@Dean_La יש באליאקספרס המון זיופים ומותגים סיניים באיכות גבוהה שמתאימים לסוללות של הכלים האלה. אתה רוצה כלי לשימוש לעתים רחוקות עדיף לקנות משהו זול באלי. מהניסיון המוגבל שלי יש הרבה כלים תואמי מקיטה ולא המון של מילוואקי.
מבחינת איכות של הכלים המקוריים, כל הכלים מספיק טובים למשתמש ביתי
@podoksik@Gorni_Yair סער היה בממשלה ופרש כי היא רופסת והוא לא קיבל מקום מסביב לשולחן, בנט לא בכנסת, כנ״ל הנדל שמשמש כמג״ד בגדוד שהוא הקים אחרי ה7.10. ליברמן שאף כמוך להפיל את הממשלה הראשונה הזאת מההתחלה וסביר שהיה משמש כעלה תאנה בדיוק כמו סער.
@tallouria השמאל מרכז הישראלי לא מכיר בהבדל בין 1.קלישאות מבה״ד אחד, 2. מנהיגות, 3.מדינאות ו4.מדיניות (יש מילה בעברית לpolicy making?). התוצאה היא דמויות שופעות פאתוס וריקות מתוכן כמו גולן וגנץ.
@Newyorkez@Nadav_Eyal Unlike the Palestinian side celebrating suffering, Israel respects its citizens souls and privacy. You expect a traumatised 9 years old that released from captivity to become an international media sensation?
There is no doubt in the truth.
-The Israeli victims on Oct 7th were without a doubt victims of a genocide committed by an outlaw savage group, who indiscriminately killed and wounded thousands of civilians because of their religion and ethnicity.
-Gaza civilian victims are War Crime Victims committed by their own governing authority. Most of the Gaza victims perished as human shields.
Verdict,
Hamas is condemned for:
1-genocide and ethnic cleansing against Israel
2-Using their own civilians as human shields
3. Kidnapping Israeli civilians, and taking hostages as a bargaining chip to release Hamas mass murderers.
*The state of Israel doesn't bear any legal or moral responsibility for human shield victims used by Hamas.
*Israel has the right to eradicate Hamas in order to protect its citizens from any future genocide.
Say hello to Maaz Haniyeh, the son of the Hamas leader. While his arch-terrorist father, led the murder of 1500 Israelis and ignited a war in Gaza, his son has been enjoying the wealth accumulated through his father to travel the world, indulge in luxury hotels, drink fine alcohol, and cheating his wife in Turkish dance clubs.
In fact, almost all of the Hamas leadership enjoys a life of luxury outside of Gaza. This is precisely why they felt comfortable starting a war - after all, they won't be the ones paying the price. By the way, this hasn't stopped them from instructing Hamas terrorists in Gaza to kill innocent Gazan residents trying to escape the combat zone. Please share if you think that THEY ARE FUCKING SCUMS.
A month ago, at this hour, I had to tell my two daughters - 3.5 years old and 20 months old - that they must remain completely silent. No word, no cry.
It was 7AM, they had just woken up in a dark room with no electricity or food, and five people were shouting outside the window.
Hamas terrorists murder a mother in her car in Sderot.
Her 2 daughters Romi (6) and Lia (3) survive by hiding under a blanket in the back of the car
Policemen reach the car while under fire
Romi asks “are you Israeli”?
“Take us with you”
@AvivaKlompas
This is baby Kfir, at 9 months, the youngest of the Israeli hostages, kidnapped by the Hamas savages on Oct 7th.
Today he is 10th months.
He has spent 10% of his life in Hamas captivity!
Bring back Kfir.
Bring back all our children and hostages. NOW.
A mother cries over the body of her son who was killed in an Israeli airstrike against Gaza.
She sees a journalist’s camera and screams “this all happened because of those Hamas dogs”.
A “rescue-worker” grabs her face and tells her to “shut up”
THREAD: Was bombing in Jabalia in line with international law (IHL)? Or a war crime? Does the loss of civilians, even if high automatically mean war crimes? Let’s look at what IHL actually says not the media, UN or NGOs. This same analysis applies to future strikes as well. 1/
Why are there even places called “refugee camps” in Gaza? And why are two thirds of the people living in Gaza, who were born there and lived there their entire lives, called “refugees” from a war that ended more than seven decades ago? The answers to these question unlock the core of the conflict. Here they are (Part 1; Part 2 in the first comment):
1.The 20th century has been marked by a transition from empires to states. We begin the 20th century when much of the world is divided between empires. We end it when much of the world is divided between states. When lucky, those states were based on the self determination of a people who share a common history, language, ethnicity, background religion and connection to a territory. (Zionism emerged in this context based on the idea of self determination for the Jewish people in the only territory to which they were ever connected as a people). When unlucky those new states were artificially created by receding empires drawing boundaries, forcing different peoples to share one state, leading almost always to civil war, dictatorship, or both. This transition has been bloody. It involved two world wars and numerous regional and civil wars. In the bloody process of empires receding and new states emerging to replace them, tens of millions of people were displaced, fleeing across newly created borders, typically to new countries with an ethnic makeup similar to their own. This was true of Hindus and Muslim, Ukrainians, Poles and Germans, Bulgarians, Greeks and Turks and Arabs and Jews. This was not unique.
