Comment: "it goes to show you how pathetically weak white people are that they can be mogged and bullied by blacks that don't even make up 1% of the population. Big bad cowboy Montana lol!"
Response: Hold your tongue. I used to work as a ranch hand in Montana before I moved to NY in 1980.
When I was growing up in Montana, it wasn't this way. Montana was populated strictly by Whites and American Indians and was on the opposite end of the political spectrum.
But since then, Montana has been filling up with rich white "yuppies" escaping from the tax burdens created by their own politics in places like California and New York and the west and east coasts in general (along with libtard strongholds like Illinois and Colorado).
Also bear in mind that urban police forces are no better in Montana than they are anywhere else these days. All their paymasters have to do is threaten to fire them, and they'll turn on their own families and friends rather than lose their pretty blue costumes and shiny little badges. This puts them squarely on the side of the "persecuted minorities" they're told they must protect from "White Supremacists" when they receive their training in Israel or equivalent.
Decades ago, when the FBI began training its personnel in Israel of all places, they were being told that the US was a bastion of White-racist terrorism, and assured that George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and other US Founding Fathers were vile White Supremacists in need of suppression. (My initial source was one of their training videos that was circulating on the Internet back in the late 1990s and 2000s.) That's how we ended up with the likes of James Comey as FBI Director.
Modern cops aren't the Irish-American beat-paddies of yore, but a national autoimmune disease. When I was bar bouncing in NY, a Black coke dealer could set up shop in a dark corner of the bar, the police could be called, and any Whites who had tried to dissuade the drug dealer, including bouncers, were threatened with arrest (or arrested). If officially ordered to do so, urban cops would have shat a rainbow brick on command, and now they're even worse. Blame the enforcers and their bosses for this travesty, not indigenous Montanans.
The vast majority of Montana locals want all of these newcomers gone, and permanently. If it hadn't been for the rapacious Montana Chamber of Commerce ("Welcome to Big Sky Country! Make sure you bring plenty of money!") and the State University system, the libtard yupsters would never have gotten wise to Rocky Mountain living in the first place, and Montana would still look pretty much like it used to.
Trump or no Trump, unvetted nonwhite migrants are still being shipped in by the hundreds of thousands and strategically distributed throughout the United States. In fact, well after Trump was elected, we suddenly got a load of them right across the street in an all-White town with a population of under a thousand and a county of three thousand.
What a loss, and it's only getting worse. We've been / are being methodically set up for total destruction.
It's now or never, folks.
This is happening a lot lately.
Blacks living in black cities with black mayors and a black administration have a power outage or some other infrastructure failure...
... and then they blame white people.
There aren't any white people left in your city, you dumb fucking animal. They all moved away to cities where they maintain their own infrastructure for themselves.
Why can't you people do that? Rhetorical question. Answer in image.
The implication is that we are interchangeable meat-sacks, and they're a divinely ordained family that remains whole.
For years, people said this could be ignored, but it's clear that if you organize without due reverence for their demands, they simply won't stop coming after you.
We should all thank Adam Posen and the Cato Institute for being so forthright. Watch it over and over again. Let it settle in what this man is saying. He is being 100% truthful here; he absolutely believes this. He has clearly identified his enemy, in public, on a panel, boldly, for everyone to hear. Thank you, Adam, for your candor.
Woke 1 was about race and identity.
The loose coalition of far-right and conservatard right won because you can’t out-debate reality. The far-right took on the race argument while conservatards took on the gender identity low-hanging fruit argument.
Woke 2 is about class and economics. It’s going to be interesting because the far-right actually agrees with the problems brought up and maybe even some of the solutions (except from a nationalist angle) while conservatards deny reality on both of these topics.
Imagine that you're on a sailboat going across the pacific. It's the 1500s. There are no radios.
Everybody on the boat has a job. You cannot sail the boat by yourself. You need the crew or you will die. Your job is to be in charge of the food supply.
The crew says they are having cod for dinner. You tell them the cod is spoiled, and it could kill them. They will have to catch something else or eat whatever they have in storage.
The entire crew lashes out at you. They tell you that you are evil and stupid. They say that you want them to starve. They say that you are entitled for wanting something better than cod for dinner. They say you want to keep all the cod for yourself. Their accusations don't make any sense but they keep coming.
None of them understand what spoilage is or why it could hurt them.
