The cohort of women like she’s describing is very small. That is
- unmarried
- waiting doing nothing proactive
Many single women are causing their own problems, simply by getting the ick or rejecting wise counsel or having unrealistic standards.
Also does this gray haired woman promote nun-adjacent callings for women? Prayer, works of mercy, lives of service? Or is it just “careers”? Neither wife nor nun, but drone.
These women are gatekeeping their own shame and honor. They bought stock when CAREER was hot. If younger women buy MARRIAGE en masse, the career investor looks utterly shameful. The Poised old woman is trying to protect her honor here by deflecting younger women into buying her stock too
French is all thumbs on his explanation. Evangelicals have less institutional structure than mainlines but that doesn’t “cut [them] loose” anything quite like he describes. Evangelicals see institutions as inhibitive of “just doing things” like reforming the church. It doesn’t mean that they value corporate holiness less, simply by virtue of having fewer or weaker institutions, which is what he is saying they do. It’s just that they see inherent weaknesses in overmuch layering of authority and consultants. French doesn’t, one can infer.
They don’t have “indifferent relationships” to policy, but rather a poltergeist rather than a skeletal (to channel David Bentley hart’s new criterion article) approach to developing church policy.
I know these guys need to eat. Well, French does. But they have published enough fake outrage at right-of-center norms. It has to grow old writing pick-me articles for church ladies and for safe men who, spiritually, are also church ladies.
@douglassmackey Pence is the equivalent of those ppl who seriously tell cops to “shoot them in the knee” instead of using lethal force. It sounds nice, does nothing but exacerbates the problem being addressed
@Katy_Faust Variations on a vibe
1800s “the dark race is uniquely suited for 12-hr field work days
1900s “the kids are resilient”
2000s “the kids appreciate that we especially chose them ro be ours”
You cannot reason from their rules. Their rules are not for your benefit. If you benefit, they will change the rules.
Patriots have to rip out their language and their reasoning, and install what is just by their own lights. You can’t put your new wine into their old wineskins
What if I start a new religion in Britain? Call it Americanity?
Can I demand my religious freedoms will be protected in Britain?
Specifically I want to carry a 9mm and say whatever I want without being arrested?
@ChHouseBooks Reading level matters too.
The White Company by Arthur Conan Doyle is proving too much for my kids.
The Trapp Family Singers and Little Women were just right. They wanted more.
The Hardy Boys or Tintin as a family read-aloud are too low. They’re great for private reading tho.
@GraduatedBen@timburchett The classic Anglo behavior is to say “you can just do things” and then not do things
The classic barbarian behavior is to lack verbal acumen to say “you can just do things” and then they just do things.
(This post is not about the spanking discourse, but could be. Sides align)
@Keir_Starmer Anyone just following legal procedure or hiding their moral agency behind a wall of dysfunctional “norms” is
1. Blockading justice for neighbors
2. “Just following orders”
3. Killing themselves on the inside
4. Interfering with real leadership who would right these wrongs
@GuruAnaerobic Just read this to the fam at breakfast. Now they want to do exactly this. “Did he make that up? 😂 That’s my new motto. Be like butterfly”
@FischerKing64@HonorAndDaring Immigration numbers, unpopular wars, seeing small government as a LARP, interstate highway exit consumer culture, knowing the state lies to the ppl, flyovers getting rug-pulled by data center carpetbagger developers in coordination w state politicos
Consider women to come with lotto scratch offs. Women who like their dads come with, let’s say, 1,000 scratch offs automatically.
You can take inventory of your odds with different women
Church: + 300 scratch offs
Lifetime church/pious: + 300
Married parents: + 1000
Those traits + Attractive: (x4)
High social media use -800
Frivolous -300
Overserious -200
Wants career: -1500
Those traits + Attractive: (/4 (divided by 4)
The arguments against this strategy:
1.) Waiting till your 30s to start a family is sub-optimal for both sides.
2.) Like it or not "high mileage" women are still considered sub optimal.
3.) "Dating up aggressively" makes them sound like whores. Date for optimal match.