🚨UPDATE: Andrew & Tristan Tate could be released from jail VERY SOON as their lawyer (@McBrideLawNYC) URGES a non corrupt judge to free them.😳
The judge will give the verdict SOON.
Our prayers are working‼️
Keep notis on for the latest 🔔
Candace’s claim is that the fed narrative is a lie and so she investigates every possible lead and theory.
Andrew’s (stated) position is that Tyler Robinson did it alone and the evidence is so strong that he’ll wipe the floor with anyone that wants to debate that.
But Andrew’s actual goal seems to be to try to quote farm a bunch of out of context moments from throughout Candace’s year long investigation to try to win word games interrogating her body of work.
Because he’s scared to debate the central point- the feds, TPUSA’s, and his claim that the evidence is overwhelming that Tyler did it all on his own.
It’s even implied that the evidence is so overwhelming that it’s morally wrong for Candace to investigate at all.
Candace is offering Andrew the opportunity of a lifetime right now. But she’s correctly asserting that the first topic of discussion should be the actual evidence in the murder if Charlie Kirk. Not Andrew’s opinion of Candace’s podcast. Though she graciously offered to field all his very important concerns about her show in the second half of the discussion.
The only reason he would be saying no at this point is because he doesn’t want the central point to be about the fed narrative and the overwhelming evidence. Because Andrew doesn’t seem to actually affirmatively believe that.
He’s just interested in trying to mud wrestle with snippets of Candace’s past work.
That’s how it looks to me from out here having watched them go back and forth all day.
It’s amusing. But I hope Andrew actually takes the opportunity. Im sure it’ll make great television.
You cannot make the debate claim something that neither you nor I have ever stated. LOL That’s not how debates work.
YOU have claimed the evidence against Tyler Robinson is overwhelming and crystal clear. I have disputed that entirely and offered many alternative pieces of evidence that I feel should be thoroughly explored which poke holes in the official story.
The debate topics should be in this order:
1) Is there “overwhelming” “crystal clear” evidence that Tyler Robinson assassinated Charlie Kirk, as Andrew Wilson and a great many others have stated? (Claim made by Andrew)
2) Are the alternative theories presented by Candace regarding Charlie’s assassination viable? (Claim(s) made by Candace)
I get the feeling you don’t actually believe the evidence against Tyler Robinson is overwhelming at all.
Just a hunch. Prove me wrong.
Hahhahahahahaha!
They seriously CANNOT defend the claim that the evidence against Tyler Robinson is overwhelming.
They state it as fact all the time, but they whine like four year olds when you force them to defend it on a debate stage.
So Candace has now agreed to the 300k, Michael Knowles moderating and TPUSA doesn’t have to admit he’s on their payroll. She’s 7 months pregnant so it has to be at her studio. She’s also actually famous and threatened constantly.
0 chance Andrew accepts. Comment what his excuse will be.
I wonder how much Rogan got paid to have him on. Probably a new pair of stilts and some head grease
Andrew & Tristan Tate could be released as their lawyer @McBrideLawNYC pushes a U.S. judge to free them.‼️🚨
The judge will now decide whether the brothers remain behind bars or await extradition outside of jail.
Why do American Jews have to do this job? Why TF aren’t there at least 20,000 Israeli Jews willing to step up and do it?
You’re telling me that in a country with 7.8 million Jews there aren’t 20,000 willing to do the right thing? That’s only 0.2% of the population.
Do y’all see now why we say it’s the WHOLE COUNTRY not just Netanyahu???
"This isn't fair at all" LOL.
How can we further accommodate you, Andrew? I traveled to Los Angeles, surrounded myself with 20 feminists for a debate via Jubilee—I did not get to set the terms, or bring in my own team for live fact-checks and yet I managed to get through it with less whining than you right now. I never once described it as "unfair" or as a "lion's den". I literally traveled with one person.
You are debating just one person. We are allowing you to bring a rapper-sized entourage, plus your own camera and agreed to the moderator that you selected.
Would you like us to provide lunch? How can we make this debate more cushiony for you so you don't pretend it's somehow unfair at the outset.
Stop adding in these stupid last minute addendums. “You lose by default if you use an ad hominem attack”.
Stop being so soft. The public will decide who the winner and loser is and you don’t get to direct them in that judgement with some obscure fine print clause.
I’ve literally never heard of a person try to negotiate an automatic win clause LMAO.
Glad we’ve agreed. My team will reach out to iron out the details.
See you on Friday.
It certainly looks as though whoever is on that rooftop has on a jacket of sorts, which again, matches the description given by Dylan Hope.
Important to note that Dylan Hope said when police initially approached them they showed his coworker a picture of the suspect and the coworker said “yes, that’s him”… Dylan said the person in those pictures was NOT the same person as the one in the photos released by the FBI the next morning.
They absolutely CANNOT defend the nonsensical claim that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk with a .30-06 from the Losee Center roof.
So they refuse to debate it, which is what is happening here. That’s exactly what he’s saying in this post.
They also are sending in someone who wasn’t there, can’t speak for TPUSA or answer any questions, and will just keep saying he doesn’t know the answers.
Hey, at least they’re willing to pay $300,000 for the trouble.
Sure you can get a clarification:
Yes, next Friday would work with me.
Yes, you can bring your cameraman if he makes you feel better. So you are now approved to bring four members of your team, plus a cameraman, plus I have just approved your moderator. (For clarity, this makes your team bigger than my own, and I am fine with that).
No, you don’t get to now add in this weird stipulation regarding a “one hour cross examination”. You have been requesting a debate since May. We will debate the Tyler Robinson case and the evidence which you claim is overwhelming.
And I said as long as it takes. No time limit. If you feel it can be done in 3 1/2 hours, then great. If you need longer then we can keep going.
The only sports apparel company in the entire world saying men shouldn’t be able to compete in women’s sports is @xx_xyathletics. They just had their best day and week of sales in history this week. Go buy the gear. Make a statement. https://t.co/zANz3iYIcT