like imagine the psychology of this guy. he’s rewarded for his quick complicity; he’s a link in an evolutionary chain. but a utopian logic would permit ppl to shake off that million+ years of precedent.
sex broadly is the over-determination of a person by their embodied condition, its inter-subjective situatedness.
what would be really nice is if we could induce a sexuation process that ran through the various repressive apparatuses, without stopping at any of them.
while i’m riffing à la gender studies, it’s really incongruous to me that “gender” is derived from “genus” but we have no companion concept for “species”.
so to say a “type” might be a nest of neurotic demands and borrowed schemas. the question “what are we if we have no sex?” is passed over, systematically repressed; in fact, sex might just be the repression of gender generally. how fab is that!
school will i think help with the latter. since the internet is no longer (if ever) an effective tool for meaningful interaction, at least of this nature
it’s somewhat hard for me to grasp that i have the potential to work much harder + produce better research than the standard college-track 20-something. I’m not sure what to do with this information
the other problem is “theory of mind”. kind of related. i’m too out there to clock scholastic aptitude. rn i’m just equipped with a radar for yr Heresy Quotient