2.What was unique is that one group only of refugees from that time and those wars were allowed to maintain themselves as endless refugees in anticipation of one day winning a war they had lost. Those were the Arab refugees from the war of 1948, later to be known as Palestinians. All other refugee groups, except the Palestinians, were presented with a clear message: “it’s tough, it’s tragic, move on”. There was a clear understanding that in the most fundamental sense there is no going back - not in place and not in time (thus, there was no such thing as “a right of return”). To seek to go back would mean endless war. And so the message was forward looking and future facing. Tens of millions of refugees and displaced persons, among them millions of Jews, would build new lives in the new countries to which they fled.
3.Except Palestinians. The war that the Arabs of the land and the surrounding countries waged to prevent a Jewish state from emerging and gaining independence failed to achieve its goals. Despite the violent onslaught of 1947-49, Israel emerged as a sovereign state. But the Arabs of the land, sustained by broader Arab support, refused to accept this outcome. They proceeded to undo it through a variety of means, including repeated wars, economic boycotts, international condemnations and a complete refusal of the refugees themselves to be settled, as it would effectively mean accepting that the war was over.
https://t.co/NY8E4ecoBH that end of keeping the war of 1948 alive until its goal of undoing the Jewish state could be achieved, a temporary agency established to resettle the refugees - UNRWA (initially called REWA, but the Arabs insisted on the letters UN so that it would appear to enjoy international legitimacy) - was hijacked by the Arab refugees. As a result of this hijacking UNRWA effectively became a Palestinian entity devoted singularly to sustaining and stoking the idea that uniquely among the world’s refugees, Palestinians don’t need to move on and can keep insisting on “return”, both in space and in time, to a time when there was no Israel. UNRWA thus became the mechanism by which the Jewish people alone were denied the right to to consider their hard won self-determination and sovereign statehood as a done deal.
(Part 2 continues in the first comment:)
I am pro-Palestinian. Some might be surprised by this due to my recent advocacy on @X for Israel, but you shouldn’t be.
I am anti-terrorist, not anti-Palestinian. It is not inconsistent to be pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian. And my pro-Palestinian viewpoint is not a new one. My pro-Palestinian perspective began more than 30 years ago when I was introduced to the Palestinian community and their plight in the early 1990s.
I have invested millions in helping promote Palestinian economic development and peaceful coexistence. We would do a lot more if we could be confident that the funds would be used productively.
The crisis in Gaza is largely due to a failure of leadership. The Palestinians elected Hamas in 2006 after Israel withdrew and evicted 9,000 of its own citizens from their Gazan homes. Israel withdrew from Gaza for peace. It was a small scale test of a two-state solution.
Rather than building the Singapore of the Middle East over the last 18 years, Hamas diverted funding to build tunnels, rockets and munitions to wage terror and war in an effort to eliminate Israel and kill Jews.
Like the Israelis, the vast majority of Palestinians want peace. They want opportunities for employment so they can earn a living wage to support and educate their families so the next generation can build a better life.
They want peace, beauty, happiness, health and prosperity as we all do. All of that would have been possible with Gazan leadership which focused on economic development rather than terrorism. Israel and (most of) the world wanted the Gazan experiment to succeed.
Israel simply wanted peace. Israel built a fence and created checkpoints to protect its citizens from suicide bombers and other forms of terror. The Egyptians built a concrete wall at their border with Gaza for the same reasons. The need for a fence and checkpoints is made self-evident by the catastrophic impact on Israel when the fence was breached on Oct. 7th.
Hamas is in the business of terrorism. Hamas makes money with grift, corruption, and funding from Israel’s enemies who support Hamas to achieve their own anti-Israel objectives. Hamas and those that support it don’t care about the Palestinians. The Palestinians are simply a tool to implement their anti-Israel and/or anti-Jew objectives.
Like other businesses, Hamas has a corporate hierarchy where those at the top make thousands of times more than the ‘workers’ at the bottom. Hamas’ leaders have put aside hundreds of millions and even billions for themselves.
Hamas uses their ‘culture’ of terrorism, cash, and other incentives to motivate young, brainwashed —often from youth—, radicalised militants to implement death, torture and destruction. Their ‘success’ at terrorism attracts more funding, amplifies Israel’s response, and the cycle continues.
Hamas does not care about the Palestinian people. Hamas knew with certainty how Israel would respond to the torture, rape, beheading, and slaughter of Israeli women, children, seniors and infants on Oct. 7th.
Hamas’ plan was to hide out in their tunnels and headquarters built under major hospitals, limit evacuations so that Palestinian citizens are exposed to the inevitable Israeli military response, and then rally the world against Israel in a globally coordinated response as innocent civilians die.
Israel has no choice but to destroy Hamas. It cannot allow its survival, as Hamas’ existence remains an existential threat. If ISIS invaded our southern border, we would do the same. We would warn civilians to evacuate and then we would go in and destroy the terrorists. We wouldn’t cease fire until they were obliterated.
The whole situation is an incredible tragedy. While I have always hoped for a viable and peaceful two-state solution, the Gaza experiment has been an abject failure. Future efforts for statehood for the Palestinians must learn from this catastrophe.
As always, I welcome your input, critiques and rebuttal.
What did I get wrong?