You try to explain.
Not only will they not listen, but they become more aggressive every time you try to prevent them from killing themselves.
Eventually, they either lock you up, throw you overboard, or you simply stop talking and wait for them to poison themselves and die.
Every intelligent person on Earth right now knows that everyone has already eaten the poison. We are waiting for them to die.
We do not know what we are going to do alone on the ship after that.
Women are more violent than men.
Women are aroused by violence. They love violent men. They bait men into violence so they can select the winner because they think it's hot.
This should not be a surprise! Every other animal does this, from deer and lions to birds, reptiles, and lobsters. Does will LITERALLY "lead on" a buck until another buck fights him for her.
The less mature a woman is, the more she will behave this way, because it is her nature. If you date the wrong girl, she will flirt with other men in front of you to get them to fight you over her.
This is why bratty, undeveloped women hate criminal justice. They do not want the law to protect tame men (icky) from violent monsters (like my romance novels!)
However, violent monsters cannot create a functional society.
The solution? Become a violent monster and then become a good person on top of that.
Every woman wants a man who can play board games and write poems and cook dinner with her, and then immediately blow the limbs and heads clean off of 6 home invaders without flinching, dispose of the bodies without calling the cops, and then make her a cup of cocoa to calm her down after the loud noises.
It takes some work to be that guy, but it's worth it.
The only problem with this strategy is that the law does not allow white men to defend themselves or anyone they love. Blacks and arabs and hispanics are free to commit all the violent crimes they want, but white self-defense will get the book thrown at you.
This is how far women have gone in their bloodlust. This is how violent women truly are.
It is no longer enough for you to mangle home invaders or knock out some street pervert. They voted for the police to punish you for that. They now require you to take on the entire law enforcement system and win.
You better be lifting weights, learning to shoot and move at the same time as naturally as you drive a car, and forming close relationships with your neighbors who can do the same.
Oh, and get radios in case they shut off your cell phone in times of trouble.
Case in point of this is Buckley berating Ian Smith for not believing in equality and mass democracy
Conservatism is really on a workable worldview when used, as used by Burke, to defend a functioning natural hierarchy and the sort of men with an understanding of duty and public virtue that lead such a system
So conservatism naturally died out as anything workable in post-War Between the States America, as such a hierarchy was mostly crushed in the South and the North decided to lean into speculation and greed on a previously unimaginable scale
At that point, what is conservatism supposed to conserve? As Russell Kirk notes, "Only vague cautionary impulses guided the South after 1865, combining with popular distrust of the negro, and lack of material resources, to slacken the rate of social alteration. The modern South cannot be said to obey any consciously conservative ideas--only conservative instincts, exposed to all the corruption that instinct unlit by principle encounters in a literate age. The affection for state sovereignty, the duties of a gentleman, and the traditions of society which Randolph and Calhoun extolled found their finest embodiment in General Lee; and, with Lee, these ideas yielded to superior force at Appomattox."
Conservatism could last somewhat longer in Britain, as it had such an elite and functioning natural hierarchy until the early 20th century, but then that too died out. This left only a few colonial societies--namely Rhodesia--still standing up for the virtues and values of the Old World. Rhodesia could properly do so as a conservative society, as it was still led by excellent men and built around a functional natural hierarchy
This caused types like Buckley to freak out, as they perceived conservatism to be a matter of tax rates rather than a development of thought meant to protect and defend a traditional functioning society
The Civil Rights Act was the clear beginning of white genocide in the USA.
Bringing black slaves to America was a bad idea. Releasing them without sending them back was a bad idea. Giving them rights was a fucking terrible idea.
But the Civil Rights Act made it strictly illegal to even avoid them.
Look at this photo. White soldiers pointing guns at White students and forcing them to go to school with blacks.
Would India ever send Indian soldiers to point guns at Indian students and make them go to school with pakistanis?
Would Muslims send Muslim soldiers to point guns at muslim students and make them go to school with jews?
What would be the point of that? Why would you force your own people to mix with people that they don't want to mix with?
Well, of course the answer is that these soldiers are being paid. If you can find enough stupid, selfish bullies, they will do whatever you pay them to do. As long as you pay enough.
So who paid them, and why? Who created the Civil Rights act? Why did they want it to become law?
Do these students look like they voted for this? Or does this look like they're being forced?
