The context of the two letters and my reaction to each say it all. Nothing changed in me. Those were and still are my standards. https://t.co/TF54xMijju
@emmanuel42876 Wait. So what was unacceptable and questionable to you back in 2013 is now something you defend in 2017? @AsecMargauxUson https://t.co/gIPuO3xtZ1
It's fine, thank you. Even the "most" is subjective here but I won't pursue this topic anymore. Not really worth our time. Again, thank you. https://t.co/pqOnSZpl3g
I do but I don't judge an agency or a person's competence on a single letter. I believe in constructive criticisms resulting to improvement. https://t.co/8eAfEJBHI8
That many? For someone whose main job is communicating?
It's OK. We've established your standards way lower than mine. You can let go now. https://t.co/2MOSffRdUg
Dunno about you, but someone drawing that huge a salary expected to at least PROOFREAD what he signs, yes?
If not, we have a problem. https://t.co/xMKCeLlV1H
That Asec has a six digit salary from our taxes and he can't be bothered proofreading his own office's releases before signing it. https://t.co/xMKCeLlV1H
That letter from a COMMUNICATIONS office encapsulates incompetence. If you can't demand proper grammar & coherence from PCOO, who else pa? https://t.co/d4KLhAJJO3
@emmanuel42876@mrsunlawyer Not being able 2 detect or identify mistakes/errors IS incompetence. Esp if u are expected 2 be an expert on d matter (grammar)
Nope. I was clear. No innuendos nor undertones.
Am beginning to wonder if you're from the PCOO, too. Other people here asking as well. https://t.co/ogaNcpuuTx
@wawam@emmanuel42876 Yup. Even in law school we were drilled in being coherent, precise, grammatically correct. The late Justice Escolin made us spell properly.