Jacob Doughty reviews a recent case from the #CAFC finding a prior art disclosure of a genus of 900+ salts was insufficient to #anticipate or render #obvious a single salt species. #patentlaw https://t.co/hTlCZ91LbN
Rick Treanor explains that while silence can form the basis of support for a negative limitation, a skilled artisan must understand the specification as inherently disclosing the negative limitation. #CAFC#35USC112#writtendescription https://t.co/IZK6tNVrUo
Jacob Doughty illustrates why third-party submissions should not be ignored (particularly in view of their relative low cost) as part of a strategy for influencing the scope of a competitor’s patents. #PTAB#obviousness#enablement#thirdpartysubmission https://t.co/GuASiSof4Z
Rick Treanor on the Supreme Court's refusal to clarify the unsettled state of the law regarding patent eligibility by denying certiorari in American Axle. #SCOTUS#35USC101#patenteligibility https://t.co/f5GvXcCayS
Beau Burton breaks down why Examiners cannot arbitrarily associate benefits and features in the prior art to arrive at a #motivation to modify. #obviousness#PTAB#USPTO https://t.co/Y1aby2uQd0
Yanhong (Claire) Hu with an interesting #PTAB decision on the definiteness of relative claim terms. #indefiniteness#35USC112#USPTO https://t.co/ttScrCVUEA
Mat Barnet's take on Ex parte Whiteman and why Examiners must must provide supporting evidence instead of mere speculation. #obviousness#USPTO#PTAB https://t.co/q2B9d7TByo
Rick Treanor explains how the Federal Circuit's decision in Modernatx, Inc. v. Arbutus Biopharma Corp. provides an instructive framework for traversing #obviousness rejections based on #overlapping ranges. #CAFC#patentlaw https://t.co/KkNyC11aCs
Beau Burton discusses the #PTAB's recent decision, Ex parte Seppo, and the interplay between #enablement and claims that cover #inoperative embodiments. #patentprosecution https://t.co/EaSI4k12J5
Jacob Doughty summarizes a recent #CAFC decision, LG Elecs. v. Immervision, Inc., which considered whether errant information in a #priorart reference can be relied upon to demonstrate #unpatentability. https://t.co/lGUeaOM3XI
Yanhong (Claire) Hu's take on an interesting case, Ex parte Deporter, which involves the claimed subject matter being a non-preferred embodiment of the prior art (#obvious) but also a direct and specific teaching away (#nonobviousness). #PTAB#USPTO https://t.co/AultLL7zCI
As Mat Barnet illustrates, it is not enough that the applied art might satisfy a claimed property - #inherency requires that the claimed property is necessarily satisfied. #USPTO#PTAB#obviousness https://t.co/AYoIgktgfR
Mamoru Kakuda summarizes a recent #CAFC decision addressing whether a prior art reference is "by another." #35USC102#priorart#inventorship https://t.co/KcAs8hYI9j
Jacob Doughty discusses a recent #CAFC opinion showing the risk of basing a conclusion of non-infringement on seemingly significant clerical errors in a claim when the intended meaning is discernible. #infringement#FTO#claimconstruction https://t.co/PpnE35buYK
#USPTO launches Climate Change Mitigation Pilot Program, which allows #patent applications involving technologies that mitigate #climatechange to be advanced out of turn for examination until a first action on the merits. https://t.co/Z7ZYV7kRHv
In this week's blog, Rick Treanor revisits #obviousness rejections based on laundry lists of interchangeable equivalents. #USPTO#PTAB https://t.co/3QS72lF9Bc
Beau Burton discusses a recent #PTAB decision showing the likelihood of having a reasonable expectation of success diminishes with increased selections and lack of guidance. #USPTO#obviousness#patentprosecution https://t.co/NZN60xpW9K
Mamoru Kakuda comments on the #CAFC's recent decision in Sunoco v. U.S. Venture addressing whether an offer to sell was for experimental or commercial purposes. #onsalebar#35USC102 https://t.co/3kYVdllYH4