Brad Lee Barnhill | #YourIndependentVoice for Nevada Secretary of State. Secure elections everyone trusts, easier business filings, strong consumer protections.
Nevada elections are only months away, and trust in the system is on the line.
Voter rolls are the foundation of every fair election — yet the current Secretary of State's office has been silent on their true state.
We deserve transparency and secure elections. Period. The problem?
Inaccurate voter rolls erode confidence.
Dead voters still listed. People moved out years ago. Inactive registrations piling up.
When the incumbment Democrat in office won't talk about it and won't aggressively maintain the lists, lawful votes get diluted and public trust collapses. This isn't acceptable in 2026.
I am #YourIndependentVoice — Independent American candidate for Nevada Secretary of State with 35 years of systems analysis experience and another 20 years of paralegal experience.
I solve problems for a living.
I'm done talking. If Cisco Aguilar won't do his legal duty, i'll personally hold him accountable in federal court and clear the rolls to protect every lawful vote.
Is your candidate for Nevada Secretary of State prepared to work this hard to protect your vote?
The Secretary of State's silence on the state of our voter rolls is unacceptable. As a citizen, you deserve to know that your vote counts and that our elections are secure.
I have spent 35 years in my career as a systems analyst and another 20 years as a paralegal solving complex problems. I solve problems for a living
I refuse to let government inaction jeopardize our democratic process.
If the Democrat Secretary of State won't uphold his legal duty to maintain accurate lists, I will hold him accountable in federal court.
It is time to restore trust in our system. We must clear the rolls to protect every lawful vote.
I am #YourIndependentVoice for Nevada Secretary of State. No other candidate will fight this hard to protect your vote.
@SpencerDevino@BasedMikeLee@Supportarg10161 I disagree. This provision will make it possible for people like me who have forsworn the Mark of the Beast foretold to establish natural born citizenship by natural born citizen parents and acquire VoterID.
Senate Shenanigans: Why the SAVE Act is Stuck in Traffic (And How a Filibuster Might Tire Everyone Out)
Speaking about debating the SAVE Act – that bill aiming to lock down voter eligibility with proof of citizenship. It's passed the House, but in the Senate? It's like trying to get through a buffet line at a senior center: slow, crowded, and full of unexpected holdups. No finger-pointing here; just a fun look at the players and why things are dragging. Buckle up for some light-hearted Capitol comedy!
First up, the "Zombie Filibuster" himself: Mitch McConnell. Picture this – an undead procedural ghost that just won't quit, shuffling along without breaking a sweat, blocking paths like a pro. He's the eternal holdout, keeping things in limbo with that classic Kentucky cool. But hey, zombies gotta rest sometime, right?
Then there's John "Puppy Parade" Thune, the Senate's top dog. While the SAVE Act waits in line, he's out championing... a Senate doggie parade? Complete with costumes, treats, and Mardi Gras vibes for our furry friends. Adorable? Absolutely. But voters are barking: "Hey John, fetch us some election security first!" If only we could train senators like pups – sit, stay, vote!
Don't forget Thom "Paw-ty Planner" Tillis, co-sponsoring the bill but hitting pause on the push. He's the guy who helped organize that canine carnival – think senators in bowties with their best buds. Fun fact: More energy for tail-wags than talking filibusters? We get it, who doesn't love a good pup parade, but let's not let it eclipse the main event.
Shoutout to Lisa "Arctic Anchor" Murkowski, holding steady like an iceberg in Alaska waters, and Susan "Maine Maverick" Collins, charting her own course through the fog. These folks add flavor to the mix, reminding us Senate life's a team sport – sometimes with detours.
Now, the million-dollar question: If Republicans forced a standing filibuster (you know, the old-school talk-till-you-drop kind), how long could Democrats hold the floor? With many senators in their golden years – think Chuck Schumer at 75, Dick Durbin nearing 81 – endurance might be the real wildcard. A few hours of nonstop yapping? Sure. Days? Picture bathroom breaks, coffee runs, and maybe a nap or two. Rotations could stretch it to a week, but fatigue hits hard after 70. It'd be like a verbal marathon for folks who'd rather be at bingo. Could Republicans outlast 'em? That's the hilarious hypothetical – pass the popcorn!
