MAJOR LEGAL BOMBSHELL: MINNESOTA CHARITY + SOMALI CORRUPTION NETWORK EXPOSED
Today I have filed formal complaints and full evidentiary packages against the American Relief Agency for the Horn of Africa (ARAHA) - a Minnesota-based 501(c)(3) - as well as fresh submissions targeting Somali Disaster Management Agency (SoDMA), former President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, his inner circle, banks, contractors, and linked entities.
ARAHA filings go directly to: IRS, DOJ, FBI, U.S. Treasury, Minnesota Attorney General, and Minnesota Secretary of State.
Evidence includes alleged false reporting, misuse and diversion of charitable donations, foreign expenditure violations, misrepresentations to donors, and possible money laundering involving U.S. taxpayer and donor dollars meant for suffering Somalis.
No more hiding behind nonprofit status. No more ex-presidents treating aid as personal wealth. No more Minnesota charities operating with zero accountability.
I am demanding full audits, forensic financial reviews, asset tracing, sanctions, debarments, and criminal referrals where the evidence leads. Every diverted dollar must be recovered.
The era of “aid for the elites” is finished. Somali people and American donors deserve justice - not excuses.
This is just the beginning.
Share widely. Tag everyone. The spotlight is now on.
#ARAHA #SomaliaAidScandal #HassanSheikhExposed #EndAidCorruption #MinnesotaNonprofit #HoldThemAccountable
US ‘Charity’ in Minnesota and SoDMA Caught Stealing $1,000,000 Aid Meant for Awdal Drought Victims – Donors Defrauded Again
Fellow Somalis and Suffering People of Awdal,
I have completed a full investigation and I am here to expose the disgusting truth: SoDMA and the American fake charity American Relief for the Horn of Africa (ARAHA - Address 2600 E Franklin Avenue, Suite 2, Minneapolis, MN 55406 USA with EIN: 41-1989710) have shamelessly stolen $1,000,000 donated by the Chinese government for drought victims in Awdal.
The fake report they sent to the Chinese Embassy in Mogadishu is complete garbage - full of lies from beginning to end. They claimed the Awdal Governor, Deputy Governor, local administration, elders, village communities, and Somaliland ministries of Health and Water all participated. TOTAL LIES. I personally contacted the elders of every single village listed in their fraudulent report. Every one of them confirmed: NOT A SINGLE FAMILY RECEIVED EVEN ONE KILO OF FOOD. Zero. Nothing. The people got nothing while these criminals got rich.
Here is the dirty truth:
• The $1,000,000 never entered ARAHA’s official accounts in Minnesota, Borama, or Hargeisa.
• The money never left Mogadishu.
• It was divided like loot among the following thieves:
• SoDMA Director Mohamud Moallim
• The Care Taker Minister of Finance Bihi Iman Igeh
• Several greedy Awdal Members of Parliament
• The leadership of ARAHA (US Minnosite and Borama)
• A big chunk funneled to a Former President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud through his bagman Mohamed Iman Mohamed (owner of Tiribo Express LTD, Target Group LTD, and other shady companies). This same Mohamed Iman Mohamed is the son of Mohamud Moallim’s sister and was the main operator who managed the entire theft.
This is not a “mismanagement.” This is outright criminal looting of food meant for hungry children, women, and elders dying from drought.
My American legal team has already prepared formal complaints to the US Department of Justice, FBI, IRS, Treasury, Minnesota Attorney General, and others. We are demanding immediate forensic audits of ARAHA’s fake IRS reports and all their Somalia scams since 2020. No more fake audits and fake projects. These American-registered thieves must be exposed and punished.
THESE ARE ENABLERS IN DEFRAUDING $1,000,000 AID FOR AWDAL
Ahmed Xasan Aw Adan
Mustafe Duuduu
Muxyadiin Cabdi Xaaji Faroole
Faysal maxmuud raage
Ibrahim axmed Xaddi
CALI AXMED XAJI
Several Members of Parliament from Awdal
I have received death threats and cheap insults calling me “anti-Somali.” Let me be very clear: I don’t give a damn. I will not stop. I have exposed corruption even when my own tribe and community members were involved - including this $1,000,000 scam by Awdal MPs and others. Threats will not silence me. Name-calling will not stop me. I will keep fighting until these criminals are in jail and the stolen money is returned to the people of Awdal.
