Some notes on the said commissioned study on Monterrazas.
Why insist on using the data of the “Mont Property Group” instead of the mandated agencies?
Why modelled as “grassland”, instead of barren land?
compliment v. complement
compliment: ang ganda mo
complement: ang ganda mo, heto bagay na bag dyan para kumpleto outfit mo
pambabastos: ang ganda mo, nakaramdam ako ng init, ang dami ko nang na-imagine
The analogy wasn’t malicious said the person who made the remark. But the impact was clear..it made people, most especially women feel disgusted and disrespected.
If that kind of analogy was used to make a point it clearly reveals the mindset of the person who said it.
That’s not something we should normalize.
Hi Ms @annecurtissmith ! Please consider filing an ethics complaint as well as a criminal complaint for Qualified Sexual Harassment Online and in Public Spaces or Sec. 15 of the Bawal Bastos Law. Teach him a lesson! Do not accept apologies. Laban!
The Archdiocese of Manila released the Prayer for Deliverance from a Typhoon. Let us pray together for the safety of everyone. May it remain in our hearts that with our faith and trust in the Almighty God, He is the one who will save and protect each one of us.
The #SupremeCourtPH (SC) has reiterated that hiding one’s homosexuality from a spouse can be considered fraud and may be used as a ground to annul a marriage.
In a Decision written by Associate Justice Antonio T. Kho, Jr., the SC’s Second Division annulled the marriage of a woman whose husband concealed his homosexuality before they got married.
The couple met on social media. On their first date, the woman noticed that the man seemed distant. The man also avoided sitting beside her. When asked about this, the man said he was just shy and lacked confidence.
The two kept a long-distance relationship as the man worked overseas. Notwithstanding this, they got married two years later.
But the man continued to avoid intimacy and often started arguments to avoid his wife. Just two months after the wedding, he returned overseas and stopped communicating with her.
Later, the woman found magazines with half-naked and naked male models among her husband’s things. When she confronted him, he admitted that he was homosexual. The woman then filed for annulment of their marriage.
The SC ruled that the woman’s consent to the marriage was obtained through fraud, and that the marriage must be annulled on the ground of fraudulent concealment of sexuality, following Article 45(3) in relation to Article 46(4) of the 𝘍𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘊𝘰𝘥𝘦.
Article 45 of the 𝘍𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘊𝘰𝘥𝘦 states that a marriage can be annulled if one party’s consent was obtained through fraud, as long as the couple did not continue living together after discovering the fraud. Article 46 further specifies that hiding one’s homosexuality or lesbianism from a spouse is considered fraud.
The SC gave credence to the woman’s allegations, noting that the man’s admission and his unexplained silence when his sexuality was being questioned could not be ignored. It found that the husband intentionally hid his homosexuality to persuade the woman to stay and marry him.
Read the full text of the Press Release at https://t.co/1IQdRW3pY5.
Read the full text of the Decision at https://t.co/SKXUZyKgA6.
Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://t.co/F48RF1vtzZ.