I am genuinely stunned that hardly anyone has shown any intent to protest against the flawed reservation system or even raise their voice against it.
Unfortunately, there’s no funding for such causes.
I am all for reservation based on financial need, to help people uplift themselves. But reservation for people living in bungalows? 🤦🏼♂️
> open twitter
> some dalit seething about veg-naan veg
> some dalit sucking off ELund. sAar paniya oligarch oppress me sAar
> some dalit talm CJPeee
> foidslop
> groyper babu posting outdated ss on nifty crashing
why is everything so exhausting on the "everything" app.
Really makes me question reasoning ability of the lot. This isn't first time an airport is named by a sitting pm, on top he is longest serving pm of India. So were we creating rajiv,indra religions all this time with airports after their name. 🤡🤡
Mr. Musk, yes, no billionaire should dictate a nation’s policy - Indian or American.
India must welcome competition in satellite internet, from Indian and global providers, whoever offers the most practical and affordable last-mile solution for those in remote regions. In countries with lower per-capita incomes, satellite internet must be affordable too. High subscription fees and equipment costs risk putting it beyond the reach of ordinary households. Connectivity must bridge the digital divide, not create a new one.
India knows our networks and spectrum are strategic infrastructure, not merely commercial assets. India’s national security safeguards are non-negotiable.
Every country makes choices based on its own interests. Those in the West cannot preach free markets while practicing protectionism at home. USA imposed 100% tariffs on Chinese EVs to protect its domestic industry, just as India takes measures to protect its own domestic manufacturers. Both India and the US have restricted Huawei over security concerns. One cannot demand a level playing field from others only when it suits its own agenda.
Indians will internally debate, question and address our strengths and shortcomings as a democratic country.
Take BharatNet, India’s programme to bring broadband to village-level local bodies. We will question why, as the CAG’s 2026 audit report found, the programme is struggling to meet its original objectives. Why were only 33.2% of service-ready Gram Panchayats operational, despite ₹39,888 crore being spent? At the same time, we know to appreciate our telecom sector and regulations, which has made internet data among the world’s most affordable, bringing millions online.
India is a democracy, not a colony. We welcome the world, but we, the Indian people, will decide our own future - not Western vested interests, their double standards or any billionaire - Indian or American.
Dear Prime Minister Ambani,
Please accept my humble apologies for not realizing that you are the real boss of India.
Naturally, you would prefer to maintain your monopolistic exploitation of the great people of India, but would you nonetheless consider allowing Starlink to compete?
There are many areas of India, as there are in all countries, with no Internet access, which denies children the opportunity for education and for small businesses the opportunity to sell their goods to a global market. Starlink would change their lives for the better.
Thank you 🙏
Never in India's history has so many entities come together to move a person out of power. If he goes on to win 2029, it would be one of single biggest W in India's history.
@ShreyashSiddha2@striver_79 Lol no, the primary reason was american govt perceiving Huawei as a national threat due to close ties with Chinese govt. The iran case was a small part of it. The primary driver was Chinese control of Huawei.
@ShreyashSiddha2@striver_79 Huawei complied with American laws, why weren't they allowed? Chinese state linked telecom companies weren't given clearance, why?? So much for open market.
@ShreyashSiddha2@striver_79 Lol why doesn't usa allow BYD? Also what about security implications in jnk and NE? 🤡, every country decides on what bests for them.
Good News
An appellate court in Saudi Arabia has sentenced Anojan Sivarasa, a 24-year-old Sri Lankan expatriate, to death for making derogatory remarks against Prophet Muhammad on Facebook.
Anyone making derogatory remarks against Prophet Muhammad will now tremble with fear.