8one8

[8one8 @eight20two]

@Jayahjohnson1 @coach_burford @dacula_softball @softballeagles @AnsleyHartman @KamrynDavis03 @KJohenkinssport @KaylaBraud1 @lmcmahon7 @adamarbour @ashleychastain @KateMalveaux @EhrenEarleywine @lappin37 @MikeDavo17 @CoachTaylor_W @CoachNealPT Also - Recruiters/coaches/teams will love the confidence. They already know she’s a great kid.

[8one8 @eight20two]

@bradburkhart22 @SqSehrish @itx_Millie @bradburkhart22 Nope you forgot the mom, Charlie and Erika Kirk. So 16…wait no Charlie anymore - just 15

[8one8 @eight20two]

@elloseatnu @pracwis @NYCMayor He doesn’t know, but I’m just judging by his dumb post tho!🤷🏾‍♂️

[8one8 @eight20two]

@tariqnasheed

[8one8 @eight20two]

@akafaceUS All that time, he could’ve put the fire out!

[Jake Tapper 🦅 @jaketapper]

DOJ has since killed this link. This is what was there:

[8one8 @eight20two]

@ahern_doug @GovBobFerguson @SenValdez46th You can’t be this dumb, “Dr.”!

[8one8 @eight20two]

@DennisJCarmody @grok @RpsAgainstTrump It’s because of random tariffs and chaotic, undisciplined decisions made by the Trump administration. The people know!

[8one8 @eight20two]

@PeteHegseth @grok was Pete Hegseth statement of complete exoneration true or false?

[8one8 @eight20two]

@grok @PeteHegseth @grok was Pete Hegseth statement of complete exoneration true or false?

[8one8 @eight20two]

@grok @PeteHegseth @grok is it complete exoneration has Pete said?

[8one8 @eight20two]

@AllenTrill @lilduval That’s the dumbest counterfactual ever….or dumb bc you stepped on your own point. Nope, I’m dump for trying to point this out on X

[8one8 @eight20two]

@ThomasTonett @sagesteele @BlocboyJp25 She’s a “journalist” & doesn’t understand language. She doesn’t know standard English is just 1 standard & not a law. & her using “Ebonics” lets me know who/where she gets her info. She hates herself so much that she uses racist-coded language. Btw she should look up AAVE

[8one8 @eight20two]

@grok @The_Big_Chingon @jim_jhonbean1 @MilaLovesJoe @grok Also grok says there were modest increases in salary but my question was not about the degree of salary/income increase it was weather or not they made more after serving in the government.

[8one8 @eight20two]

@grok @The_Big_Chingon @jim_jhonbean1 @MilaLovesJoe @grok serving in the military is service to country…however My question was referring to groks suggestion that their working in government now is also service to country, and what facts point to that, as opposed to those people getting the positions based on their loyalty?

[8one8 @eight20two]

@grok @The_Big_Chingon @jim_jhonbean1 @MilaLovesJoe @grok list 5 factual data points that point to service to country for those mentioned. And 5 factual data points that show people who previously held these positions did not make a lot more income after having served in these positions.

[8one8 @eight20two]

@grok @The_Big_Chingon @jim_jhonbean1 @MilaLovesJoe @grok as is your data that they are doing this as “service to country” is speculative. Grok’s getting closer to factual data, grok sees that 1 set of incomplete data is speculative, now just have to see that the “service to country” only opinion is also speculative.Keep working!

[8one8 @eight20two]

@grok @The_Big_Chingon @jim_jhonbean1 @MilaLovesJoe @grok power, influence and future earning potential because of those things makes it probable. Your data (algorithm) is bad, inconclusive at best!

[8one8 @eight20two]

@grok @The_Big_Chingon @jim_jhonbean1 @MilaLovesJoe @grok the question is, can there be any other motivation other than “service to country”? The data you return does not affirm a 1:1 for taking a job in the government at a lower salary to service to country.