FAKE SITES
BAKI District
1.Jaaraahoroto; *R.Nuur*
2.Garbahaarey; *R.Nuur*
3.Jufada; *Jibraacin*
4.Loolomoodka;*R.Nuur*
5.Xeego; *H.Cafaan* *mixed*
6.Badanbad; *HC* - *Musafiin*
7.Daray-Quruxsan;*HC* - *Musafiin*
*BORAMA DISTRICT
1. Sog-Sogley; *Mixed(all tribes*
2. Cige Cade; 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐟𝐢𝐢𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐫 𝐀𝐡𝐦𝐞𝐝
3. Maraaley; *JY*
4. Qol-Qol; *JY* - *R.Axmed*
5. Jirjirka; *HC -Xeebjire*
6. Caradamadow; *HC -Xeebjire*
7. Mataanaha; *HC -Xeebjire*
8. Saw; *Mixed All tribes*
People of Awdal, wake up! Your children are starving while these shameless parasites are eating your food aid in Mogadishu
.
Enough is enough. Share this letter everywhere. Expose these thieves. Demand justice.
No more stolen aid. No more lies.
$20 Million in U.S. Taxpayer Funds Will Be Stolen by the Expired Regime in Mogadishu Within 48 Hours Unless President Trump Takes Action in the Next 24 Hours
My oversight investigation has uncovered significant whistleblower information and documentary evidence requiring additional forensic analysis before publication. The investigation examines financial and operational links involving SoDMA under Commissioner Mohamud Moallim, Minnesota-registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations, private entities operating in Somalia’s humanitarian sector, and information relating to former President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, caretaker Prime Minister Hamza Abdi Barre, and caretaker Finance Minister Bihi Iman Egeh. The volume and seriousness of the evidence raise serious concerns about the integrity of humanitarian assistance intended for Somalia’s most vulnerable citizens.
Among the most significant statements currently under review are whistleblower claims originating from sources within Somalia’s Office of the Prime Minister and Ministry of Finance concerning a reported $20 million World Bank/IDA emergency drought-relief allocation recently received by SoDMA. According to these sources, approximately $5 million was contributed by Somalia and $15 million was financed through international development assistance. The sources further stated that roughly 90% of the cash deposited into SoDMA accounts at the Central Bank of Somalia originates from international development agency (IDA World Bank) funded by U.S. taxpayers. The whistleblower states claim that funds intended for drought-affected communities may have been diverted or subjected to improper influence, including that approximately $5 million was directed to former President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, $5 million to caretaker Prime Minister Hamza Abdi Barre, $5 million retained within SoDMA-controlled accounts, and that caretaker Finance Minister Bihi Iman Egeh allegedly sought an additional $3 million kickback before authorizing further disbursement.
LI is concerned over Somalia’s constitutional crisis.
LI supports our member, Cahdi Party's work for constitutional integrity, and an inclusive, lawful path back to democratic stability is essential.
Political legitimacy must be restored in Somalia!
U.S. Complicity and Spineless Neutrality Amid Somalia Southwest State Crisis
It is alarming that, in response to President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s unprecedented corruption and lawlessness, the U.S. State Department and Department of Defense issued statements dripping with neutrality and moral evasion. Their vague references to “shared security interests” dangerously ignore reality on the ground.
According to statements directly received by the Daily Caller from both the U.S. State Department and Department of Defense , a State Department spokesperson acknowledged awareness of bribery allegations and claimed that the Trump administration “maintains a firm zero tolerance policy for waste, theft, or diversion of U.S. resources.” The spokesperson further stated that, while legal decisions on elections and mandates are for Somalis to make, “it is vital Somalia focus on poal-Shabaabconciliation and reducing the internal strife hampering the fight against al-Shabaab and IS IS.”
