@life_lightofmen@Badhombre Sigh. You're still beating this dead horse of yours. I'll use small words so you understand:
Kill Americans: Crime.
Killer of Americans: Enemy.
Refuse to integrate: Not crime. Not enemy.
Have opinion about country you don't like: Not crime. Not enemy.
@life_lightofmen@Badhombre You give the Amish an indefinite pass on integrating, but Muslims have to integrate NOW? You give the Confederacy a pass on *actual killing*, but Muslim citizens must agree with you politically or get denaturalized?
Self-deport yourself.
@life_lightofmen@Badhombre Incorrect, *again*. Revocation of citizenship of known enemies is the very topic at hand. I've once again presented you with a concrete example to back my arguments. This time, proven enemies who killed US soldiers and civilians, and you are trying to wave it off.
@life_lightofmen@Badhombre Or is this what it clearly looks like: yet another racist, xenophobic movement playing dress-up in liberty's clothes?
Delete your account.
@life_lightofmen@Badhombre So, @life_lightofmen, if you're serious about revoking citizenship for "people who want to destroy us", can I count on your support for posthumously revoking the citizenship of the leaders of the CSA, who were responsible for 360,000 US military casualties?
@CynicalPublius Leftist here. Anyone who wears a cross and supports the current administration's treatment of immigrants is guilty of the same logical fallacy as the person whose car you've posted here.