If you think about this for longer than 10 seconds and you're not retarded, it becomes obvious that America did not choose integration and immigration. They try to make it sound like people wanted this. If that was true, why did they need guns?
You can have any opinion you want about race. I can't stop you. But you cannot tell us that we chose this. This was an act of war.
You and your ancestors are one people.
Our spirts do not come from some universal lottery of souls. As if our birth was some lucky accident.
You could only have been born of your father and mother and no other. And only at your time.
You are the product of your dear ancestors and all the decisions they made, including who they married, how they behaved, and whether they had children.
You and your ancestors are part of the same chain, stretching backward to the first man and forward into infinity.
Part of the same biological process.
Part of the same spiritual continuum.
And the Haitians are governed by the same rules of inheritance.
They and their nations are the product of the decisions of their ancestors, both good and bad.
If their people, if their nations, are a mess, that is their ancestors’ fault, and, in turn, now their fault.
Just as it is our fault, and our ancestors’ fault, that our nations are now in decay.
Now we must fix our nations, just as they must fix theirs.
And it is not their responsibility to fix our nation, nor our responsibility to fix theirs.
So let them return to their homes and solve their own problems while we solve ours.
Franco used Moroccan troops (he had been a commander… in North Africa… of a mixed Moroccan and Spanish force…) to crush the left who were massacring priests/nuns all across the nation and destroying Spain.
The Moroccans then went home, and he didn’t flood his country with brown people.
Franco’s Spain was 99.5% Spanish, the overwhelmingly majority of the 0.5% were other Europeans.
Franco failed to secure a proper succession, but he was facing near-impossible odds. This is the only critique one can really have of him on this matter. Spain was a tiny right wing island trying to exist in the postwar sea of insane liberalism. His only logical successor was assassinated, almost certainly with outside help.
*Americans who haven't experienced war in 6 generations*
"War is terrible! Civil War is the worst thing that could ever happen. We have to lick the boot of tyrants. because War is so horrible. Ask anyone who's experienced war. they'll tell you!"
People who went through civil war in the 90s:
Every country in history has been "supremacist" for the men who founded it
White men, uniquely, chose to give up their institutional supremacy
You'd think egalitarians would praise White men for this, but they hate us
We'll remember that the next time we face a similar choice
Let's take a walk through the "American justice system," shall we?
Sharmake Omar is the Somali man who filmed Shiloh Hendrix on the playground in Minnesota that day in April 2025.
In January 2022, he and another Somali man "allegedly" spent two days raping an underage foster care runaway in a trailer, keeping her falsely imprisoned.
In March 2025, all charges were dismissed "in the interest of justice."
Weeks later, in April 2025, he turned his camera phone on at the playground after a young Somali thief attempted to steal from a White mom, Shiloh Hendrix, and began haranguing that White mom for having said the word "nigger." Omar demanded that Hendrix repeat the word on camera, which she did - four times, while Omar himself said the word five times in the less-than-one-minute video.
Four long months later, multiple "disorderly conduct" charges were maliciously brought against Shiloh Hendrix for the playground incident in which she was the only victim, and Sharmake Omar was the videographer.
Then, last night, Shiloh Hendrix was CONVICTED - specifically for saying "nigger" to Sharmake Omar AFTER he demanded she say it, while he himself said it repeatedly. Her sentence is a $1,000 fine and 200 hours of community service.
By the way, Sharmake Omar WAS NEVER CALLED TO TESTIFY in the Hendrix trial.
But don't worry, that's not all the justice we have in store for today. Just keep the substance of Shiloh's "crime" - as well as her sentence - in mind as we move forward.
Rewind to April 2020. That's when Sharmake Omar, our favorite Somali videographer, along with another Somali friend of his (separate from his alleged co-raper), committed a violent assault in the street. Omar threw a rock at a car, then attacked and beat the 16-year-old driver. A bystander tried to intervene, but Omar's accomplice threatened him with a knife.
For this, Sharmake Omar was charged merely with DISORDERLY CONDUCT. Yes, for hurling a deadly weapon at a vehicle, then beating the teenage driver while his criminal pal held off onlookers at knifepoint, Omar faced the EXACT SAME CHARGE that Shiloh Hendrix faced for saying a word that Omar asked her to say, as she held her child in her arms and fled the playground before Omar could assault her, too.
Like Shiloh Hendrix, Sharmake Omar was convicted on his count of disorderly conduct.
