Anthony Woodford

Sign of the times advisor and searcher for truth

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

Ezekiel 26:18

“Now shall the isles tremble in the day of thy fall; yea, the isles that are in the sea shall be troubled at thy departure.”

Ezekiel 39:6

“And I will send fire on Magog and on those who live in security in the coastlands. Then they shall know that I am the Lord.”

Australian Christian % end WWII- ~88-90%

Aus. Christian % 2024- ~44%.

The alliance of Magog= China, Iran, Russia, amongst others against Israel - including Australia’s UN voting.

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

@EYakoby Some of my highlights

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

The other side of Prof Peter Greste’s commentary:

No clear public record of Peter Greste describing these measures as adversely affecting democracy.
Here’s the breakdown based on available statements and activity:
1. Under-16 social media restrictions
Greste has engaged with the topic. He has chaired or participated in public discussions and debates asking “Should social media be banned for under 16s?” and promoted events examining the impact on young people.
He has treated it as a legitimate policy debate rather than framing it as a threat to democracy. There is no prominent statement from him calling the under-16 restrictions themselves a danger to democratic freedoms.
2. Misinformation / disinformation proposals
The 2024 Labor bill that sought to pressure platforms on false content failed in the Senate. Searches show no clear record of Greste publicly attacking that specific bill as an attack on democracy. As a press-freedom advocate he is generally wary of government regulation of speech, but there is no documented strong adverse comment from him tying that failed bill to democratic harm.
3. Draft party platform language on ACMA “to avoid bias”
This remains draft platform text, not law. There is no evidence of Peter Greste commenting on it, let alone describing it as a threat to democracy.

Summary:
Peter Greste is a consistent advocate for media freedom and has personal experience of authoritarian restrictions on journalism. However, on the three specific items you listed, he has not issued clear public statements framing them as measures that adversely affect democracy. On the under-16 social media rules he has mainly facilitated debate rather than led opposition on democratic grounds.

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

The man is honestly the most courageous Muslim I know on social media :

[Maliq @MasterMaliq]

"Islam is a religion of peace"

The peace maker👇

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

You need to try and stop manifesting hate and creating false narratives . You’re on the path of a heart attack responding to your own frothing mind :

Current reported numbers (as of mid-2026)
• Total Palestinian deaths in Gaza: Gaza Health Ministry figures are in the range of 73,000–76,000. Some independent analyses estimate higher totals when including indirect deaths (up to ~100,000+ in certain studies).
• Children: Multiple sources (including UNICEF-linked reporting and demographic analyses) have cited figures in the 21,000–23,000 range for children killed. So the “over 22,000 kids” claim is within the ballpark of some published estimates. The specific addition of “babies” is a smaller subset of that number.
• “120,000 civilians massacred”: This is not supported. Even the higher independent estimates of total deaths do not reach 120,000, and Gaza Health Ministry numbers do not distinguish cleanly between civilians and combatants. Hamas fighters are included in the overall death tallies. Claims of 120,000 civilian deaths significantly exceed available data.
Important context
• Gaza Health Ministry figures are the main source used by media and UN agencies, but they are run by Hamas and do not reliably separate combatants from civilians.
• Israel disputes the figures and states that a substantial portion of those killed were Hamas or Islamic Jihad operatives.
• The war began with Hamas’s 7 October 2023 attack that killed ~1,200 Israelis (mostly civilians) and took hostages.
• Both the scale of destruction in Gaza and the civilian toll are extremely high by any measure. That does not make every specific high-end claim accurate.
Summary:
The child death figure of ~22,000 appears in some reports. The claim of 120,000 civilians killed does not match the available data.

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

I love the irony of inferences that being a Christian is being part of a cult after saying this “You know when you are in a cult when it’s leader needs to moderate debate and try to censor discourse.”

Yet when I try discourse I often get insults or pictures of claims then blocked when I try to engage:

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

Another “slip of the heart” from the same warped soul that debated on the “benefits of child marriage” potentially encompassing toddlers.

Grok- “Daniel Haqiqatjou’s post is rhetorical exaggeration, not accurate analysis.
On the Spain claim
Spain has taken relatively strong diplomatic positions critical of Israel (including recognition of Palestine and public criticism). However:
• Several Muslim-majority countries have formal peace treaties or normalized relations with Israel (Egypt, Jordan, UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and others via the Abraham Accords).
• Many Gulf states maintain extensive economic, security, and diplomatic ties with Israel or the West while offering varying levels of rhetorical support for Palestinians.
• There is no credible evidence that Muslim countries are “cooperating with Israel to destroy Spain” for its stance on Gaza. That is conspiratorial framing, not fact.
Spain’s actions are more vocal than some Muslim governments on this issue, but the “repay them by destroying Spain” claim is false.
On Haqiqatjou’s broader record
Yes, he has repeatedly defended classical Islamic rulings that permit marriage of minors, including arguments that child marriage (tied to puberty or younger in some traditional interpretations) is legitimate and that Western rejection of it is a modern aberration. He has made these arguments in debates and content, which is why critics (including other Muslims) describe his positions as extreme. The “toddlers” framing is a strong polemical characterization of the outer edge of those classical positions he has refused to condemn.”

[Eyal Yakoby @EYakoby]

Did they just accidentally admit that mass migration destroys countries?

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

Courage….

[Maliq @MasterMaliq]

So a prophet of God would say: if someone leaves the religion, kill them?

