Mamdani doesn't speak for America. President Trump does.
Today I led a letter calling on the DOJ to investigate whether Mamdani’s Administration violated the Logan Act by engaging in unauthorized communications with the Islamic Republic of Iran.
If I were the Republican Party, I would do a query for every address where 6+ voters are registered.
Then, I would go through that list to look for how many of those addresses are P.O. Boxes, vacant lots, malls, businesses, churches, shelters, or other non-residential locations.
Then, after locating those non-residential locations, I would see how many of those voters voted & whether they voted by mail.
The next time you hear some Texas establishment politician telling you TxLege is “fiscally conservative”… remind them their budget is so liberal that James Talarico supported it.
Case closed! Tyler Robinson was the lone shooter. The evidence is overwhelming. Move along!
Why do so many social media influencers want this case closed? They claim the evidence presented during the preliminary hearing was “crystal clear,” “damning,” and “conclusive.”
They are either seeing what they want to see, or they are lying.
I’ve been thoroughly investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination since the day it happened. This is the first time I’ve said anything publicly about the case. I couldn’t care less about being the first to break a story or about the clicks and cash that come with it. I care about accuracy. My track record speaks for itself.
What’s happening on social media right now is identical to what happened during COVID. Anyone who dared to seek information about the safety and efficacy of an experimental mRNA injection was labeled a science denier and shamed into solitude.
Ask questions about the public assassination of Charlie Kirk and you’re “crazy,” “a grifter,” or “a Candace cult member.”
To conclude that Tyler Robinson acted alone requires setting aside a number of glaring details that, at a minimum, warrant further scrutiny. These are just a few:
THE OTHER GUNMAN
An eyewitness videotaped an individual on the roof of the Losee Center, dressed in all-black tactical gear, including a face mask and helmet. This witness reported seeing what appeared to be a smaller/shorter rifle than the one later associated with the case.
He stated that he observed the individual run across the roof, set up, and take the shot at 12:23 p.m. The weapon he saw appeared to be a smaller rifle than what authorities later highlighted. He noted the sound as a “sharp crack,” not a big hunting rifle boom. The witness reported these details to authorities, but to date no one has followed up.
DISPATCH AUDIO
911 audio was broadcast shortly after the shooting. Dispatch relayed the suspect description to officers: “He’s on top of the building on the far north side, just east of the library… He’s going to be wearing all black, black long gun, black tactical helmet, a black mask, possibly wearing a tactical vest and jeans.”
DESTRUCTION OF THE CRIME SCENE
The lawn where Charlie Kirk was shot was paved over just four days later. The crime scene was excavated and covered with concrete on a Sunday. Dan Merrell was hired to pave the area. When he arrived at the scene, approximately 10 inches of topsoil had already been removed. Merrell stated on camera that someone coordinating the work told him, “The governor and the FBI said they want this done by Monday.”
DNA DISCREPANCIES
Forensic testimony indicated that DNA recovered from the towel wrapped around the rifle belonged to two individuals. One profile was identified as Robinson’s roommate, Lance Twiggs, while Robinson was identified only as a possible contributor to DNA found on the towel and on a screwdriver recovered from the rooftop. ATF forensic biologist Kaitlyn Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA sample was “the most degraded.” What this could mean is that Lance Twiggs was the last to touch the rifle.
INCONCLUSIVE FRAGMENTS
During the preliminary hearing, ATF examiner Samantha Karner testified about a bullet jacket fragment pulled from Kirk’s autopsy compared against test-fires from the Mauser bolt-action rifle. Her analysis concluded the fragment “could not be identified or excluded” as having been fired from the rifle, with the report stating “the result of the comparison was inconclusive.” She testified she was “unable to say one way or another” due to a lack of microscopic marks on the bullet jacket fragment.
THE UNFIRED BULLET
During cross-examination, the defense asked investigator David Hull about a bullet found on a rooftop other than the rooftop where Robinson is alleged to have fired the fatal shot. Hull said he “believed” there was an unfired bullet found on another building, not the Losee Center. He said the area wasn’t treated as part of the crime scene because the bullet “was accounted for as an ejected cartridge from an officer who had cycled his rifle.” When pressed on specifics, Hull said he could not identify the building, could not recall the type of round, didn’t know when it was found, and didn’t know where it currently was.
