Eduardo Palomino

[Hardfork Kratter @mattkratter]

Bitcoin Influencers Covering For Blockstream (And Adam Back)

[Ami Hardfork XBT# BIP-110 @MountainHodl21]

So the BIP110ers are behind it 😂😂 this shit can’t be real

[dewmap @separ8]

USDT on Bitcoin is AIDS.
Bitcoiners didn’t ask for the surgery.

Core changed the README to “it’s not appropriate to say what Bitcoin is,” shrugged “what even is spam,” then stuck the patient with an infected needle and called it the free market.

[Hardfork Kratter @mattkratter]

You're going to love the latest on Andy Back and Scamson Mow. This is crazy stuff:
https://t.co/qQmFSir3EO

[Bloomberg @business]

Adam Back has long had a rarefied status in the Bitcoin world, but as the industry undergoes another major shakeout, a number of Bitcoin-related businesses linked to him are showing signs of increasing strain https://t.co/3he2OhNpnC

[Eduardo Palomino @epalominow]

Adam Back Hid a Convicted Felon's Control of Billions, and It Sank His SPAC, Plus Greg Maxwell's Role

https://t.co/zfE7iQSqS7

[boots @moonbootspleb]

Now we know why Core sold their buttholes.

[boots @moonbootspleb]

They’re gonna place the liabilities in their own legal boat and sink their own ship.

Classic scammer behavior.

[Bitcoin News @BitcoinNewsCom]

RIVER SUES BLOCKSTREAM OVER $6.7 MILLION PAYMENT AGREEMENT

River Financial has sued Blockstream Services Canada, alleging breach of contract over a termination agreement requiring Blockstream to pay River roughly $6.7 million.

The agreement included $3.55 million in prepaid refunds and a $3.15 million early termination payment.

[Swiss Hodler @SwissHodler]

Tether is a mega shitcoin, and the failed sidechain Liquid doesn't have liquidity.

[Swiss Hodler @SwissHodler]

LiQuiD NetWorK is out of liquidity 🤡

Feels like I’m asking permission from a bank to transfer my own money.

@Liquid_BTC @AquaBitcoin

[Cato The Elder @CatoTheElder17]

Turns out, it’s also possible to “under-collateralize” on Liquid - someone can take your funds! 😂

Did you trust Andy Back? Big mistake!

[Cyph̷ertux @Cyphertux]

🚨 Ce soir, c’est une dinguerie autour de Liquid : près de 4 000 BTC viennent de sortir de sa réserve. Pour ceux qui découvrent l’affaire : cette réserve constitue le collatéral du peg entre Bitcoin et Liquid. Ces BTC servent notamment à garantir que les LBTC puissent être reconvertis en BTC. Le problème : le mouvement représente quasiment l’intégralité des bitcoins détenus dans cette réserve.

Si ce que nous observons est bien l’intervention de white hats et le message laissé ensuite me laisse penser que c’est le cas la prouesse technique est assez folle. Ils ont réussi à faire sortir plusieurs milliers de BTC d’une infrastructure justement conçue pour sécuriser ces fonds et encadrer les peg-outs.

Puis ils ont laissé un message dans un op_return : “we are whitehats. contact us on chain”

Et surtout, les BTC n’ont pas été immédiatement dispersés ou envoyés dans un mixer. Ils sont restés quasiment intégralement regroupés. C’est justement ce qui me fait dire qu’on n’est pas face à un simple vol destiné à faire disparaître les fonds. Maintenant, j’espère vraiment que Liquid donnera des explications détaillées sur ce qui s’est passé et surtout sur la manière dont ces white hats ont réussi à faire sortir quasiment toute la réserve.

Parce que techniquement, comprendre comment ils ont procédé est probablement encore plus intéressant que les 4000 BTC eux-mêmes. Ce soir, on assiste en direct à une démonstration de sécurité offensive d’un niveau assez exceptionnel, entièrement inscrite sur Bitcoin.

[Cedric Youngelman ⚡️ @CedYoungelman]

Luke Dashjr on what actually belongs on the Bitcoin blockchain:

"Spam is anything the person who's getting it did not solicit, did not consent to. In the context of Bitcoin, that's any data that doesn't involve, in some way, the transfer of coins from one person to another. Everything else is just clogging the network and ruining the experience for everyone else.

People who want to share JPEGs can do that. There are websites for it. There are even decentralized ways to do it, like BitTorrent.

The only reason to do it the way they're doing it — forcing it on-chain — is to intentionally push it onto people who have not consented and explicitly do not want it."

@LukeDashjr on The @_BitcoinMatrix #197

[Eduardo Palomino @epalominow]

@paolobenza es por la mermelada que te dieron...

[hodlonaut @hodlonaut]

6/
On April 29, 2025, the day the PR was locked for being "too heated", Matt Corallo wrote publicly:

"The entire reason for this debate is removing a filter that is going to result in a project (Citrea) shipping a product that generates material UTXO bloat."

His words. Public record.

[Eduardo Palomino @epalominow]

@TFTC21 💩💩💩

[Murern @Bitcoin_Murern]

@hodlonaut @adam3us @crypo_stix @Arthur_van_Pelt @MrHodl >Now make room for more spam
>Now compare them to big blockers
> Call it, "pleb slop"

[Johnny Wilkins @wilkins_jo52699]

@GoMaestroOrg Adam Back never invented Proof of Work or 'Bitcoin Mining' and is lying about it in his Bio.
https://t.co/JdxN6LYIaF