Le silence autour de Chat Control, de la volonté d’interdire les VPN, du contrôle des réseaux sociaux, de l’Euro numérique ; le fait que les votes au PE se déroulent au milieu de l’été, sont autant de signes que ces sujets sont cruciaux pour notre avenir.
Y’a deux lois de malades qui sont passés en l’espace de 48h, une qui est un permis de tuer pour les fdo et l’autre qui explose le principe de vie privée mais quasiment aucun influenceur en parle…
🇬🇧 No major party is running against Nigel Farage in the Clacton by-election.
🗳️ We urge you to vote against unserious candidates with hollow plans for their constituencies.
🤖 Thus, we stand by and proudly endorse Count Binface!
"European Peoples party"
My fucking ass. These are TRAITORS, nothing else. People voted against chat control several times. People don't want mass surveillance.
Pour ''lutter contre la pédopornographie'' hein
On rappelle que personne en Europe de lié à l'affaire Epstein n'a été inquiétée de quelque façon que ce soit.
We seal envelopes not because the letter contains a conspiracy, but because the contents belong exclusively to the sender and the receiver.
The "nothing to hide" argument is pure corporate/state propaganda. Privacy isn't about hiding a crime; it's about deciding who gets access to your life. It’s a boundary of power, not a shield for guilt.
Chat Control has been passed, even though a majority voted against.
This is because @EPPGroup used an urgent procedure that would require an absolute majority to reject it.
What a disgusting way of politics. Europeans will remember, and vote the EPP out in the next election.
"I have nothing to hide"
Yeah? Except:
Your medical info.
Your search history.
Your financial history.
Your location patterns.
Your relationship "data."
Your habits and routines.
Your banking information.
Privacy isn’t about secrecy.
It’s about refusing to be inventory.
The EU Parliament REJECTED Chat Control, but now they are forcing us to vote it AGAIN to revive it. What kind of democracy is this if we're forced to vote on the same issue over and over until they get the result they want?
My colleague @MarketkaG explained the situation very well in plenary👇🏻
🇪🇺 La abogada Meike Terhorst, sobre la ID (Identificación Digital):
“Los estados miembros pueden negarse a implementar la ID. Para los ciudadanos de la UE, mi consejo es rechazar la ID.
La ID no la emite la UE ni su gobierno, sino un cártel de bancos y grandes tecnológicas. “
Bad take.
The EU should stand for privacy, like it has always done. It's one of the defining values of the modern EU.
Protecting children can happen without blanket mass surveillance, experts have said these measures are ineffective and a breach of privacy.