Bottom line: The SAVE Act's about making sure every vote counts fair and square. Whether you're Team Red, Blue, or Independent, who doesn't want secure elections? Drop your thoughts below – should we push for that filibuster fitness test? Or is a dog parade the real priority? #SAVEAct #SenateFun #VoterVibes
As the Independent American Party candidate for Nevada Secretary of State, I just delivered a formal Demand / Pre-Suit Notice to Secretary Cisco Aguilar and his office. After I submitted a detailed analysis showing ~12,466 apparent duplicate voter registrations in Clark County — complete with matching names, birth years, conflicting addresses, and dual 2024 General Election voting records — the Secretary of State closed the complaint without any investigation. My data came straight from the state’s own public voter file.
This response is unacceptable. Instead of addressing systemic list maintenance failures as required by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), they dismissed my expert findings as “third-party data” and redirected everything to individual county-level challenges that demand personal knowledge and perjury oaths. The chief elections officer is evading his statewide responsibility. Nevada law and federal NVRA obligations both demand reasonable efforts to keep voter rolls accurate — not deflection.
I will not let this slide. This letter puts the Secretary on notice of my intent to file suit in federal court under the NVRA’s private right of action unless they immediately investigate and reconcile these duplicates. Election integrity demands clean rolls. The public deserves transparency, not excuses.
I am #YourIndependentVoice for Nevada Secretary of State.
Will your candidate work this hard to protect your vote?
The Nevada Secretary of State has responded to my database anomaly complaint with a dismissal, stating that I have to file challenges with the County Clerk and only within my voting precinct.
Cisco fails to understand that he has a mandatory duty to the People of Nevada under the National Voter Registration Act to make reasonable efforts to maintain accurate voter lists by removing ineligible voters (including those who have moved) and keeping records current.
My original complaint and database analysis establishes that there are problems in the database--problems that he must address pursuant to federal law.
Cisco now has constructive knowledge of the anomalies. If he does not perform at least an investigation, he is statutorially liable.
@KelliKayK What you CAN do is screenshot the post, post it to your feed and let folks look her up and block her.
That would be the most effective treatment for objectionable content.
As the Independent American Party candidate for Nevada Secretary of State, I just delivered a formal Demand / Pre-Suit Notice to Secretary Cisco Aguilar and his office. After I submitted a detailed analysis showing ~12,466 apparent duplicate voter registrations in Clark County — complete with matching names, birth years, conflicting addresses, and dual 2024 General Election voting records — the Secretary of State closed the complaint without any investigation. My data came straight from the state’s own public voter file.
This response is unacceptable. Instead of addressing systemic list maintenance failures as required by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), they dismissed my expert findings as “third-party data” and redirected everything to individual county-level challenges that demand personal knowledge and perjury oaths. The chief elections officer is evading his statewide responsibility. Nevada law and federal NVRA obligations both demand reasonable efforts to keep voter rolls accurate — not deflection.
I will not let this slide. This letter puts the Secretary on notice of my intent to file suit in federal court under the NVRA’s private right of action unless they immediately investigate and reconcile these duplicates. Election integrity demands clean rolls. The public deserves transparency, not excuses.
I am #YourIndependentVoice for Nevada Secretary of State.
Will your candidate work this hard to protect your vote?
The Nevada Secretary of State has responded to my database anomaly complaint with a dismissal, stating that I have to file challenges with the County Clerk and only within my voting precinct.
Cisco fails to understand that he has a mandatory duty to the People of Nevada under the National Voter Registration Act to make reasonable efforts to maintain accurate voter lists by removing ineligible voters (including those who have moved) and keeping records current.
My original complaint and database analysis establishes that there are problems in the database--problems that he must address pursuant to federal law.
Cisco now has constructive knowledge of the anomalies. If he does not perform at least an investigation, he is statutorially liable.
The Nevada Secretary of State has responded to my database anomaly complaint with a dismissal, stating that I have to file challenges with the County Clerk and only within my voting precinct.
