I live for reading good books, listening to good musics, looking at good pictures, and watching good movies. I like Apple/Fender/Matsuda/PRS/Suhr. よろしくね
ChatGPT-6 Astra composes a complete fugue in the style of Bach -- in a single prompt. This is the most impressive musical feat I’ve ever seen from an LLM.
紙VSタブレットーどちらで読んだ方が定着率が高いのか
①紙での読解は、デジタル機器よりも内容の理解度が明らかに高い。
②制限時間がある状況や論理的な説明文を読む際、紙の優位性はさらに広がる。
③デジタル機器に慣れた世代でも紙の方が理解しやすく、その傾向は年々強まっている。
【補足】
①デジタル機器を使えば使うほど浅い処理をする癖がつき、それが読解の質を低下させる。これは「浅い処理仮説/Shallowing Hypothesis」として知られ���いる。どうも、日常的にデジタルの機能(通知やショート動画の視聴にともなう集中力の切り替え)に触れていると、情報を深く考えずに処理するようになる。その癖がタブレットで読書をするときに発動するようだ。
②時間制限があると効率的な読解をしようとするため浅い処理が誘発されやすく、論理的な文章は物語文よりも負荷が高い(集中しないと難しい!)ため紙媒体でじっくりと呼んだ方が理解度が高まる。繰り返すが、デジタル機器自体が浅い情報処理を誘発しやすく、そこに上記の条件が追加されるとさらに浅い読解になる。
③小学生、中高生、大学生、そして専門職に至るまで、どの教育レベルや年齢層においても、紙媒体のほうがデジタルよりも一貫して読解スコアが高いことが明らかになった。以前はデジタル機器に不慣れだから紙での読書のほうが優位になると考えられていたが、2000年から2017年にかけて年々紙の優位性が高まっていることから反証されている。
ちなみに、デジタルでの浅い処理を緩和させるためには読解させたあとにキーワードを書かせる、要約させる。思い出させるなどの学習方略がある。それらを追加で実施すれば「スクリーン劣等性/Screen inferiority」がいくらか緩和される。
被引用:1481
レベル:★★★★★
(メタ分析、54研究、N=171055)
【出典】
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23-38.
This is one of the most famous paintings in America, and most people have no idea what they are actually looking at...
The painting is Christina's World, made by Andrew Wyeth in 1948, and the woman was real: her name was Anna Christina Olson, Wyeth's neighbour in Cushing, Maine. Since childhood a degenerative condition had slowly taken the strength from her legs, until walking was no longer possible. She refused a wheelchair, and for her entire adult life she chose to drag herself across the ground with her arms instead, going wherever she wanted to go under her own power.
Wyeth saw her one afternoon from an upstairs window, alone in that vast field, crawling slowly toward the house on the hill. He said the painting was an attempt to do justice to her extraordinary conquest of a life which most people would consider hopeless. Her world, he said, was limited physically but by no means spiritually.
That is what turns this painting from a portrait of frailty into one of the most triumphant images ever made...
Look at it long enough and it stops being about what her body took from her, and becomes about what she would not stop doing anyway. The field is enormous and she is small and the house is far away, and still she goes, because the alternative, to be carried, to give up, to let the distance win, was something she simply would not accept.
There is one more thing: Christina loved this painting. Pink was her favorite color, and Wyeth had placed her exactly where she most wanted to be, out in the open, in her own field, under her own sky. Late in her life, when she could no longer even crawl out to that field, she said something that holds the whole meaning of art inside it:
"Andy put me where he knew I wanted to be. Now that I can’t be there anymore, all I do is think of that picture, and I’m there."