That those who insult him must be killed?

That non-Muslims should be hated and treated as enemies?

I cannot accept that as the character of a prophet from God.

A true man of God would call people towards truth, compassion and justice, not fear, hatred and bloodshed.

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

Care to cite please what you are quoting?

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

Science versus Islam.

Freedom is releasing your mind from insane conditioning.

Drinking Camel urine-
“This was a desert medicine which contains anti bacterial properties and works.”

[Moon @Moon7zm3]

@MasterMaliq the Hadith never tells the reader to drink camel urine rather the prophet instructed a group of sick people to. This isn’t an obligation for a Muslim to do. If someone wishes to do so then they may. This was a desert medicine which contains anti bacterial properties and works.

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

I think it’s called being able to read in context and only 5 verses below your assertion.

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

Scripture quoted in part is not true.

(Even Satan and his minions have that ability.

Someone who tells me 1st to “f off”then quotes scripture only in part -after accusing me of heresy - fails when they’ve refused to read the rest:

“No, a person is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is circumcision of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the written code. Such a person’s praise is not from other people, but from God.” (Romans 2:29-NIV)

[Liam the Trekky. Tiocfaid ár lá @shootin4love]

@endChristphobia @noplaceforsheep Its nutters like you who abuse the Word that warp Christianity and put people off. ​"For 'the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you,' as it is written." Romans 2:24

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

Curious how Australian Christian voices see this double standard @ACLobby?

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

Amazing display of bias from a prominent self-professed man of science.

Is his intent to mock the beliefs of 11 million Australian’s?

Framed in selective cowardice, ignorance or denial?

The Gospel is simple: Christ died for our sins, was buried, and rose on the third day (1 Cor 15:3-4). Grounded in eyewitnesses, the empty tomb, and apostles who died for that testimony.

You freely mock Christian expression while avoiding equivalent scrutiny of Islam. That selectivity is telling.

Scripture predicted opposition (John 15:18-20). Thanks for the demonstration.

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

Amazing display of bias from a prominent self-professed man of science.

Is his intent to mock the beliefs of 11 million Australian’s?

Framed in selective cowardice, ignorance or denial?

The Gospel is simple: Christ died for our sins, was buried, and rose on the third day (1 Cor 15:3-4). Grounded in eyewitnesses, the empty tomb, and apostles who died for that testimony.

You freely mock Christian expression while avoiding equivalent scrutiny of Islam. That selectivity is telling.

Scripture predicted opposition (John 15:18-20). Thanks for the demonstration.

[Peter FitzSimons @Peter_Fitz]

Can't follow this, Anthony. But saying others are in a cult, when your every other tweet quotes biblical passages as your contributions to debate, and talking of the devil, seems a tad on the odd side.

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

Amazing bragging rights of agreeing not to butcher an atheist apostate

[Ben Shapiro @benshapiro]

"You're lucky we Muslims in here are nice, because if we weren't, our co-religionists outside would burn you to death" isn't an amazing argument

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

The Gospel is simple: all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. Christ died for our sins, was humiliated, tortured and buried, and rose again on the third day — according to the Scriptures (1 Cor 15:3-4). A free gift for you Peter- granting eternal life.

This is grounded in early eyewitness testimony, the empty tomb first discovered by the women disciples and confirmed by Peter, the sudden transformation of the disciples, and the documented willingness of key witnesses to face horrific deaths for that testimony (James son of Zebedee executed by sword — Acts 12; James the brother of Jesus stoned — Josephus; Peter and Paul martyred in Rome under Nero). Repent (turn your back on personal pride and arrogance) and believe in Him, and you will be saved.

That message is not a cult. It is the central claim of Christianity — still affirmed by 43.9% of Australians (2021 Census) and more than 2.4 billion people worldwide.

You treated a general observation about cult leaders who moderate and censor debate as if it required a personal response, then redirected the “cult” label onto biblical quotation and talk of the devil.

In rhetorical terms, jumping in to rebut a description that was never aimed at you is often read as the shoe fitting.

You freely mock Christian expression while applying no equivalent scrutiny to Islam and sometimes defending it. Given the well-documented higher personal and professional risks of criticising Islam, that selectivity can reasonably be read as choosing the safe target.

Religion is a protected attribute in Australia. You are free to disagree with it — the double standard remains telling.

You have 137,000 followers. I have 13. The imbalance does not make the Gospel less true.

Scripture is clear that those who follow Christ will face opposition (John 15:18-20; 2 Tim 3:12). Thanks for providing the observational science to test the truth of this scripture.

If you’re a true man of science, humble your heart, invite Jesus to present himself to you and observe yourself.

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

My only equation to date.

Eternity trusted in liars = 😭😫💔

[Gerard Rennick @RennickGBR]

This would be funny if it wasn’t so tragic

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

@DarrylBain1967 My mistake. It does. Another reason why I won’t be voting Liberal.

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

@DarrylBain1967 So this doesn’t reference what fundraising event this was.

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

@JoycesLovechild No

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

Please give me “all facts to the contrary”

[Euripides Arxidias Tsoutsounas @JoycesLovechild]

@endChristphobia This manufactured martyrdom where somebody echoes your own unsubstantiated and incorrect assumptions despite all facts to the contrary is one of the weakest arguments that the conservative mindset puts forward into the public debate

[Anthony Woodford @endChristphobia]

@JoycesLovechild “Didn’t learn” conflicts with the presupposed existence of a retraction.