Cisco fails to understand that he has a mandatory duty to the People of Nevada under the National Voter Registration Act to make reasonable efforts to maintain accurate voter lists by removing ineligible voters (including those who have moved) and keeping records current.
My original complaint and database analysis establishes that there are problems in the database--problems that he must address pursuant to federal law.
Cisco now has constructive knowledge of the anomalies. If he does not perform at least an investigation, he is statutorially liable.
Public Information Officer Nevada Secretary of State
1 State of Nevada Way
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Nevada Public Records Act Request – High-Level Information on August 2025 Statewide Cyber Incident Impact on Secretary of State Systems and Associated Costs
Dear Public Information Officer,
Pursuant to the Nevada Public Records Act (NRS Chapter 239), I respectfully request an opportunity to inspect or obtain copies of the following public records:
1. Any final, high-level summary reports, statements, or communications issued by the Secretary of State’s office that confirm whether Secretary of State systems (including but not limited to election-related systems such as VREMS) were compromised, breached, or disrupted as a result of the statewide cyber incident that began on or around August 24, 2025. Please limit this to non-technical, high-level confirmations or denials of impact only.
2. Any publicly disclosable records showing the total costs incurred by the Secretary of State’s office specifically in responding to the August 2025 cyber incident. This may include, but is not limited to, aggregate figures for overtime hours, vendor or contractor payments, or other direct response-related expenditures (excluding any detailed security plans, vulnerabilities, or investigative materials).
I am not requesting any information related to system vulnerabilities, security protocols, ongoing investigations, personal identifying information, or any records that are exempt under NRS 293.870 or other provisions.
If any portion of this request is denied, please provide a written explanation citing the specific legal basis for the denial and provide any segregable, non-exempt portions of the records.
I prefer to receive responsive records in electronic format (e.g., PDF via email) to minimize costs. If there are any fees associated with this request, please notify me in advance of the estimated amount. I am willing to pay reasonable fees up to $50; please contact me if the costs are expected to exceed this amount.
Thank you for your assistance with this request. I look forward to your response within the statutory timeframe.
Sincerely,
It is NOT lack of voter ID
It is NOT illegal aliens showing up at the polls.
It is NOT goofy machines screwing with the vote.
ELECTIONS ARE STOLEN WITH MAIL-IN BALLOTS TO - ELIGIBLE - VOTERS - AT INELIGIBLE ADDRESSES - COLLECTED BY NGOS AND VOTED AFTER THE ELECTION FOR THEIR CANDIDATE.
https://t.co/Kg9DfpiVul
Brazil (~212M population): Fully electronic voting since 2000. Results for national elections (e.g., president) are tallied centrally and often announced within hours—sometimes 75 minutes to a few hours after polls close. In 2022, near-complete results (99%+) were available on election night.
India (~1.47B population): Uses Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) with VVPAT. For national or major state elections, counting starts early on counting day; tallies for hundreds of millions of votes are often largely complete within hours to a day, with trends clear quickly.
Indonesia (~288M population): Votes counted publicly at polling stations right after closing (often by afternoon/evening). Quick counts and official recapitulation provide substantial results the same night or next day, though full aggregation can take longer for all levels.
Mexico (~130M+ population): Quick counts (statistical samples) and PREP system deliver preliminary presidential results on election night (often by late evening). Full counts follow soon after.
Pakistan (~260M population), Nigeria (~242M), Bangladesh (~177M), and Russia (~144M): Often report significant preliminary results the same night or next day via polling-station counting and transmission. Speeds vary by election and can face delays, but same-night trends are common.
Smaller but still qualifying examples (around or above 40M):
Many European countries like France, Germany, and the UK (populations 60–80M+) routinely have near-complete results by late election night or early morning, often with manual counting of simpler ballots.
@NevadaNewsViews Only US Citizens and lawful resident aliens should be counted in the census. Children of birth tourist should not be citizens for the same reason.
https://t.co/x6rPtj4wFB
38% of Nevada voters are Non-Partisan, IAP, or Libertarian.
More than Democrats.
More than Republicans.
We are the plurality.
Every future election in Nevada will be decided by Independents.