上一期视频中,涉及一位非公共权力人物的内容,我需要做一个更正和说明。
在讨论 Dario、Anthropic 与中美 AI 议题时,我虽然对视频中出现的相关图片做了打码处理,但仍然使用了一些超出论证必要范围的可识别信息。现在看来,画面上的遮挡并不等于信息处理已经足够谨慎;这种处理方式可能让部分讨论,偏离本应关注的公共议题。
我也注意到,视频里包含了一些关于私人关系与公共人物心理动机之间关联的推测。虽然这些表达并非负面评价,也不是对当事人的事实指控,但现在看来,这类推测超出了公共议题讨论的必要范围,也不够严谨。我会在后续版本中删除相关表达。
我已经暂时下架相关视频,并会在完成必要修改、弱化不必要的个人识别细节之前,不再公开该版本。也请大家不要继续搜索、传播、拼接当事人的个人信息,更不要联系、评论或骚扰当事人及其家人。
这期视频真正应该讨论的是科技公司、AI 治理、平台权力和公共政策,而不是让无关私人个体承受额外关注。
之后我会采用更严格的编辑标准,在涉及非公共权力人物时,只保留真正服务于公共议题论证、且必要的���息。
对这次编辑判断不周,以及没有以应有的谨慎处理相关材料,我表示歉意,也会继续加强新闻伦理方面的学习。
A note regarding the individual mentioned in my last video.
In my video on Dario Amodei, Anthropic, and the US-China AI race, I blurred all images in which this person appeared. I also included identifying details that went beyond what the argument required. In retrospect, blurring images is not the same as handling information carefully, and the way I used that material risked pulling attention away from the public-interest questions the video was meant to address.
I also want to acknowledge that the video contained speculation connecting a private relationship to a public figure's views on China. Those passages were not intended as negative characterizations, and they do not make factual claims against the individual. But I now recognize that this kind of speculation exceeds the bounds of responsible public-interest discussion and lacks the rigor it would require. I will remove those passages before the video is republished.
The video is currently offline. It will stay down until I have completed the necessary edits.
I want to be direct: please stop searching for, sharing, or aggregating personal information about this individual. Do not contact her, her family, or anyone connected to her. Do not send messages, leave comments directed at her, or involve her in this discussion in any way.
The conversation this video was meant to contribute to is about tech companies, AI governance, platform power, and public policy, not about placing a private individual under public scrutiny.
Going forward, I will apply a stricter editorial standard: only information genuinely necessary to the public-interest argument belongs in the final cut.
I apologize for this lapse in editorial judgment and for not handling the material with the care it required.