Will 🇨🇦

Lover of freedom, proudly a🇨🇦immigrant.

[Globe Politics @globepolitics]

Ottawa’s lawful access bill contains ‘chilling’ proposals, Signal executive tells MPs https://t.co/x16lII10u7

[Will 🇨🇦 @ev0l]

@sarobertson_ Yes, less women in power and more wife beaters 🙄

[Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱 @ryangerritsen]

Just two days after being sworn in, this was Carney's in flight food bill for his trip to the UK.
$52,610 dollars.
Same guy had to audacity to tell Canadians that they will have to make sacrifices.

[Michael Geist @mgeist]

Apple leaves no doubt about the risk of Bill C-22 :
"as drafted, this bill allows the Government of Canada to force companies to break encryption by inserting backdoors into their products, something Apple will never do."

[Pierre Poilievre @PierrePoilievre]

Your tax dollars were used by the CBC to target, harass, and humiliate retired RCMP officers.

This is a new low. The CBC must answer how this was allowed to happen, and apologize to the retired officers they involved.

[Brian Lilley @brianlilley]

14 Liberal MPs write a letter critical of Carney.
CBC gets it and writes this.
"Despite signing their names at the bottom of the letter, the MPs do not want to be publicly identified," CBC writes.
No names released.
This would not happen to Poilievre.
https://t.co/9UFLmzLDch

[Milan Malivuk @mmalivuk]

I'm the CRO of @Sync, Canada's end-to-end encrypted cloud storage provider, and Canada's Bill C-22 stands to cause immeasurable harm to the rights of Canadian citizens, and an industry that Canada should be leading in the technology sector.

This bill will cause an exodus of companies, investment, and talent and will not make Canadians any safer. This is a mass government surveillance bill that aims to make privacy companies and people agents of the state. Canada already has methods to collect data, through legal means and using warrants.

This goes against everything @Sync stands for and we will continue to fight against this bill and we are preparing additional measures should this misguided bill come to pass.

@mgeist @JCCFCanada @MelissaLMRogers @Tablesalt13

[Will 🇨🇦 @ev0l]

@Safety_Canada This is a joke right ?

[Toronto Star @TorontoStar]

Ontario police are using spyware that lets them remotely take over your smartphone. They’re fighting to keep almost everything about it secret https://t.co/tQ1D0WF7M7

[Barbara Kay @BarbaraRKay]

Can we say @cbc “scandal” now? Officially? Like is it “inquiry” time? I say yes.

[The Food Professor @FoodProfessor]

Not food-related post.

This is likely one of the most sickening things I’ve seen the CBC do. Read the story below. ⬇️

One of the RCMP officers pranked by the CBC is a personal friend.

I can’t believe a Crown corporation, funded by the Canadian public, would do something like this to people who served our country for decades, only to humiliate them.

[Cory Morgan @CoryBMorgan]

@IRPlawyer How many bodies have been found at the Kamloops residential school site?

[mert @mert]

canada is trying to make mandatory government spyware and backdoors for literally everything you use

[Lindsay Shepherd @NewWorldHominin]

The CBC "prank show" deception scandal is getting so much worse.

The producers (operating under fake identities/fake company names with fake websites) told a number of RCMP veterans - people who dedicated their lives to serving on the frontlines - that they were invited to film for a show called "Life After Service." A ceremony to thank them for their service would follow, and they were told dignitaries would be present. This would take place at the CBC Vancouver studio. They were told to come in uniform.

When the RCMP vets arrived at the CBC Vancouver studio on March 25th and 26th, the "pranksters" took their phones away, which they claimed was CBC Vancouver studio policy. The former RCMP officers were also placed in front of an audience of what they were told were about two dozen "journalists." And it was sprung on them that this was a "live broadcast", with "media availability" afterwards!

Then the producers switched up the whole session to be not about life after service, but the historical wrongs committed by the RCMP against indigenous peoples - to berate these vets for being part of the RCMP.

There is so much more but I am hoping the individuals targeted in this elaborate scheme will be able to share their stories themselves.

Seriously, what even sounds remotely funny or silly about this concept? It is just sick and cruel

@CBCNews and @APTNNews... what are you thinking?

[Mark E. Jeftovic @jeftovic]

As someone who runs a company that is probably captured under the definition of an ESP in C-22, our position will be that the systemic vulnerability safeguard precludes us from complying.

Any "backdoor" data extraction method introduces systemic vulnerability, thus we would respectfully be unable to implement.

That would be the official easyDNS position and we will go the distance in court to defend it.

[Michael Geist @mgeist]

Why are Signal, Apple, VPNs and the US Congress raising alarm bells about Canada’s lawful access plans? My post on the privacy and cybersecurity risks to Canadians with Bill C-22’s two-headed monster of metadata retention and new surveillance capabilities.
https://t.co/S7rnmB1wAC

[Globe Politics @globepolitics]

Major Canadian online privacy company plans to leave country if lawful access bill passes https://t.co/FPn2obVwSn

[Wayne @CardinalWayne]

This isn't a lawful access bill this is a police state bill. It's not just your online activity that they have full access to your camera's phone and microphone they can listen and watch you in your own home anytime they want.

This is one of the most dangerous bills ever introduced in the House of Commons

[Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms @JCCFCanada]

Canadians need to get ready to oppose the re-introduction of the widely discredited Online Harms Act, as the federal government continues to indicate that it wants to bring back the legislation that did not pass in 2025.

The next version would be even broader in scope, extending government oversight into private AI conversations and encrypted digital communications. As columnist Jay Goldberg warns, the proposed expansion would represent a major escalation in state regulation of online speech and private digital activity. The original Online Harms Act, (Bill C-63), would have seen internet platforms aggressively censor content, monitor users, and remove legitimate speech out of fear of liability. It also proposed giving the Canadian Human Rights Commission the power to prosecute citizens over their speech, and even allow anonymous complaints.
https://t.co/GWpQ9aTapx

Take a stand today against the return of the Online Harms Act: https://t.co/iWbm9DtbfU

[Will 🇨🇦 @ev0l]

@jdtabish @darron @TheHillTimes You are assuming that is not what they want.