Everybody's jumping on the prose, but as a piece of scientific writing, the reasoning level of the essay is extremely bad too.
She writes:
"Women naturally want to do womanly things because God has created us with those womanly desires in our hearts"
A sentence like this is circular and literally means nothing.
Imagine going to Wikipedia to learn about cats only for the cat behavior section to read:
Cats want to do cat things because God has created them with catly desires in their heart.
And the whole essay is like that.
Leaving it up to men to decide that women look better fully clothed means accepting that one day they might decide you look better naked and use the same AI tools they use to dress women up to undress you. Both are rooted in the same desire to control and humiliate women.