I understand having bruises.
What'd be really scary is if the makeup they're using to hide bruises matches his skin when they put it on, but then his skin changes the make up's color to something else.
a look at the back of Trump's right hand as he briefly spoke to reporters in Wisconsin
i'm not sure what's happening here, but aspirin and too much hand-shaking ain't it
(Saul Loeb/Getty)
"Lifetime" warranties are often so watered down & "limited" as to be meaningless.
But WUSTHOF just replaced 12 knives for me, w/brand new just for sending old ones in.
Some were 22+ yrs old. Rivets corroding, handles cracked.
Now they're brand new.
That's a lifetime warranty.
@isaac_schorr Ha ha...this is the response of someone who's never taken enough pride in their work to insist they be allowed to do it the right way.
"I just do what I'm told."
Not everyone reaches that low.
Saw ad for Spencer Pratt, who wants to be Mayor of LA.
He mocks wealth of other candidates over value of their homes. Then, enraged over handling of wildfires, he talks from where his own $4 million Pacific Palisades home sat.
Huh.
Ad was 100% rage, 0% substance.
Sound familiar?
@cigar_mild There are two different things at work.
If you think someone deserves to be fired, fine.
But what either candidate "wants" is meaningless to me.
How do they plan to achieve it?
How does he?
@NoHuddle12 Actually, the neighborhoods I live and spend time in have been filled with unhoused people for years.
Spencer didn't specify what he intends to do about it.
@El_King888 You're wildly projecting. I didn't "pitch" anything. Just found the ad (& statements for Pratt here) to be empty.
Same 100% rage, 0% policy or solution.
I don't care where he lives. Just found it silly to criticize the wealth of others pretending he never lived the same way.
I see so many blathering about how ridiculous E. Jean Carroll's charges against D. Trump were, how there was "no evidence," and how outrageous it is that she was granted any relief.
Do they realize it was two separate juries that ruled in her favor?
(Do they care?)
Made a post about E. Jean Carrol & suddenly lots of men are fuming about how ignorant everyone else is about "evidence."
While Carrol's testimony is evidence.
As her corroborating witnesses' testimony is.
But the guys calling me stupid think evidence has to be videotaped proof.
@EvanHandler 2 separate NY juries and a crooked judge. There literally was “no evidence”. The dimwit couldn’t even remember the date (or the year) that it happened. It’s one of the most cockamamie stories ever fabricated
@mythical_meier You might want to read up on what is and what isn't evidence Tommy.
Because someone testifying about what happened to them is evidence.
As if what they said to others at the time.
You might want evidence to only mean blood on a knife, but that's not what it means.
@ParodyAoc No, you blathering blidiot. I've simply stated that 2 juries found him unanimously liable. So it's legally settled.
And, while you and others are calling me stupid, I'll teach you that 1st person testimony is...evidence.
As is testimony from those you spoke w/at the time.
Hey Everyone...I've discovered something that will blow your minds:
People who use the term TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) are the ones who have it.
Look around.
It's wild.