@sojournxrr@LASHYBILLS Just curious in ur statement that shows it’s the boomers job to stop trespassing of his own accord and how he is right when he has been charged with attempted murder ?
🚨 THE POLYNOMIAL OUTCOME: Why the $45M+ Trump Speech Market cannot resolve "NO" 🚨
The @Polymarket / @UMAprotocol dispute over whether Trump said "Iran" or "Straits" has reached a critical bottleneck.
#Polymarket#UMA#PredictionMarkets
$25,000,000 involved in financial fraud on Polymarket!
We need your attention on this matter.
The game is rigged by UMA Rocks whales, and regular traders got scammed.
Chronology:
First, at the summit, Trump says "Iran", "Strait", and "Nuclear". The market instantly reacts, and YES skyrockets to 99.5%—fully aligned with logic and truth. Period.
Then, something strange happens.
Some bad actors start spreading the idea that this was not a LIVE stream but a pre-recorded video broadcast, thus leading to a resolution of NO.
This is possible, okay, but only after a scrutiny examination of all possible sources of translation, which requires a large amount of work and analytics.
Obviously, not all evidence had been gathered at the point in time before the clarification.
Then, the Polymarket team issues a clarification stating that this was not a LIVE stream, but that is NOT TRUE - no proper examination has been done!
From this moment on, the scam starts spreading, and the market flips to NO, costing 99%.
UMA Rocks provides no self-correction to this situation and only blindly copies the Polymarket team's clarification (which is definitely WRONG)!
Our Answer:
At the moment the Polymarket team issued the clarification, not all evidence had been gathered, making it a completely unprofessional move leading to catastrophic FINANCIAL FRAUD.
Furthermore, UMA Rocks only facilitates the error, not providing any meaningful discussion, and aligns with the Polymarket team's clarification (which is WRONG).
WE ASK FOR AN IMMEDIATE RE-EVALUATION OF THE INCORRECT CLARIFICATION THAT LED TO FRAUD INVOLVING 25,000,000 DOLLARS
@shayne_coplan@Polymarket your oracle just resolved the trump-xi iran/nuclear market NO
trump's exact quote: "we did discuss iran. we don't want them to have a nuclear weapon"
- WH pool note #5, filed 11:55 AM Beijing (Danny Kemp, AFP, on-camera real time)
- TVB Hong Kong yt metadata: was_live, timestamp 11:56:11 AM Beijing
- every major broadcaster ran LIVE chyrons
- kalshi resolved the same market correctly
UMA voted NO because the pavilion was "closed press." brother the broadcast happened. on live tv. it's on youtube right now with was_live attached to it.
and this is not the first time we're doing this:
- ukraine mineral deal: $7M market, resolved YES with no deal signed, one wallet swung it with ~5M UMA
- zelensky suit: $160M+ market, every outlet AND POLYMARKET'S OWN ACCOUNT called it a suit, resolved NO, ~$25M staked by whales to make it happen
- now this: $31M currently, the most active market on your platform, flipped by a low-turnout governance vote
UMA's market cap is smaller than the volume of a single disputed market on your venue. top 10 wallets control >50% of voting power in disputes. ~95% of supply held by large holders. you are running a $9B platform on top of an oracle a handful of retards can rug for eight figures
you already override baseball payouts when umpires fuck up. add a human/AI last resort layer for high volume markets with primary source evidence. it's not philosophically harder than what you're already doing
kalshi is eating your volume every week because of exactly this. traders don't want to gamble on whether a UMA whale woke up short. fix it or watch the centralized competitor win the entire prediction market category
ngmi
I promised that if $BTC hits $74,500,
I will give away $20,000 in BTC to 15 people.
So as promised I will be giving away
$20,000 to 15 person today.
Rules: Like, Retweet, and Comment "BTC" 🔔
Gonna lock comments in 24 hours!