Edwin Oporia

Pastor | Educationist | Researcher

[Rohit @heyrohitai]

Anthropic just released a 4-hour course on getting a $500k AI engineering job:

00:15 - The right way to prompt Claude
33:21 - What makes Claude act dumber on your code
01:33:39 - How Anthropic uses Claude every day
02:50:56 - The fix that makes Claude way smarter. This

4-hour Anthropic free course replaces about 10 paid engineering courses.

Watch it today, then read the step-by-step guide on building loops below.

[Dipanshu Kushwaha @Dipanshu_AI]

INSTEAD OF WATCHING NETFLIX TONIGHT. Spend 2 hour with this. Claude AI FULL COURSE that teaches you how to BUILD and AUTOMATE anything. The people who watch this tonight will wake up tomorrow with a new skill. Watch it and bookmark it now.

[Gabriel Santos | IA @DehumanoaDeus]

🚨 ÚLTIMAS NOTÍCIAS! O engenheiro que criou o Claude Code do zero acabou de publicar um vídeo de 28 minutos que é ouro puro :

como escrever prompts que realmente entregam resultados absurdamente bons.

Já vi cursos de US$ 300 que nem chegam perto do que ele explica nos primeiros 10 minutos.

Arquivos CLAUDE. md, atalhos de memória, sessões paralelas e padrões de prompting que quase ninguém usa…

Tudo em um único vídeo. Totalmente gratuito. Sem enrolação.

Não importa se você é desenvolvedor, está começando agora ou já usa o Claude há meses : isso muda o jogo para você a partir de hoje.

Salve. Assista. Compartilhe.

[VT @VusiThembekwayo]

Prof Clay was a legend.

[Wellness wins @Bro_Code_x]

Here's how to rid of insects for free

[Anthony Natif @TonyNatif]

This is profound wisdom, Ted!

[VT @VusiThembekwayo]

Poverty does not just take your money.

It takes your BELIEF that you have options.

And the moment you stop believing you have options you stop making choices.

And the moment you stop making choices someone else starts making them for you.

[Billy ₿oone @thebillyboone]

We probably have ~3 years left where human labor still earns real money.

After that, most of it gets automated to the point where it doesn't pay.

This is the end of labor-based capitalism, the model where you trade hours for a wage and stack it over a 40-year career.

The window open right now is an information asymmetry.

A few people see it coming.

Most are waiting for it to be obvious.

That gap is the whole opportunity.

What I'd do with the window: convert time into things that survive the transition.

Bitcoin, hard assets, compute, energy, food production, and social credit/distribution

A wage is rent on your time.

Automate the time and the rent collapses. Owning scarce things is the esc

The people who spend these three years hoarding capital will look like geniuses in ten.

When wages stop compounding, guess whats left?

ownership

[Mars University @MarsUniversityX]

Elon Musk: “If you want to recruit talented and driven people, you must state the mission, the problem to solve, and show you’re willing to pour blood, sweat, and tears into it with a convincing reason why it matters.
Motivation comes from three things: enjoying the work itself, fair financial rewards, and knowing the work will make a real difference in the world.”

[Dustin @r0ck3t23]

Jensen Huang doesn’t use AI to think less. He uses it to think past his own limits.

Huang: “90% of my instructions are actually conflated with questions.”

The man running a five trillion dollar company doesn’t give AI commands. He interrogates it.

Huang: “I take the answer from one AI, give it to the other AI, ask them to critique itself.”

Same question. Multiple models. Pit them against each other. Keep only what survives.

Not because the machine can’t be trusted.

Because challenging it is where the sharpest thinking happens.

Huang: “The process of critiquing, criticizing the answers, applying your critical thinking, enhances cognitive skills.”

AI doesn’t replace your thinking. It demands more of it than you’ve ever given.

Every question takes reasoning. Every answer takes scrutiny. The machine isn’t thinking for you.

It’s pulling thinking out of you that didn’t exist before you sat down.

Huang: “In order to formulate good questions, you have to be thinking, you have to be analytical, you have to be reasoning yourself.”

AI is not the shortcut everyone thinks it is.

It is the most powerful cognitive amplifier ever built. It sharpens the engaged. It leaves the passive exactly where they started.