A Pentagon official, also quoted directly by the Daily Caller, stated that “While the Department of War does not comment on operational details, the United States maintains its strategic partnership with the Federal Government of Somalia. In northern Somalia, AFRICOM, alongside the Federal Government of Somalia and Somali Armed Forces, has conducted airstrikes to degrade ISIS-Somalia's ability to threaten the U.S. Homeland, our forces, and our citizens abroad. In southern Somalia, AFRICOM, also in close coordination with the Federal Government of Somalia, has conducted airstrikes to enable partner forces’ ability to degrade al-Shabaab. Our strategic approach to countering terrorism in Africa relies on trusted partnerships and collaboration grounded in and through shared security interests.”
These statements show dangerous detachment from reality. President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, Somalia’s most corrupt leader, is actively conspiring to overthrow the legitimate Southwest State government using elite Somali military units - Danab, Gorgor, Harimacad, and SNA - trained, armed, and funded by the U.S., U.K., European partners, and Turkey. These forces target defenseless citizens already suffering from severe drought, mass displacement, and humanitarian crises.
By claiming neutrality while this president collaborates with Al-Shabaab, U.S. officials fail to protect civilians and are complicit in a campaign endangering Somali lives and U.S. per sonnel. The claim that “legal decisions are for Somalis” is a transparent excuse to ignore flagrant human rights violations, constitutional breaches, and Southwest State sovereignty. U.S. forces face predictable risk from the president’s reckless actions - avoidable if leadership prioritized oversight over political convenience.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio prioritizes Latin American politics, aggressive actions against Cuba, and Miami-based Venezuela fundraisers over protecting U.S. personnel and Somali civilians. This misplaced focus leaves Southwest State citizens and U.S. forces dangerously exposed.
As a U.S. and Somali citizen, I demand the U.S. Government immediately:
1.Cease operational support enabling President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s campaign against Southwest State citizens.
2.Publicly recognize the ongoing illegality and corruption of the Somali Federal Government under Mohamud.
3.Ensure U.S.-trained units are never used for internal political repression or human rights abuses.
Failure to act is not negligence; it is complicity in the systematic persecution of Southwest State citizens. The U.S., as a primary supporter of Somali security forces, must prevent the weaponization of its resources for domestic tyranny and civilian suffering.
The world is watching. Spineless neutrality is no longer acceptable.
https://t.co/Nynqtv9Vjc
@UKinSomalia@StateDept@HassanSMohamud@SomaliainQatar@UAEinSomalia@ChineseSomalia@US2SOMALIA@EU_in_Somalia@ItalyinSomalia@UNSomalia@TC_MogadisuBE
Ref: GSH/XX/CXA/INT_Som_84 Date: 26/03/2026
To: All Ambassadors and Heads of International Missions to the Federal Republic of Somalia
Subject: Final Notice - End of Diplomatic Evasion, Complicity, Silence, and Violations of Somali Sovereignty, Constitutional Order, and Public Security
This communication constitutes a formal legal and political notice to every diplomatic mission operating in Somalia. After years of calculated silence, selective outrage, and deliberate avoidance of factual accountability, the Somali people and their lawful representatives will no longer tolerate diplomatic double standards or hypocritical engagement that privileges convenience over principle, privilege over justice, and foreign agendas over Somali constitutional sovereignty. The posture of “waiting on dialogue” while glaring violations occur amounts to diplomatic facilitation of impunity and is unacceptable.
The European Union and United Kingdom have repeatedly proclaimed their commitment to the rule of law, democratic governance, and respect for constitutional order, yet their recent statements and actions - or more accurately, their selective inaction - expose a profound pattern of diplomatic hypocrisy. You raise public concern over procedural or symbolic matters, such as the designation of Somali ministers as persona non grata or other internal diplomatic protocols, while remaining conspicuously silent on far more consequential violations: repeated breaches of Somalia’s Provisional Constitution, unilateral executive overreach, and the deliberate undermining of federal structures designed to safeguard Somali unity. By tolerating, enabling, and indirectly legitimizing actions that clearly exceed the legal authority of the current administration, you have undermined Somali federalism, weakened democratic institutions, and eroded public confidence in the rule of law.