ENHANCED SURVEILLANCE VIDEO
Judge Graf agreed to play an “enhanced” UVU surveillance video showing the person alleged to be Robinson on the rooftop—but ruled it would be shown only to people physically present in the courtroom.
As if following a script, conservative influencers who were in the courtroom that day echoed the same talking points. They claimed that the footage was clear, high-definition proof showing Robinson taking the shot—framing it as “undeniable.” However, others who were in the courtroom strongly refute these claims.
Brandi Siciliani posted on X “I was in the courtroom today. There is no high-quality, zoomed-in footage showing anyone taking a shot. The video shown is the same distance as the footage of ‘Tyler’ jumping off the roof… I have no idea why people are claiming otherwise. They know the video isn’t going to be released publicly, so they’re misrepresenting what was actually shown in court.”
As a filmmaker, I know a thing or two about video technology. 4K resolution alone doesn’t overcome the physics of distance and digital zoom. 4K refers to the sensor/output resolution (roughly 3840×2160 pixels), not how much detail exists on a subject 100+ yards away. If the subject occupies a tiny fraction of the frame, you only have a small number of actual pixels covering that person. Zooming in digitally (enlarging in post-production) doesn’t add resolution—it just makes the existing pixels bigger. It can improve visibility of shapes and colors, but it doesn’t recover facial detail or other identifying features that weren’t resolved at capture.
Not even AI can be trusted to upscale pixelated video. Enhancing a blurry face with AI can produce a coherent, convincing face that doesn’t match the actual person—because the model is filling gaps with statistically likely features, not real ones.
And… exhale.
These are just a few of the outstanding details that, in my opinion, should warrant deeper investigation into the murder of Charlie Kirk.
What you’re witnessing is a psychological operation cunningly deployed to further divide us and stop us from asking questions.
Beware of anyone pushing to close this case prematurely. We must never allow politics to thwart the pursuit of truth and justice.
This case holds the power to kill critical thinking or pull back the curtain to reveal the inner workings of “fifth generation warfare.” Which way it goes is entirely up to us, the people.
“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”
Mikki Willis
Investigative Filmmaker
I called this guy, said I had a candidate. He said Americans are OK, but H1Bs are preferred.
Did not disclose end client, but said "implementation partner" is Xebia.
His phone is:
513 855 0055
He is listed in phone directory as Pradeep G., so search by first name if you call.
Coast Guard rescue swimmer Scott Ruskan saved 165 lives during the catastrophic floods at Camp Mystic. This past year, he was awarded the Legion of Merit by President Donald J. Trump and has now received the 2026 ESPY Pat Tillman Award for Service.
A true American hero.❤️
Voting data reveals Muslims came out to vote in very high percentages near mosques and got their mayor candidate elected in Frisco, Texas
We were warned mosques would be used to mobilize voters and take over our elected positions, that’s EXACTLY what happened in Frisco
“We had an election in Fresco, which is a Texas town. It's one of our big Texas towns. And what we saw happen was that the candidate that many of the Christians were pushing for did not get elected.
And what we found through looking at the numbers was that the candidate that did win won because a majority of the Muslim-Hindu precincts, a high percentage of of folks voted in those precincts. In fact, 2 of the polling locations by mosques had the highest turnout of voters”
It was exposed by RAIR that foreign money has been flowing into states like Texas for mosques to turn them into voter mobilization centers to take over our elected positions
None of this is organic. It’s all being well funded and orchestrated. This is the Islamic takeover of America
Greg Abbott’s silence on Texas’s Muslim takeover has a price tag.
His top donor, Pakistani Syed Javaid Anwar, has given:
$1.6M (2019-2020)
$5.6M (2020)
$6.1M (2024)
$2.9M (current cycle)
Foreign money is buying America’s future.
🇺🇳🇮🇱 The UN has officially declared Gaza a genocide zone, noting that Israel is deliberately targeting children and infants.
It took them three full years to reach this conclusion.
Lebanon. Gaza. The West Bank.
We cannot allow American taxpayer dollars to continue to fund the killing of children and civilians abroad. The violence must stop.
Props to our @Unitedcajunnavy TX Chapter who rescued these horses struggling to find their way out of dangerous flood waters. Thankfully our 4-legged 🐎 friends were brought to safety, checked out by a veterinarian, and returned to their owners! 🫡💪🙏 https://t.co/wwNr3PNHbm