Erikson K;

Psicólogo por formação, programador por interesse e estatístico por necessidade.

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

@burkov Whoa, people in replies really want to lecture a fellow skeptic on shallow theology, huh?
My wife is a scientist and a believer. But it comes with price: she keeps her belief in a separate register and interpret god as a inspiring force for ethics, more than a deity.

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

@coproduto import { Cthulhu } from 'r_lyeh';

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

@coproduto "Ufa, pelo menos não é Java 8"

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

O problema de cosmovisões como a psicanálise não é que elas são pseudociências - elas são anticientíficas, no sentido de que a verdade já foi revelada e não há avanço ou refutação, apenas exegese.

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

Não gosto muito de uma loss function binária pela perda de informação para predições contínuas, mas cara, esse pessoal erra demais.

https://t.co/HrYTz9qfoy

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

People saying Wikipedia is wrong because it does not endorse 'objective facts' like IQ racism just shows how hard it is to find common ground for reasoning.

[Jimmy Wales @jimmy_wales]

I think Elon is unhappy that Wikipedia is not for sale. I hope his campaign to defund us results in lots of donations from people who care about the truth. If Elon wanted to help, he'd be encouraging kind and thoughtful intellectual people he agrees with to engage.

https://t.co/RU9YwbvqOI

[Chris McCord @chris_mccord]

Phoenix LiveView 1.0.0 is finally here! Check the announcement for details https://t.co/3E6NSiXxeV

If you haven't given Elixir/Phoenix a try, you can now get started in seconds by installing Elixir and generating a Phoenix project from a single command:

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

Economistas boca alugada querendo "ponderar" a PEC das 36h semanais de trabalho fazem parecer que os impactos podem ser previstos de forma puramente argumentativa. Bring in the data!

[goosewin @Goosewin]

happy friday

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

A imaginação humana realmente não tem limites: sempre achando novas maneiras de reduzir uma realidade complexa a teorias simples.

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

@soychotic Code counselor, well, of course! (I transitioned from psych so trust me on this one.)

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

@gabrielpands @sseraphini Lei do vim: toda produtividade ganha com um editor modal e centrado no teclado é perdida em tempo gasto customizando e modificando as funcionalidades.

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

@ChrisCrandall19 @GregoryFaletto If we want to teach inferential stats without the math, whatever that is, then concepts like sample and population, estimator and estimate becomes paramount! We can address then in a less formal setting, for sure.

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

@ChrisCrandall19 @GregoryFaletto We are talking about different aims: I mean the ability to adequately interpret quantitative results of scientific research, while the paper you quote is about overall heuristics for inferential reasoning. Not mutually exclusive, but for one the math is of much less concern.

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

@shwuydev Versão mais recente: https://t.co/MQwr45nQIQ

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

@shwuydev Se inglês não for uma uma barreira, definitivamente: https://t.co/JUN9wHdn27

Videos e livro texto, cheio de execícios com solução e ainda dá um overview de coisas cruciais para programação em geral e funcional em particular.

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

@ChrisCrandall19 @GregoryFaletto Although I agree, this begs the question: should we bother teaching inferential stats to psych undergrads? This distinction underpins why we care about those magic numbers reported on papers and heuristics here have driven us astray more often than not.

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

@camjpatrick The wording here is important, though. Learning that the probability statement applies to the estimator rather than the estimate is crucial in frequentist statistics. "Before the data are collected" is also poor wording - are you working with a post. dist. or another function?

[Erikson K; @ErikStochastic]

@MatthewBJane Factor Analysis is a beautiful mathematical model but useless for scientific discovery and justification. Please, just stop using it.