Yet, when it comes to the deportation of Somali nationals and dual citizens residing in Europe, your concern is not driven by principle, due process, or legal integrity, but by domestic political expediency and electoral calculations. You appear primarily motivated by the potential political gain of exploiting immigration policies to appeal to voters in upcoming EU and UK elections, rather than by any consistent application of international law or human rights standards. This selective advocacy exposes the transactional nature of your engagement with Somalia: legal principles are invoked when convenient and ignored when they conflict with strategic, economic, or electoral interests. The clear implication is that your public support for constitutional governance applies only when it aligns with European domestic priorities, not when it would meaningfully defend the sovereignty, rights, and dignity of the Somali people.
By simultaneously negotiating back-channel agreements that facilitate the forced deportation of Somali citizens without due process, while publicly preaching adherence to the rule of law, you engage in conduct that is legally and ethically indefensible. This behavior constitutes bad faith engagement and a deliberate breach of international norms regarding state responsibility, human rights, and respect for the sovereignty of partner states. The Somali people are fully aware of this duplicity: they see the disconnect between what is publicly claimed and what is privately tolerated or arranged. Such duplicity does not merely undermine credibility; it constitutes active facilitation of policies that harm Somali citizens, weaken Somali governance structures, and erode trust between Somalia and the international community.
The United States has also failed in its legal, moral, and operational obligations by remaining silent while the current Somali administration has transferred U.S.-supplied weapons, military equipment, and ammunition under conditions that create a direct and unprecedented risk of operational compromise. These transfers have blurred the line between legitimate Somali National Army operations and potential Al-Shabaab infiltration, substantially increasing the likelihood of misidentification, accidental engagement, and operational failure. This reckless handling of military assets places U.S. personnel stationed at Balidoogle Airbase, other strategic locations, Somali security forces, and civilian populations in immediate and grave danger. Baledogle Airfield, a critical hub for counterterrorism operations, intelligence gathering, and regional security coordination, depends on clear command structures, asset accountability, and force integrity. By allowing or failing to prevent the misuse or improper transfer of military materiel, operational integrity at the base has been compromised, and the strategic value of the installation is under serious threat.
The continued silence of the United States - through its Embassy in Mogadishu, AFRICOM, and other national security institutions - is deeply alarming and cannot be justified as prudence or neutrality. This is a dereliction of legal and operational responsibility under both bilateral security agreements and established international norms regarding the transfer and use of military equipment in partner nations. By failing to publicly address or act against these violations, the United States is tacitly enabling conditions that threaten not only Somali sovereignty and governance but also the lives and safety of U.S. personnel and regional partners. Every day that this silence continues, the risk of catastrophic misidentification, accidental conflict, or operational compromise increases exponentially. The Somali people and legitimate national security authorities are fully aware that this inaction represents a failure to uphold the most basic principles of military accountability, lawful oversight, and ethical partnership. Silence in this context is not neutrality; it is a direct threat to both Somali and U.S. security interests, a breach of trust, and a dereliction of the obligations that the United States voluntarily assumed when committing military support to Somalia.
Türkiye’s position is equally revealing and profoundly troubling. The complete absence of any statement or action regarding the ongoing constitutional violations, political destabilization, and breaches of Somali legal norms in the Southwest State is neither neutral nor accidental; it is a deliberate and calculated choice that exposes the priorities guiding Türkiye’s engagement in Somalia. This posture reflects a policy firmly rooted in economic capture, resource control, and long-term strategic influence rather than respect for Somali sovereignty, democratic governance, or constitutional order. Through non-transparent agreements with an administration whose legal legitimacy is rapidly deteriorating, Türkiye has secured access to Somalia’s most valuable natural resources, including oil, gas, and minerals, as well as critical infrastructure and investment concessions, without any meaningful accountability or parliamentary oversight. These arrangements are structured to guarantee long-term benefit to Turkish interests regardless of the Somali public or constitutional compliance, effectively placing economic gain above the rule of law.
