Medier flest dekker en viktig egenskap ved norgespris svakt: De skriver at høyere strømpriser fører til større utgifter for staten. Det stemmer. Men de unnlater å skrive at høyere strømpriser også fører til større inntekter for staten, og at inntektene øker mer enn utgiftene. Dette fordi staten eier og/eller driver har skattlegging av kraftverk.
Men noe så svakt som denne i Nationen har jeg ikke sett, tror jeg. Denne journalisten tror åpenbart at staten faktisk blir fattigere når strømprisen stiger. Slik kan det gå når en stakkars journalist stoler på mediene. 1/
Selv om #Norgespris koster, får staten fortsatt et gigantisk overskudd på strøm.
Rik stat, fattig befolkning.
Partiene som er imot Norgespris vil at vi skal bli enda fattigere. Husk det.
Counterintuitively, the situation turns out to be equally bad or even worse there: all taxes included, billionaires pay only 15%-20% of their income in taxes.
And because the rest of the population pays a lot of tax, the gap between the effective tax rate of the middle class and that of billionaires is particularly large in Sweden and Norway.
Elon Musk is prorably the most important tech person and entrepreneur in the world for our country. By shutting down Russia’s illegal use of Starlink on Ukrainian territory, @elonmusk and @SpaceX protected our air defense, saved our air force, and spared thousands of civilian lives. This is an invaluable contribution to our defense, and every Ukrainian is deeply grateful to him for it.
Catch the full story in my interview with @CBSNews.
‼️ IMPORTANT NOTE: While the Fauci texts are critical, we must remember that miscarriages are not uncommon & we cannot automatically label every tragic pregnancy loss as vax related.
Many likely were, and the precise hypothesis Fauci raised, 2nd dose vax during 1st trimester-has NOT been studied with enough direct, high-powered published clinical evidence to say that a small or moderate increase in miscarriage risk has been definitively excluded.
In other words, while pregnancies were certainly lost from the severe inflammation, the clinical studies weren’t designed to show that OR to exclude it. Therefore, it’s inaccurate to say that it’s “totally safe” and it’s always been that way.
So the lesson here is that we have a DUTY to be truthful about the risks, even the potential major risks that we haven’t excluded, especially when dealing with a treatment intended for pregnant women, and we must NEVER mandate such treatments.
It seems many of our leaders didn’t take medical ethics or perhaps forgot what they learned.
Dette forklarer den uvitenskapelige koronaresponsen – en politikk som i større grad handlet om å beskytte de ansvarlige enn å drive folkehelsearbeid basert på forskning og oppdatert kunnskap. Anthony Fauci og hans krets staket ut kursen, og de fleste fulgte etter (med Sverige som et vellykket unntak).
Penger fra amerikanske helsemyndigheter, ledet av Anthony Fauci, ble sendt til Wuhan-laboratoriet siden 2014 for å samle og genmodifisere virus. Målet var å undersøke potensialet for fremtidige pandemier. #Virusforskning#Pandemi#Wuhan
I largely agree with your non-black-and-white take, but there’s a real danger Fauci actually is a supervillain. If the COVID response was shaped by him trying to hide his responsibility and involvement in the pandemic’s origins through his support of the Wuhan lab, then yes — he’s a supervillain.