse songeur quant au concept de l'infini.