@GovTimWalz Youโre a blight on Western civilization and the worst kind of failed leader. An honorable man would resign and go into hiding.
Iโd say you should write your memoirs, but youโre going to need the worldโs best fantasy authors to frame you as the good guy.
@ConandLibparody @Shocklobster99@Pirat_Nation I'm not sure what you think the archetypal "average gamer" is, but it definitely isn't the unstable guy with 19 flags in his profile.
A terribly flawed argument. Your value of two hours is obviously very different from mine. I can't remember the last time I spent two hours "researching" a game, and I'd guess the same goes for most first world adults over 30, who also see $70 as insignificant. What isn't insignificant to me is spending hours on a game I don't care for, but I'm experienced enough to know what I likely will and won't like based on experience. Sometimes, I may rely on a trailer to tell me if I want to buy or continue following a game. If your company sucks at marketing enough to lose the many people like me with your first presentation, that's on them. I couldn't care less. Iโve got plenty of other games to play.
It's really not. The developer and publisher decide what game they want to make and how to market it. I don't have time to read 20+ reviews before buying a game. If you make a good game and market it like a retard, that's on them, not the buyer. Make me want the game, or don't. There are plenty of games to play these days.