Ep @edvardperlaki - Twitter Profile

🇬🇧BRITISH CENSORSHIP 2.0: THE ONLINE SAFETY ACT First, they said it was for the children; now they say it’s for national security. Welcome to the UK’s Online Safety Act - where the government claims to be saving kids but is actually just gagging adults. This law isn’t about stopping pedophiles or protecting fragile minds from digital horrors. It’s about policing thought. Full stop. They took “harmful but legal” speech - one of the most absurd phrases ever uttered in a democracy - and made it a justification for government overreach. Orwell is facepalming in his grave. Criticize immigration policy? Get flagged. Question the government's pet narratives? Congratulations, you’ve made the watchlist. This isn’t content moderation - it’s ideological sanitation. Regulators, now armed with a censorship sledgehammers, get to decide what’s too spicy for the public palate. And if platforms don’t comply, they’re hit with fines so massive they’ll preemptively delete anything with a whiff of controversy. Bye-bye, dissent. Hello, sanitized sludge. It’s already happening. Posts about migrant hotels, flagged. Comments on crime stats? Suspicious. TikTok users in Blackpool get monitored not for inciting violence, but for expressing frustration. That’s not law enforcement - it’s digital babysitting with a political agenda. Remember when the UK stood for free speech? When Hyde Park’s Speaker’s Corner meant something? Now it’s a corner of the internet you’re not allowed to speak in unless you’ve passed a vibe check from bureaucrats. They say they’re fighting disinformation, but what they’re really fighting is disagreement. And platforms? They’re folding. Gab blocked UK users entirely. Wikipedia went to court just to avoid fingerprinting its editors. Even AI platforms are throttling content in anticipation of triggering some bureaucratic snowflake. This is the kind of thing you expect from autocracies: hide the iron fist inside a plush teddy bear. “We’re just protecting children,” they coo, while building the infrastructure to criminalize unpopular opinions. If the government wanted to protect kids, it would fund schools and crack down on rape gangs, not deputize TikTok to spy on your political takes. And the best part? No one voted for this. No public referendum, no real debate - just a bunch of politicians nodding along as the country’s speech rights got strangled in a velvet noose. The Online Safety Act was never about safety. It’s about obedience. Dressed in virtue, executed with force, and sold with the insult that it’s for our own good. Sources: The Sun, The Guardian, Washington Post, Wikipedia, UK Government, TechRadar