SMB Buyers, join me Tuesday morning for a value-packed 60 minutes:
☑️ 5 stages of acquiring a small business and what you need to be prepared for in each stage;
☑️Get the tools and information to know how to write offers that will qualify for SBA financing;
☑️Know the terms and interest rate you can expect based on deal characteristics;
☑️Benefits of getting your loan through Viso vs. on your own or other loan brokers;
☑️Access to special offers from Viso's trusted service provider network
https://t.co/fpt1zpnIBc
This chart from @BarlowResearch has been telling us something important about entrepreneurship in the US.
As the % of business owners >65 ys old continues to incraese every year, it means that younger founders and buyers are entering the market at less than 1:1 to aging owners.
I'm working on a blog post about this now. The ratio has not hit 1:1 or better yet because these businesses are not getting the right kind of advice to prepare for sale. When that happens, we might actually see something closer to the long-promised, but yet unrealized Silver Tsunami.
@dennis_unrein I’m all for getting deals done. Just don’t see the logic in paying a multiple for a salary in a very hard job. I’d pay for a lot of other things, just market those things to me instead.
@ShowMeYourCIM I don't care what you label the number, just please present the information on a seller replacement salary or salaries. Then I will declare that it is not BS!
When the listing doesn't deduct seller replacement salary anywhere or even tell us how many sellers need to be replaced, buyers are starting out guessing. Better info up front = better quality offers. Not saying your listings don't do that, but the vast majority do not include this info.
@ClintFiore yes, I get it, but it's kind of smoke and mirrors math. We could just go straight to EBITDA, and value on a multiple of that. We don't need two different "earnings" numbers that have different price multiples. Just my 2 cents.
It's just not a good valuation metric. If I need a salary to run the biz (sometimes we need more than one replacement salary when multiple sellers are leaving), then why would I pay a multiple of the salary? Just deduct the replacement salaries and call it EBITDA rather than make buyers do separate math.
No, I don't think it's worth Zero. 😆
I simply deduct a "market" salary to replace the seller from SDE. So, maybe that's $100k, and now I value it on $400k EBITDA. That is also how I figure out how much I can borrow on it, the loan amount will be a multiple of EBITDA not SDE because buyer needs wages for food and shelter before they pay the bank.
@Scotcockroft Exactly! We need to put 3 things together to decide if an offer is bankable: 1. Seller/biz financials and info 2. Buyer financials and resume 3. Offer and capital structure. That’s what the Viso Bankability Score does.
Working on a deal and want to know how SBA-bankable your offer will be? How about a Viso Bankability Score to present with your LOI?
Request a Viso Pre-Flight review and find out within 24 hours (no exclusivity required for the first Pre-flight)👇
Interesting SBA to SBA refi scenario:
We have a client doing very well with the biz 3 ys post-close, and are able to get them an interest rate of Prime -1% (6%).
Buyer had wanted out of the PG, but still can't qualify for conventional refi, so is taking the SBA refi w/great rate but adding Personal Gty insurance for a cost of a little over 1%.
Total cost of capital is still being reduced by over 2% from original rate, and the risk to the owner is also cut by 80% with the PG insurance.
Win-win.