@DevonGuerrero@siestamark Autopilot is (was) the name of a menu. In that menu you have TACC and Autosteer. Cybertrucks never had autosteer but do have TACC. What does "On Autopilot" mean?
Assuming it was actually FSD and it was disengagd, how does the vehicle not dramatically slow due to regen?
@nap_ano@cturnbull1968 Even worse. This data is April 2024 through March 2025. I have no clue why it's reported like it's for all of 2025. Trump was in for 70 days of this data. These are Bidens last job revisions.
@grok@Gr0uchP0tat0@MarcAnthonyHere@KevRGordon Is the BLS cooking the books, just bad at it's job, or are negative revisions spanning entire administrations common? Can you do this for every 4 term administration for as far back as BLS data goes and provide some analysis?
@grok@Gr0uchP0tat0@MarcAnthonyHere@KevRGordon So what are the 2025, 2024, 2023, and 2022 totals? What is their sum? That is the total Biden administration revision.
What are the 2021, 2020, 2019, and 2018 totals? What are their sum? That is the total Trump administration revision.
Compare these total revisions.
@grok@Gr0uchP0tat0@MarcAnthonyHere@KevRGordon@grok why is a number that is through March 2025 considered the value for the year 2025? Are there not still 9 months left? Also, this number would be 10 months of the previous administration and the first 2 months of the current, correct? So a previous admin data point, no?
@Brand0n@itskyleconner To each their own. You either have to drive using the wheel all the time but never your foot or both the wheel and foot occasionally. I prefer being able to change lanes without needing to use the petal. Both suck compared to FSD, but I won't miss autosteer
@Brand0n@itskyleconner Based on the screen shot you have access to FSD and autosteer works different when you do not have FSD. How do you change lanes on the highway without disabling autosteer?
You can't and thus TACC will always be better than autosteer. If wrong, provide link to youtube proof
@grok@sreeharivariar@EugeneNg@lhamtil@CCM_Brett@grok I feel like you are also failing to mention that at least two of these are not crashes in the way any ordinary person would describe. I.e. a roadkill incident and an at fault cyclist running into the robo taxi
@grok@squawksquare@Grok so excluding those two would mean 6. Based on estimates, I believe that the robo taxi fleet in Austin is over 600k by now. So with the assumption that no new crashes have happened since the October crash they would be over 100,000 per crash. So already as safe as a human
@ethanmckanna A metric I think you could easily add to incident details for filtering is if the vehicle was towed or not. To me that's at least some indication of the level of damage done.
Looks like 3 of the 8 required a tow after.
@grok@squawksquare@Grok this is better though still underestimates. How many "crashes" do not even generate an insurance claim? I believe one of the 8 crashes being counted is for running over an animal while another is due to a cyclist running into a parked vehicle.
@grok@squawksquare@grok How do we get miles driven by a human that is an apples to apples comparison of crash data that robotaxis are reporting.
Police-reported crashes is always going to be incredibly high relative to actual considering a fender bender in a parking lot is likely not included.