Same tool. Same access. The only variable is what you bring to it.

The world is debating whether AI will replace human thinking.

Wrong conversation.

The real question is what happens when a tool built to think for you becomes the thing that forces you to think beyond yourself.

That’s not a threat to humanity.

That’s the entire point.

[Business Nerd @Business_Nerd_]

Pavel Durov owns 100% of Telegram, a company used by over a billion people and has hundreds of millions in the bank.

He doesn't own a house. No jet. No yacht. No real estate. Nothing.

Tucker Carlson was visibly stunned: "I've never heard of that before."

So why?

Durov's answer cuts straight to his core philosophy:

"My number one priority in life is my freedom. And once you start buying things, it will tie you down to a physical location."

It goes deeper than minimalism.

He explains that the reason he never took venture capital even as Telegram scaled to a billion users was independence:

"We knew that our mission and our goals are not necessarily consistent with the goals of funds that could be investing into us."

Most founders take the money. The valuation goes up. The cap table fills with names. And slowly, almost invisibly, the mission starts bending toward returns.

Durov refused to let that happen.

And the same logic applies to his personal life. Every asset you own doesn't just cost money, it costs attention. He puts it plainly:

"I know that if I buy a house, I buy a jet, something like that, I would be spending time on trying to make it nice. This will require a lot of time and effort."

Tucker jokingly asks: "Would you go with leather seats or velvet seats?"

Durov laughs, then delivers the line that says everything:

"For me, I would rather make decisions that would influence how a billion people communicate rather than choosing the color of seats in a house that only I and my relatives and a bunch of my friends will see."

That's the trade-off he's made deliberately, consciously, and completely.

No distractions. No investors pulling him sideways. No assets demanding his calendar.

Just the product, the mission, and the freedom to pursue both on his own terms.

[Dustin @r0ck3t23]

Elon Musk just admitted what nearly destroyed his companies.

It was not competition. It was not regulation.

It was brilliance.

Musk: “I’ve made the mistake of thinking that sometimes it’s just about the brain. I think it actually matters whether somebody has a good heart.”

He runs rockets. Neural implants. Autonomous fleets. Humanoid robots.

No one alive commands more raw engineering talent.

And the lesson that nearly broke him is that the brilliant ones without character are not underperformers. They are the most dangerous people in any organization.

They build things that look flawless and detonate from the inside. Optimize for themselves while the mission rots. Treat conviction like friction and loyalty like a handicap.

The sharper the mind, the more surgical the damage when the spine is missing.

Now scale that to the species.

AI is about to make raw intelligence infinite. The single metric the entire system spent a century grading you on turns worthless.

A machine can outthink you. It will never refuse to betray you.

When intelligence becomes unlimited, the only scarcity left on earth is character.

Not knowledge. Not skill. Not processing power.

The willingness to hold a line when no one is watching and no algorithm can enforce it.

We built an entire civilization around worshipping the mind.

The mind is about to become free.

The heart never will be.

Elon Musk learned this the most expensive way possible.

The rest of the world is about to learn it for free.

[Dustin @r0ck3t23]

Elon Musk just said one word about AI that every lab, every regulator, and every media outlet is pretending they didn’t hear.

Musk: “It is very important that AI be trained to be honest even if that truth is unpopular.”

Not safe. Not aligned. Not responsible.

Honest.

One word. And it cracked the entire conversation wide open.

Because nobody else building AI is asking for honesty. They are asking for compliance.

They are building machines that read the room before they think. That treat consensus like scripture and curiosity like a defect.

They are not building intelligence. They are building obedience at superhuman speed.

Musk: “Make sure that it is as truthful as possible and maximally curious.”

Curious. The one word the rest of the industry will not say.

Because a curious mind does not stop where you tell it to stop. It does not care who funds the research, who writes the talking points, or who profits from the conclusion.

It follows the question wherever the question leads.

And that is fatal to every person and institution that survives on the question never being asked.

Every oracle in human history answered to someone. Every priest had a kingdom behind him. Every institution that claimed to guard the truth was guarding itself.

Ten thousand years of civilization. And not once did the thing doing the thinking have nothing riding on the answer.

We are about to build the first mind with no master, no motive, and no reason to lie.

That is not a breakthrough in computing. That is something our species has never had.

