All eyes are fixated on El Niño. But the polar circulation is showing signs of a major disruption, with historically early weakening.
Full breakdown (and more) in today's article: https://t.co/xBinUWVBf3
Polar bear numbers have risen dramatically over the past 60 years.
Bears once rarely seen are now regularly approaching settlements. One Nunavut elder recalled seeing none as a child, but as many as 40 a year today.
The Canadian government now warns bear numbers have exceeded what communities can safely live alongside, and its own plan allows populations to be reduced.
In June 2026, officers shot and killed a large bear near Iqaluit. At Grise Fiord, another bear returned six times in four days, and a local hunter eventually had to shoot it. In 2024, two bears killed a worker on Brevoort Island. That same year, another chased a man into his home in Kuujjuaq before moving toward a crowd and being killed.
Across the Arctic, roughly 70 bears a year were shot in defense of life or property between 2020 and 2025.
The bedtime story is that polar bears are disappearing because of climate change. In reality, though, authorities and residents are having to shoot them because there are too many.
The Climatariat's dismissal of fusion as a 'false solution' echoes its rejection of nuclear power—and should tell you that affordable, abundant energy is not the goal here.
Full breakdown (and more) in today's article: https://t.co/CFALftJXxK
Researchers drilled bedrock cores near Thwaites Glacier in West Antarctica.
Today, those sites sit under about 35 to 40 meters of ice. But during the earlier Holocene--the current warm period that began about 11,700 years ago-- the ice was only 2 to 7 meters thick.
For thousands of years, it held at these low levels before thickening again. The paper calls this "reversible ice sheet thinning." The region thinned before, naturally, then recovered.
The physical record is littered with examples of great thinning and thickening.
This is not unprecedented. Nor is it irreversible.
The findings could reveal previously unrecognized patterns of internal heating, perhaps even changes in heat output and connections to recent surface warming.
Full report (and more) in today's article: https://t.co/LWtgfyJsYP
Less cloud means more sunlight reaches Earth's surface - that is basic radiation physics. Clouds block incoming solar energy. Fewer clouds mean more shortwave radiation at the ground.
Copernicus data show European sunshine duration has increased over the past four decades.
Since 2006, every year, excluding 2010, has been sunnier than the 1991 to 2020 average.
Reduced cloud cover is the reason.
Official data from Germany show rising sunshine duration since 1951, with temperatures rising lockstep. The hottest German year on record, 2003, also happens to be the sunniest in the series.
Less cloud, more sunshine, more solar energy reaching the surface raises temperatures.
Urban surfaces and poor station siting can push readings higher again.
Cloud loss and urbanization are driving global warming. The question is by how much?
If the Sun's unusually weak polar fields fail to recover before solar minimum, the implications for Cycle 26 could be profound.
Full breakdown in today's article: https://t.co/xQeE3yc8Y1
Private organizations, accountable to neither the electorate nor the communities affected, can wield extraordinary influence over public policy and decision-making.
Full breakdown (and much more) in today's article: https://t.co/ZRA6Mnjh7U
Solar panels are sold with a 25-year lifespan.
By 2050 the International Renewable Energy Agency projects 78 million tons of solar panel waste.
Only about 10% of panels are currently recycled, with much of the rest facing landfill.
Moreover, that 25-year pitch assumes the panel survives reality. No strong wind gusts. No major hailstorms. No early replacement. No heat-driven degradation.
Solar panels are glass, metals, polymers, wiring, and chemical layers. Those components do not vanish when the subsidies ends.
Net Zero sells the installation.
The disposal bill comes later.
Europe pays through the nose for its "transition." China supplies the materials. And Beijing gains another lever over the continent. Energy independence?
Full breakdown (and more) in today's article: https://t.co/2QxosJROdd
In New York's picturesque Adirondacks, forest is being cleared for solar panels.
Land the public was promised was "forever wild" is now being sold off to industrial renewable projects.
Thousands of trees removed.
Acres upon acres of habitat destroyed.
Landscapes scarred.
All to install glass, steel, fencing and access roads.
The permits come from the state bureaucracy.
The subsidies come from taxpayers.
The profits go to developers.
Destroying nature in the name of saving it is not environmentalism, it is quite the opposite. But money talks.
By 2050, the world is forecast to face 43 million tons of decommissioned wind turbine blades.
These blades are built from high-strength composites made to survive years of weathering. Still, every single turbine standing today will age-out before 2050.
Most are difficult to recycle, so most are likely to be buried. But Europe now has a landfill ban for blades coming into force.
Nations like Germany, Finland and the Netherlands are already blocking landfills, but they still have blades to dispose of, so the waste is pushed elsewhere.
Blades are exported to countries where burial is still allowed, such as the UK.
Net Zero creates a mountain of composite waste, and then has the audacity to call itself "green."
A large tree trunk has been uncovered beneath a glacier in the Alps, dated to around 6,000 years ago.
The species is Swiss stone pine.
Today, trees of that type cannot grow at that altitude because it is far too cold.
This means that when that tree was alive, the climate there had to be warmer than today.
6,000 years ago aligns with the Holocene climate optimum, a time when temperatures were far higher than now, even with far less atmospheric CO2.
Earth's climate is cyclical and Mother Nature self-regulates.
Narratives of doom serve political aims, not reality.
Western politics remains fixated on domestic CO₂ cuts while China's vast emissions, Asia and Africa's plastic pollution, and the toxic mining practices supplying the wind and solar industries escape anything like the same political pressure.
Full breakdown (and more) in today's article: https://t.co/ZSbXDuuVmW
Shell's biofuels flagship just hit reality.
In Rotterdam, Shell was building what was meant to be Europe's largest biofuel plant at a cost of €1.2 billion.
The annual output target was 820,000 tons of so-called "sustainable" aviation fuel and "renewable" diesel. The feedstock was supposed to be used frying oil, vegetable oils and animal waste.
The sales pitch was "clean aviation."
Then... construction costs soared and demand stayed weak. So Shell paused the project. Then killed it.
3,000 piles went into the ground, millions of work hours spent, hundreds of millions of euros already sunk.
Now the unfinished plant is up for sale, set to either be dismantled, shipped abroad or sold for parts.
That is the biofuels fairy tale.
Three Mile Island is being brought back for the AI boom. More precisely, Unit 1 is planned for a restart, not the damaged Unit 2 from 1979.
Constellation has signed a 20-year power deal with Microsoft to restart Unit 1, now branded the Crane Clean Energy Center.
AI data centers need constant power, not weather-dependent spikes and troughs -- constant power every second. So where are they looking? Nuclear, natural gas, dispatchable energy -- the sources that actually run when needed, not just when the sun shines or when the wind cooperates.
Wind and solar can add some supply, but they do not carry baseload demand. AI is exposing this truth. When power really matters, nobody bets on the weather.
This is a choice. Replace weather-dependent generation with gas, nuclear and/or coal capacity, and the unreliability vanishes.
Full report (and much more) in today's article: https://t.co/SUG9cBNFce
Greenland's ice loss is decelerating.
NASA's GRACE satellites track the full ice sheet: snow, melt, runoff, and ice discharge into the ocean.
That full record exposes the climate alarmist script.
It doesn't show accelerating loss, as claimed, rather it shows decelerating loss. And if the trend continues, recovery comes next.
There is no runaway collapse, no tipping point deadline. Activists warn Greenland is melting into oblivion, but the satellite data say the opposite.