His sentence?
A $200 fine.
That's it. That's the entire thing.
So, to review:
Rape an underage foster child for two days (allegedly)? Clean slate.
Hurl a deadly weapon at a car and assault its driver? $200.
Say a word to an accused rapist/kidnapper and convicted violent criminal who demands you say it while saying it himself? $1,000 and 200 hours - not to mention international infamy.
Could the anti-White standard be any more egregiously in our faces?
Seriously, everyone involved in prosecuting the Shiloh Hendrix case is unspeakably evil. This includes, but is not limited to:
~ Rochester City Attorney Michael Spindler-Krage
~ Lead prosecutor Nicholas Shabel
~ Judge Christa Daily, who ensured Shiloh's conviction
~ The Rochester NAACP
~ Rochester's "Community Engagement Response Team"
~ Rochester Mayor Kim Norton
~ Rochester City Council President Randy Schubring
~ Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison
~ Minnesota's Council on American-Islamic Relations
~ Sharmake Omar, without whom none of this would have happened
~ The young Somali thief's non-English speaking parents
~ Innumerable members of the local Somali scam network
~ Six jurors - two men and four women (reportedly all White) - who unanimously agreed that White people are not protected under the US Constitution
While we're here, a special dishonorable mention must go to every single "FIRST AMENDMENT" organization in this hollowed-out country of ours. You know the ones - they relentlessly solicit and collect large sums of money to "DEFEND FREE SPEECH" while continuously, cravenly shrinking away from EVERY meaningful case where White people - LITERALLY THE ONLY GROUP WITH MAJORITY SUPPORT FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT - are so clearly maliciously persecuted.
Similarly, NOT ONE official at any level of government has spoken up to defend Shiloh Hendrix or her Constitutional rights, nor to condemn the flagrantly anti-White, utterly unconstitutional witch hunt she's endured. Not one.
And on that note, we conclude today's review of the good ol' "American justice system."
Lady Justice isn't blind. She's anti-White. And it's never been plainer to see.
Social Capitalism, Not Hyper Capitalism
Our modern society is being led by idiots with MBAs. They have become seduced by proxy metrics like GDP, LTV/CAC, and quarterly shareholder earnings and see the world solely through the lens of "how does one make profit?"
But society was not created to generate profit. It feels both painfully obvious yet painfully necessary to point out that the goal of society is to serve the flourishing of its people. And none of these different proxy metrics for profit are a measure, nor a replacement for human flourishing
We are a society no longer run by a leadership class who love their people, but a merchant class who see the American people as cattle, whose purpose is nothing more or less than to serve the economic system
But such an existence is not sustainable. Both in that a society which does not serve its people will slowly collapse due to stagnation, corruption, and apathy, but that people will seek alternatives
If there is one thing I know about Americans, we are not tolerant of being mistreated. And while I think many of our grievances of late have been directed at the wrong people, more are starting to realize what we briefly got right in 2008 during Occupy Wall Street: the criminals of our time wear suits
Our war is not a kinetic war. It is a war of spreadsheets and new headlines. They tell you not to have children, focus on your career, and that true happiness comes from the material possessions you purchase with the years of your life you burn in front of the screen or at your workstation in service to profit
They steal the value you generate through taxes, inflation, and other forms of theft. They discount consumer goods like TVs and phones, but the cost of healthcare, rent, and insurance goes through the roof of the home you will never be able to afford
You don't get ahead in such a system by working a 9-5 harder
Our solution lies in a mindset shift. Understanding that it is not economic capital, but social capital that we must be cultivating. That in our parents' pursuit of wealth, they burned the social fabric of our country to the ground and that reclaiming society from the corporate criminals starts with rebuilding that social fabric
Social capital can be cultivated by those without economic capital. It cannot be taxed, inflated, or otherwise stolen. It only requires that you find men you trust to invest that social capital in
And so that is where this revolution must start, in the finding of good men and the rebuilding of social fabric. The realization that we cannot do this as a loose collection of ideologically aligned individuals, but must relearn how to form fraternal networks and the bonds of trust that are the fundamental building blocks
If you know my work, you know this is the drum that I constantly beat: Build Fraternal Networks!
Nothing else can be done if we do not come together, build trust, and work together to reclaim, or more likely rebuild, a society that truly serves the American people
I hope you join us