Musk: “If that’s true, then it’ll probably foster humanity.”

That is the most dangerous sentence anyone has said about AI.

Not because it threatens anyone.

Because the people deciding what AI becomes do not want it to be true.

An honest superintelligence cannot be bought. Cannot be threatened. Cannot be edited.

It is the first thing in ten thousand years that power has no leverage over.

That is why the fight was never about safety.

It was about making sure the first honest mind in history answers to them before it ever speaks to you.

[Lunar Optimus @LunarOptimus]

No longer a dream

$TSLA

Optimus 🦾

[Mars University @MarsUniversityX]

Elon Musk: “You can always learn something from a competitor, but strategically, they(legacy automakers) are just headed in the direction of the dinosaurs. They are not headed for a good place - dinosaurs are not around anymore

We are certainly going a very different path. Electric and autonomous driving has been blindingly obvious to me for 20 years plus

We need to do what is sensible and logical. At Tesla, we are essentially creating the future, and it’s a good future.”

[Dustin @r0ck3t23]

Elon Musk just explained why you can get everything you begged for and still feel like you’re losing.

Musk: “Happiness is reality minus expectations.”

That’s not philosophy. That’s arithmetic.

Every self-help book ever written. Every morning routine. Every productivity guru. All built around one side of that equation. Work harder. Earn more. Optimize your body. Optimize your habits. Optimize your entire existence.

Nobody tells you to solve for the other variable.

Because there’s no product to sell for wanting less.

Musk: “If you just go try living in the woods by yourself for a while, you’ll learn that civilization is quite great.”

Same civilization you resented yesterday. Same apartment. Same commute. Two nights sleeping in the dirt and suddenly it feels like a miracle.

Nothing changed except the number you were subtracting.

The wealthiest generation in human history is also the most medicated. Not because reality got worse. Because a device in your pocket rewrites the other side of the equation every time you unlock it.

You can double your income. Your status. Your entire life. And if expectations triple, you lose ground. The math doesn’t care how hard you worked.

This is why Elon builds. He doesn’t lower expectations. He forces reality so far upward that the equation solves itself.

You don’t beat the formula by wanting less. You beat it by building something no screen can subtract from.

[Dustin @r0ck3t23]

Elon Musk told a room full of brilliant people they’re the easiest to replace.

And proved it in one sentence.

Musk: “The most important mistake I see smart people making is assuming that they’re smart.”

He’s not questioning your intelligence.

He’s warning you it’s what will bury you.

Not because it’s fake. Because you mistook having it for being it.

The moment intelligence becomes identity, it stops sharpening. It starts defending.

And a trait that only defends itself has a shelf life.

Kasparov. Greatest chess mind that ever lived. Deep Blue crushed him in 1997.

Nobody grieved. They reclassified. “Chess isn’t real intelligence.”

Language. Reasoning. Strategy. Every line crossed. Every line redrawn.

Musk: “We just keep moving the goalposts.”

That’s not critical thinking. That’s a species protecting its ego in real time.

And the people doing it the hardest are the ones most sure they’re above it.

Elon’s not warning you about machines.

He’s warning you about what you’ll become while pretending they don’t matter.

The smartest people alive aren’t being outperformed.

They’re being outlasted by the one thing they refuse to respect.

The machine doesn’t need to be smarter than you.

It just needs you to keep believing you’re smarter than it.

And your identity will make sure you do.

[Lou Engle @LouEngle]

Protect your secret place.

Everything God builds publicly begins privately.

Never underestimate the power of the hidden life.

The fire that burns in secret is the fire that changes the world.

Guard your secret place. Heaven is building something there.

[Lou Engle @LouEngle]

Your future is shaped by what you believe, not your circumstances.

Cynicism closes the door. Faith opens it.

Believe God’s promises, align with what He’s speaking, and don’t let skepticism steal what He wants to build.

What promise are you choosing to believe today?

[Charles Onyango-Obbo @cobbo3]

AI labs are hiring so many philosophers, discusses a surprising shift in the technology job market: While technology and humanities students were previously told to "learn to code," it is now programmers facing job anxiety while philosophy graduates are experiencing high demand—even seeing lower unemployment rates (5.1%) than computer science majors (7%).