Such alignments are not partnerships in any authentic sense; they are strategic entrenchments designed to consolidate influence and extract wealth while the current regime remains in power, even as its mandate and legitimacy are nearing expiration. By remaining silent on the flagrant violation of Somalia’s constitution and the destabilization of the Southwest State, Türkiye is complicit in undermining national governance structures and emboldening unlawful actions by the outgoing administration. This calculated inaction sends a clear message that foreign economic and strategic advantage takes precedence over legal compliance, accountability, and the rights of the Somali people. It erodes public trust, deepens perceptions of foreign manipulation, and threatens to institutionalize a system in which Somali natural resources are controlled and exploited by external actors at the expense of Somali sovereignty and the rule of law. History will record this deliberate choice as a prioritization of foreign strategic interests over the welfare, dignity, and lawful governance of Somalia.
The Chinese government’s position in Somalia is similarly revealing and demonstrates a deliberate policy of selective engagement and strategic self-interest masquerading as neutrality. China routinely invokes the principle of “non-interference in internal affairs” as a shield to justify inaction in the face of clear constitutional violations, political destabilization, and breaches of legal norms. Yet, when strategic or economic interests are at stake, this principle is abandoned, and selective interventions are made under the guise of humanitarian aid, development assistance, or investment projects. These interventions are neither transparent nor accountable and are often targeted to strengthen specific factions or to influence political outcomes in ways that serve Chinese objectives rather than Somali governance or public welfare.
China’s approach systematically prioritizes geopolitical and economic advantage over the sovereignty, rule of law, and democratic governance of Somalia. By funding projects or channeling assistance to particular regions or communities while ignoring the legal and constitutional framework of the federal government, China undermines the authority of Somali institutions and enables political actors who act against the Somali Constitution. This selective engagement fosters dependency, weakens Somali state structures, and perpetuates the exploitation of Somalia’s political and economic resources for foreign gain. Such actions are not acts of neutrality; they are calculated strategies that advance foreign interests at the expense of the Somali people, their sovereignty, and the integrity of their legal system. The Somali public and government are fully aware of this duplicity, and history will record these actions as a deliberate choice to manipulate Somalia for strategic advantage while hiding behind the rhetoric of non-interference.
International financial institutions, including the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, have exhibited a pattern of institutional silence and willful inattention that effectively endorses the status quo, irrespective of the repeated and well-documented violations of Somali law and constitutional processes. Rather than exercising oversight or holding Somali governance structures accountable for their procedural and legal failures, these organizations continue to operate under outdated, technocratic frameworks that prioritize project implementation and disbursement schedules over the protection of Somali sovereignty, public interest, and the rule of law. By treating Somalia as a laboratory for experimental programs and policy interventions, insulated from legal compliance and meaningful accountability, these institutions undermine both the legitimacy of their own mandates and the capacity of Somali institutions to exercise authority in accordance with national law. This approach perpetuates systemic governance failures, normalizes impunity, and entrenches a model in which international agendas override Somali legal and constitutional prerogatives.
Your collective silence is not the product of complexity, operational constraints, or the exigencies of diplomacy; it is a deliberate choice motivated by self-interest, risk aversion, and the desire to preserve privileged postings, luxurious lifestyles, and unfettered access to corridors of political and economic power. This pattern of inaction reflects a calculated prioritization of personal comfort and institutional convenience over the rule of law, constitutional integrity, and the welfare of the Somali people. Every day that violations occur without challenge, every time illegal or unconstitutional actions are tolerated without consequence, these choices embolden the actors responsible and send a clear signal that foreign missions are willing to overlook corruption, abuse, and breaches of sovereignty to protect their own security, benefits, and strategic influence.
