#typotwt#typologytwt the communities reaction that katherine fauve article shows a bigger underlying issue which is that we either take what authors say religiously, or completely disregard anything that isn’t “reliable” or “real” enough which makes no sense bc typology-
is abstract, there won’t be one objective answer for how real something is. discussion should focus on expanding concepts and ideas and not “this author said it so it’s right because they say so” or “naranjo is harsh so his descriptions are bad dont use them”