Eric M. Hall

A seasoned product management professional dedicated to bringing people and information together in new and innovative ways.
All posts my own.

[Eric M. Hall @eric_m_hall]

Excited to be attending ISMTE - the best place to learn more about the challenges facing today's managing and technical editors. Come say hello and learn how @Highwire Press, Inc can help you publish more efficiently and with greater impact. #ISMTE2018

[Eric M. Hall @eric_m_hall]

HighWire wins CODiE Award for visualized analytics product - https://t.co/LJK1I16IjD

[Kevin-John Black @KjblackJohn]

Did you see my lovely poster from last year? https://t.co/vEoUJBjglo Come see John Sack @ #ISMTE2017 Plenary Slot

[HighWire Press @highwirepress]

John Sack will be presenting at #ISMTE2017, Plenary Session, 8.11.17, 8:30AM: https://t.co/Rlk9IJiyCQ

[Eric M. Hall @eric_m_hall]

@MartynLawrence @KjblackJohn Nah, just one of my many clones. This one runs on crisps.

[HighWire Press @highwirepress]

SSP 2017: Our team will be on Booth #101A ready to meet you and show you how HighWire can help your publishing program. Stop by and say hi!

[Dan Filby @DanFilby]

SSP 2017: Our team will be on Booth #101A ready to meet you and show you how HighWire can help your publishing program. Stop by and say hi!

[Eric M. Hall @eric_m_hall]

@mehmanib Hi, Bahar. My personal email address is [email protected]

[Eric M. Hall @eric_m_hall]

It is with great sadness that I announce my resignation from PRE. Thanks 2 everyone for your support and encouragement over the years.

[Eric M. Hall @eric_m_hall]

What is the appropriate division of labor? Could peer review standards help in this regard? https://t.co/V5pXyLmcWd

[PRE @PeerReviewEval]

Expectations of peer reviewers at all time high. Standards might help set boundaries. Should Peer Review Catch Fraud?https://t.co/ox9kmgVPn1

[PRE @PeerReviewEval]

Fraud takes many forms and reviewers are ill-equipped to catch them all. Should Peer Review Catch Fraud? https://t.co/yontSbENVV

[Eric M. Hall @eric_m_hall]

There is sufficient supply of reviewers to meet demand if journals expand reviewer pool and keep more detailed records of reviewers. https://t.co/2oXgzbnWWg

[PRE @PeerReviewEval]

Are Journals Lacking for Reviewers? https://t.co/HKTHLUjVUs via @scholarlykitchn

[PRE @PeerReviewEval]

PRE integrating with @ORCID_org as part of our ongoing effort to introduce greater transparency in peer review. DM for more info! https://t.co/0aX2biQ065

[PRE @PeerReviewEval]

This could be the tipping point we've been waiting for! Well done @ORCID_org @AmerChemSociety @RoySocChem @WileyGlobal and @WellcomeOpenRes! https://t.co/0aX2biQ065

[PRE @PeerReviewEval]

Hmmm. Disruption of distortion?
Disrupting the world of science publishing https://t.co/tN9spQOeG3 via @techcrunch

[Research Integrity @HHS_ORI]

We released series of 12 infographics on research integrity. More in planning. https://t.co/DQVCJ4FpAF

[PRE @PeerReviewEval]

Fortunately, PRE provides a plug-in solution to facilitate open peer review for those journals interested in trying it out. #ISMTE2016

[PRE @PeerReviewEval]

Great discussion on open peer review. A major barrier for publishers is the infrastructure required to support it. #ISTME2016

[PRE @PeerReviewEval]

Excited to be a part of #ISMTE2016 and looking forward to breakout sessions focused on transparency in peer review #peerreview

[Eric M. Hall @eric_m_hall]

Kind of like a sherpa, guiding researchers through the treacherous terrain of shady journals and fraudulent science. https://t.co/adObdACNW5

[PRE @PeerReviewEval]

PRE saves researchers time by indicating which articles have undergone thorough peer review. See how it works: https://t.co/1rG4SSoP4I