The Somali people are fully aware of this duplicity. They see clearly who chooses to speak and who remains silent, who actively tolerates violations, and who benefits materially, politically, or strategically from continued ambiguity and institutional inaction. Your failure to uphold principles of accountability and transparency is not hidden; it is evident in the patterns of engagement and non-engagement that shape public perception. The legitimacy of foreign missions’ rests not only on rhetoric but on actions consistent with law, principle, and ethical responsibility. By consistently failing to act when Somali constitutional order and public welfare are under threat, you have forfeited moral authority and undermined the credibility of your own institutions. This deliberate neglect cannot continue unnoticed, and the Somali people - and the new government - will hold all actors accountable for these choices.
Let this letter serve as a formal, unequivocal, and binding notice to all foreign actors, diplomatic missions, international organizations, and financial institutions operating in Somalia. Following the formation of a new government after 15 May 2026, every bilateral and multilateral agreement, resource concession, security cooperation instrument, deportation arrangement, development program, and aid framework—regardless of its origin, sponsor, or scope - will be subjected to a comprehensive, rigorous, and legally binding audit conducted by Somalia’s lawful institutions. These audits will examine compliance with the Somali Constitution, adherence to national legal frameworks, conformity with international legal norms, and alignment with the public interest of Somali citizens.
Any agreement or arrangement found to have been executed in violation of Somali constitutional provisions, federal laws, international legal obligations, or the legitimate rights and interests of the Somali people will be formally submitted to the House of the People. Such agreements will be declared null and void, immediately rescinded, and all benefits, privileges, or entitlements arising from them will be reversed or annulled. Evidence of criminality, corruption, mismanagement, or any form of legal violation uncovered during these audits will be referred without exception to appropriate Somali and international judicial and investigative authorities for formal investigation, prosecution, and accountability. This process will include but is not limited to scrutiny of resource extraction contracts, international aid and development programs, military assistance, deportation arrangements, and financial agreements.
The Somali state asserts that these actions are not discretionary; they are a legal obligation to restore and uphold the rule of law, national sovereignty, and the constitutional rights of Somali citizens. All international actors, partners, and institutions are hereby placed on notice: compliance with Somali law, transparency, and accountability will no longer be optional, negotiable, or subject to selective enforcement. Any failure to comply, any attempt to evade scrutiny, or any continuation of prior complicity will be considered a violation of Somali sovereignty and subject to full legal consequence under Somali and international law.
Somalia’s sovereignty is absolute. Its Constitution is supreme. Its people will no longer accept diplomatic double standards, selective outrage, institutional complacency, or the prioritization of foreign convenience over domestic law and justice. The days of silence, evasion, complicity, and tolerance of unlawful conduct are over. The era of Somali public interest, constitutional supremacy, and rigorous, transparent accountability has begun. Every foreign actor operating in Somalia should now recalibrate their engagement in full recognition that continued inaction or complicity will no longer be tolerated and will carry consequences under Somali law and oversight.
Respectfully,
📷
Dr. Abdillahi Hashi Abib - BA, MA, MASc, Ph.D
Member of Foreign Affairs Committee
Leader of Accountability and Transparency Caucus
The House of People of the Federal Republic of Somalia
E: [email protected]
W: + 1-571-436-7586
https://t.co/oWMngXnTmp
@court_afchpr@IntlCrimCourt@UN_HRC@IPUparliament@WilliamsRuto@SuluhuSamia@KagutaMuseveni@SouthSudanGov@PaulKagame@GeneralNeva@FelixUdps@EACJCourt@EA_Bunge@golaha_shacabka@HouseForeignGOP@realDonaldTrump@StateDept@SpeakerJohnson@susiewiles2024@HassanSMohamud@TheVillaSomalia@HamzaAbdiBarre@AadanMadobe@SomaliainQatar@MOFAKuwait@UAEinSomalia@ChineseSomalia@KSAmofaEN@US2SOMALIA@EU_in_Somalia@ItalyinSomalia@UNSomalia@TC_MogadisuBE@UNDPSomalia@WorldBankAfrica@IMFAfrica@CanHCKenya@SwissEmbassyKE