Grok Build has three commands for managing memory across sessions: /memory, /flush, and /dream. They're experimental but worth looking at if you've ever been frustrated with how agents forget everything between conversations.
/memory opens a window into what Grok has saved. There are three layers: global memory, workspace-specific memory, and per-session summaries. You can read what's there, edit it, or delete things you don't want kept.
/flush is for when you've had a useful session and want it saved before context compaction kicks in. It writes a summary of the current conversation into the memory store, capturing decisions, debugging paths, project conventions, and anything else worth keeping.
/dream runs in the background over your old session logs and memory fragments. It deduplicates overlapping notes, merges related fragments, and consolidates everything into cleaner topics, so the store doesn't grow into a pile of half redundant snippets over time.
Most agent memory I've looked at just shoves the chat history into RAG. That works for about a week before the store gets noisy and starts hurting sessions. Grok Build treats capture and consolidation as separate commands, with the user able to inspect what's saved.
The editable part is important. If your agent saves something wrong, or if your conventions change, you need to be able to go find that memory and remove it. Otherwise the agent keeps applying outdated context with full confidence and you spend cycles undoing its mistakes.
Managing context for long-running agents is going to need real memory primitives. Write, search, prune, and consolidate, all as first class operations. Grok shipping these three commands is the first time I've seen a consumer product treat memory as its own layer.
Constructing is far nobler than deconstructing.
To the extent that the West is faltering, it is only becuase takers have gained more power than makers
Building is moral.
Back to building.
Never fall into the poisoned mental frame of those who cannot want and imagine a positive future, and therefore have no willpower to build it.
One of the reasons the elites ignore the Muslim grooming gangs is they simply can’t handle the levels of horror these attacks reach. Such as…
-nailing a girl’s tongue to a block of wood while she’s raped.
-having them dig their own graves.
-drenching them in gasoline.
-branding girl’s asses with an M for Mohammad.
-raping girls under the Pakistani flag.
The list goes on. It’s much easier just to assume we’re lying and the problem isn’t real.
Starlink Internet access enables people to learn anything and access the global market for their goods & services, improving their standard of living
for decades, western institutions did a fairly good job of conveying truth and advancing the values that had built this civilization
which is why so many people still blindly trust them
they have abused that trust
a great example is how little they cover massively important things (like grooming gangs) - it could best be described as suppression
any institution that purports to be truth seeking but is in fact not truth seeking, will eventually crumble or be replaced by something that is more truth seeking
The goal of the 𝕏 algorithm is simple: show each user the content they are most likely to find interesting, limited only by the laws within a given jurisdiction. No thumb on the scale.
Doesn’t mean we achieve the goal, but that is what I tell the team.